Delta_Orange wrote:The "mutant larvae" was always a weak argument, I just thought it was worth mentioning. From going through Luke's posts before and since I think he is probably innocent - or at least, I don't think there is enough reason to suspect otherwise. Once we get a wolf kill, if it reveals they are "mutant larvae" then that would change things!
Gamma_Luke wrote:I'll probably end up voting Orange just to save myself but I can't even remember why Ted's been accused.
- Ted is in sigma squad, which has the least surviving players, so we figure /might/ give us slightly better odds.
- Ted knows SONMers, and SONMers were killed in the night.
- Ted didn't volunteer to go to the marsh when he could have.
They aren't the best arguments (the last two apply to me! Although I voted hillside which is why I was bitter and didn't volunteer for the marsh). But it's the best we have at the moment imo.
---
Not affecting today's discussion but just a point of reference, I am also slightly suspect of
Delta_Minoru too at the moment.
- Is a SONMer, and we suspect a SONMer was involved at least in selecting targets on the first night.
- Further, is arguing against the SONM logic having any significance.
- Voted for No AC on the first day. Random kills favour the wolves.
- Further, suggested we could kill Edd on the second day as a random choice proven by Tomous' innocence.
- Arguing against the logic of picking from a lower head count squad, and against making any assumptions on wolf/squad distribution.
- Suggested sending Mog, Cribs or Hype to the marshes, despite only Cribs being active at the time (if I remember correctly).
- Defending Ted's choice to no go to the marsh.
- Attempting to cast suspicion on me
- Casting suspicion on Luke for a post that was obviously a joke.
All points individually can make sense as an innocent, it just gives me this collective impression of doubting any attempts at trying to work anything out.