Meep wrote:There are a lot of things in life we cannot prove with one hundred percent certainty, actually that holds true with most scientific principles, but that doesn't mean we walk around like morons pretending ignorance of those things. Frankly I find Corbyn's position baffling. He's seen a duck, heard it quack, but is insisting on a biopsy and genetic test before accepting it is one. I can only assume he has adopted his position because of his reluctance to stoke hostilities with other countries.
Of course, being a pacifist is one thing, but not if it means ignoring the obvious malice of others. That just gets you hurt.
I think hes just trying to avoid another Cold War TBH. I see it from both sides, but people are just obsessed with Corbyn being a bad man. WE JUST BOMBED SYRIA! Shouldn't we be talking about the merits of that, not a man who isn't it in power?
Sadiq Khan also gets loosely linked to stories he has neither had enough time to effect or has anything to do with in some cases. If either of them are awful, lets see how the by-elections go. I can guarantee you its not going to be the Labour offices who are going to be worried.
Lets concentrate on the decisions of May, Macron and Trump. They actually have the power to affect the situation right now.