Winckle wrote:It would be nice if we stopped referring to "the left" as a monolithic entity. Anarchists and Socialists could both be said to be left wing, but grouping them together is rather pointless.
Don't be silly, every single person of the left (left means anywhere to the left of Nigel Farage) has the exact same beliefs and opinions.
Winckle wrote:It would be nice if we stopped referring to "the left" as a monolithic entity. Anarchists and Socialists could both be said to be left wing, but grouping them together is rather pointless.
Don't be silly, every single person of the left (left means anywhere to the left of Nigel Farage) has the exact same beliefs and opinions.
Just like those Tory banana splits, eh?
I am not sure I have ever called all Tories banana splits. It is a bit silly to group everyone together as a hivemind just because of the party they support, with the exception of those supporting extreme single issue parties (and even then I am sure they disagree on many issues).
Like that survey kklein posted with 3% of UKIP members intending to vote to stay in the EU.
Winckle wrote:It would be nice if we stopped referring to "the left" as a monolithic entity. Anarchists and Socialists could both be said to be left wing, but grouping them together is rather pointless.
Don't be silly, every single person of the left (left means anywhere to the left of Nigel Farage) has the exact same beliefs and opinions.
Just like those Tory banana splits, eh?
I am not sure I have ever called all Tories banana splits. It is a bit silly to group everyone together as a hivemind just because of the party they support, with the exception of those supporting extreme single issue parties (and even then I am sure they disagree on many issues).
Like that survey kklein posted with 3% of UKIP members intending to vote to stay in the EU.
To stop Cal or Grumpy David jumping on me, I wasn't really thinking of UKIP there (they're single issue but not massively extreme imo), more the likes of the BNP or Britain First.
Cameron would allow Snowden to be extradited back to the U.S., where he faces a show trial - particularly if Trump or Cruz are elected in November. The enemy of his enemy is his friend, but that doesn't mean he's any fonder of Putin than he is the U.S.
I think most if not all European countries would allow him to be extradited to America.
Does America have much of a history of show trials? There's plenty of people in the states who support him. He committed a crime, that much is beyond dispute, it's just whether a lawyer could argue it was in the public interest and there'd be people queuing up around the block to do that and as strawberry floated up as America may be I can't see a judge being told the verdict before the trial began. Certainly not to the extent of the Ukrainian pilot that got found guilty of killing two two journalists in Russia this week (or maybe last week).
Spokesperson says the actress does not use offshore company for tax or monetary purposes
Emma Watson has been named in a database containing details of the Panama Papers leak.
The Harry Potter actress’s name was found by The Spectator in a searchable database containing more details about the Panama Papers tax avoidance scandal.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) published data on more than 200,000 entities on its website on Monday evening. The database contains information on companies, trusts and foundations and users can see networks involving the offshore companies.
Watson’s spokesperson confirmed the 26-year-old had set up an offshore company. However, the spokesperson said she does not receive any tax or monetary advantages whatsoever. Instead, the spokesperson said she uses it for privacy purposes.
“Emma (like many high profile individuals) set up an offshore company for the sole purpose of protecting her anonymity and safety,” her spokesperson said in a statement.
“UK companies are required to publicly publish details of their shareholders and therefore do not give her the necessary anonymity required to protect her personal safety, which has been jeopardised in the past owing to such information being publicly available.
“Offshore companies do not publish these shareholder details. Emma receives absolutely no tax or monetary advantages from this offshore company whatsoever – only privacy.”
Pakistani court disqualifies PM Nawaz Sharif from office - Investigative panel alleges prime minister’s family cannot account for its vast wealth
The case against Sharif emerged in 2015 after the Panama Papers leak linked his children to offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands in relation to the purchase of upmarket property in London.
Pakistani court disqualifies PM Nawaz Sharif from office - Investigative panel alleges prime minister’s family cannot account for its vast wealth
The case against Sharif emerged in 2015 after the Panama Papers leak linked his children to offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands in relation to the purchase of upmarket property in London.
Pakistani court disqualifies PM Nawaz Sharif from office - Investigative panel alleges prime minister’s family cannot account for its vast wealth
The case against Sharif emerged in 2015 after the Panama Papers leak linked his children to offshore companies in the British Virgin Islands in relation to the purchase of upmarket property in London.