HSH28 wrote:
Argue against the game then. Don't argue against the man creating it.
Why not?
HSH28 wrote: Point me to the place where it says this game is going to be based on the principles of sexism and far-right rhetoric.
Literally one post above your first in the topic:
Just the fact that he talks about feminism having "won" is bad, like someone's going to lose if feminism becomes accepted. Spoiler: no one loses when there's equality. Well, except the men who lose their unearned male privilege, but that's the whole strawberry floating point.
On the other hand, maybe that isn't what the game is going to be. Will you be able to admit you were wrong if it isn't the game you think its going to be? If its proved this guy isn't the guy you think he is, will you apologise to him?
Again, why do you feel the need to give this guy leeway? He's literally stated online that he thinks feminism is wrong, and progressivism bad. Why on earth would you give someone like this the benefit of the doubt?
As to "what I think he is" what other evidence do I have to go off of? He's stated some abhorrent views, then denied them without apology or any sign of contrition, having only done so immediately after his game got some marketing. Why would I assume he's changed?
Like I said, personally, for me. I will wait to see what this game is. I'd rather not pre-judge it based on anything.
And that's your choice. It's my choice to oppose this game based on the factual evidence before me.