The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Kezzer
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by Kezzer » Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:47 am

My girlfriend has been "let go" not fired, not made redundant - just told to sign a settlement agreement within 10 days for PILON and not to come back into the office until told. In her contract it says that they can terminate your employment and provide PILON - What I am concerned with is how/why?

According to ACAS if she has been dismissed / employment terminated it has to be for:

Conduct
Capability
Redundancy
Legal reason
'some other substantial reason'

she hasn't been informed which it is, other than "your position is no longer needed" which smacks of redundancy

However, if it is redundancy then they have followed zero procedure.

Have a call scheduled with a lawyer today, but strawberry float me is it rough. Very emotional in the household today.... not sure how I can keep things together atm.

This post is exempt from the No Context Thread.

Tomous wrote:Tell him to take his fake reality out of your virtual reality and strawberry float off


Image
Image
Image
User avatar
rinks
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Aboard the train that goes around the world

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by rinks » Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:54 am

"Your position is no longer needed" is pretty much the definition of redundancy! Sorry I can't offer any advice, but good luck.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by Squinty » Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:10 pm

They trying to worm out of redundancy pay?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by Moggy » Thu Mar 21, 2024 12:16 pm

How long has she worked there?

User avatar
Kezzer
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by Kezzer » Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:06 pm

rinks wrote:"Your position is no longer needed" is pretty much the definition of redundancy! Sorry I can't offer any advice, but good luck.


Sure but if she is being dismissed for redundancy then she has legal protection and there has to be a process that the company follows.

Squinty wrote:They trying to worm out of redundancy pay?

So yeah it seems like they have strawberry floated up and hoped that she would sign the settlement agreement and be gone.

Moggy wrote:How long has she worked there?

Over two years

This post is exempt from the No Context Thread.

Tomous wrote:Tell him to take his fake reality out of your virtual reality and strawberry float off


Image
Image
Image
User avatar
rinks
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Aboard the train that goes around the world

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by rinks » Thu Mar 21, 2024 3:09 pm

Kezzer wrote:
rinks wrote:"Your position is no longer needed" is pretty much the definition of redundancy! Sorry I can't offer any advice, but good luck.


Sure but if she is being dismissed for redundancy then she has legal protection and there has to be a process that the company follows.

Yes, absolutely, I was agreeing with you!

User avatar
Green Gecko
Treasurer
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by Green Gecko » Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:01 pm

I effectively paid "pay in lieu of notice" when I fired someone for gross misconduct (in which case they don't have to be paid notice at all, they can just be told to leave) on top of just being gooseberry fool at their job. Except before that I made it very clear what my grievances were and the employee made it clear they weren't interested in doing anything about it, nor thought they had done anything wrong (in this particular set of circumstances it was pretty obvious).

It does sound like they "suddenly realised" they couldn't afford the salary any more or wanted to direct the funds somewhere else, and disappeared her. They didn't anticipate or bother with any due process before it was too late to keep the payroll going, or had to satisfy some other kind of demand, like a top-down executive order.

Any form of doing that, that isn't demonstrably the employees fault (and even in some cases where it is) is gooseberry fool. My mum got screwed out of redundancy after 16 years or so, and I've been disappeared twice before illegally. It's bollocks.

"It should be common sense to just accept the message Nintendo are sending out through their actions."
_________________________________________

❤ btw GRcade costs money and depends on donations - please support one of the UK's oldest video gaming forums → HOW TO DONATE
poshrule_uk
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by poshrule_uk » Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:24 pm

Looks like my pay rise is 3.5% which I know is currently more than inflation which I think was 3.4% last month but am I right in thinking that due to inflation being higher than this for most of the last year that I'm still losing out?

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: The Work Thread 2 - Get back to work!
by Tomous » Mon Mar 25, 2024 1:14 pm

poshrule_uk wrote:Looks like my pay rise is 3.5% which I know is currently more than inflation which I think was 3.4% last month but am I right in thinking that due to inflation being higher than this for most of the last year that I'm still losing out?



No, in theory inflation is a measure of price changes from 12 months ago so you should be aligned.

Of course, inflation is a subjective measure anyway depending on what you include in the calculation.

Image

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dowbocop, floydfreak, Godzilla, Grumpy David and 513 guests