GRcade

Add all of the Womens World Cup wins to the England badge and it wouldn't make any difference.

The Brazilian FA might not have as much readily available cash as those other associations though. Might have just done a bulk order.

Last 16 game against Norway just kicked off

After a real shonky first half this is good stuff from England now, great if we can hold on.

Going to keep posting in here for each match! England are one up in the QF against Canada

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/live/football/32713621

An England side winning in the knockout rounds? Did I fall asleep?

England have just gone 1-0 up against hosts Canada after 10 minutes. Came from a defensive cock-up (never!) but the lass took it well. Actually quite enjoyed what I've seen of this!

FAKE EDIT - 2-0!

It'll all go wrong

It's always you Sykes. Only this time it's someone else too.

It's funny cus it's true.

Every bloody time.

Whoops.

I hate that rubbish about scoring just before half-time being such a hammer blow to the other team. Endlessly regurgitated by pundits without any proof.

PsychicSykes wrote:I hate that rubbish about scoring just before half-time being such a hammer blow to the other team. Endlessly regurgitated by pundits without any proof.

It changes the team talk Sykes!

DML wrote:

PsychicSykes wrote:I hate that rubbish about scoring just before half-time being such a hammer blow to the other team. Endlessly regurgitated by pundits without any proof.

It changes the team talk Sykes!

I can't imagine it'd change it by much. The coach still is in the same position of having to emphasise the teams strengths and remind them of how to cover their weaknesses. Plus, both coaches get to speak.

I just find it annoying how the people in studio nearly always bring it up, yet there never seems to be any fact behind it. I think for a sport with so many games played, you think there'd have been definitive proof for it by this point.

PsychicSykes wrote:

DML wrote:

PsychicSykes wrote:I hate that rubbish about scoring just before half-time being such a hammer blow to the other team. Endlessly regurgitated by pundits without any proof.

It changes the team talk Sykes!

I can't imagine it'd change it by much. The coach still is in the same position of having to emphasise the teams strengths and remind them of how to cover their weaknesses. Plus, both coaches get to speak.

I just find it annoying how the people in studio nearly always bring it up, yet there never seems to be any fact behind it. I think for a sport with so many games played, you think there'd have been definitive proof for it by this point.

I was joking Sykes.

Gimme a break, it's nearly 2am.

Overcoming the hosts would be a huge achievement.