GRcade

Albear wrote:The Christian community needs to do more to condemn this attack

Trelliz wrote:

NickSCFC wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Squinty wrote:I expect there will be nutters praising this attack.

From Facebook (I don't know any of these people).

The use of "there" and "their" in those posts

...but that's the correct usage; "their" would imply ownership of something.

Albear wrote:I realise that, moggy mate . I wasn't being truly genuine.

Some guy just tried to interupt the sky interview outside Scotland yard. A lot of swearing on tv. Tensions are running very high

Saint of Killers wrote:

captain red dog wrote:

Saint of Killers wrote:And there it is. Surprised it took this long.

I've heard that said, but was it really a long time all things considered? The PM had called it a terrorist attack before the 6am news when the overwhelming majority of people would begin to hear about it.

By there it is I meant a "revenge" attack. Wasn't referring to your post. Apologies for the mix up. (If that is what caused it.)

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

still wrote:

Moggy wrote:From Facebook (I don't know any of these people).

Why do people keep saying innocent people , praying at midnight , I don't think so , planning there next attack more like

I'm sorry, what?!

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:I see people on the DM are arguing as to whether this was a terror attack or not. The oxford dictionary defines terrorism as

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So I would say it looks like a terror attack on the face of it. However it could end up being a hate crime, murder and attempted murder.

Also I would argue that anyone who commits murder is mentally ill but that not the government definition.

Poser wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:I see people on the DM are arguing as to whether this was a terror attack or not. The oxford dictionary defines terrorism as

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So I would say it looks like a terror attack on the face of it. However it could end up being a hate crime, murder and attempted murder.

Also I would argue that anyone who commits murder is mentally ill but that not the government definition.

Of course they'll be arguing over whether it's a terror attack. The perpetrators, and people who support their ideals, will be horrified to discover this is being treated as an act of terrorism.

I bet these are exactly the kind of banana splits who would have supported Theresa May's abolition of human rights: let's see how they get on now they are being detained under the 2006 Terrorism Act.

Moggy wrote:

Poser wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:I see people on the DM are arguing as to whether this was a terror attack or not. The oxford dictionary defines terrorism as

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So I would say it looks like a terror attack on the face of it. However it could end up being a hate crime, murder and attempted murder.

Also I would argue that anyone who commits murder is mentally ill but that not the government definition.

Of course they'll be arguing over whether it's a terror attack. The perpetrators, and people who support their ideals, will be horrified to discover this is being treated as an act of terrorism.

I bet these are exactly the kind of banana splits who would have supported Theresa May's abolition of human rights: let's see how they get on now they are being detained under the 2006 Terrorism Act.

Yeah it's strange that we are not seeing the same "deport them and their families!" when it comes to this terrorist attack.

BBC News wrote:The threat from extreme right-wing groups has been growing in recent years - 16% of all terror arrests in the year to March were classed as "domestic extremism".

Those who have turned to violence have tended to go for visible Muslim targets - namely mosques.

In 2013 an extreme right-wing Ukrainian man murdered a Muslim grandfather in Birmingham and tried to bomb three mosques.

The following year saw the jailing for 10 years of a man from the north-west who was researching bomb-making and mosques to target.

And just last December the Home Secretary banned "National Action", a group whose supporters have been investigated for planning violence.

Eighthours wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Poser wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:I see people on the DM are arguing as to whether this was a terror attack or not. The oxford dictionary defines terrorism as

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So I would say it looks like a terror attack on the face of it. However it could end up being a hate crime, murder and attempted murder.

Also I would argue that anyone who commits murder is mentally ill but that not the government definition.

Of course they'll be arguing over whether it's a terror attack. The perpetrators, and people who support their ideals, will be horrified to discover this is being treated as an act of terrorism.

I bet these are exactly the kind of banana splits who would have supported Theresa May's abolition of human rights: let's see how they get on now they are being detained under the 2006 Terrorism Act.

Yeah it's strange that we are not seeing the same "deport them and their families!" when it comes to this terrorist attack.

There's one problem: Who would take those braindead strawberry floaters?

Moggy wrote:

Eighthours wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Poser wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:I see people on the DM are arguing as to whether this was a terror attack or not. The oxford dictionary defines terrorism as

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So I would say it looks like a terror attack on the face of it. However it could end up being a hate crime, murder and attempted murder.

Also I would argue that anyone who commits murder is mentally ill but that not the government definition.

Of course they'll be arguing over whether it's a terror attack. The perpetrators, and people who support their ideals, will be horrified to discover this is being treated as an act of terrorism.

I bet these are exactly the kind of banana splits who would have supported Theresa May's abolition of human rights: let's see how they get on now they are being detained under the 2006 Terrorism Act.

Yeah it's strange that we are not seeing the same "deport them and their families!" when it comes to this terrorist attack.

There's one problem: Who would take those braindead strawberry floaters?

I'm not advocating deporting anyone (unless they are actually foreign nationals). The point is when it's a brown skinned murderer the narrative is "deport them and their families!!" even if they are British born and bred.

The whole thing makes me feel sick and angry. The religious arseholes are banana splits, the nationalists are banana splits. Just all strawberry float off and leave normal people the strawberry float alone.

Jenuall wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Eighthours wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Poser wrote:

Return_of_the_STAR wrote:I see people on the DM are arguing as to whether this was a terror attack or not. The oxford dictionary defines terrorism as

The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So I would say it looks like a terror attack on the face of it. However it could end up being a hate crime, murder and attempted murder.

Also I would argue that anyone who commits murder is mentally ill but that not the government definition.

Of course they'll be arguing over whether it's a terror attack. The perpetrators, and people who support their ideals, will be horrified to discover this is being treated as an act of terrorism.

I bet these are exactly the kind of banana splits who would have supported Theresa May's abolition of human rights: let's see how they get on now they are being detained under the 2006 Terrorism Act.

Yeah it's strange that we are not seeing the same "deport them and their families!" when it comes to this terrorist attack.

There's one problem: Who would take those braindead strawberry floaters?

I'm not advocating deporting anyone (unless they are actually foreign nationals). The point is when it's a brown skinned murderer the narrative is "deport them and their families!!" even if they are British born and bred.

The whole thing makes me feel sick and angry. The religious arseholes are banana splits, the nationalists are banana splits. Just all strawberry float off and leave normal people the strawberry float alone.

But this it the problem - grouping people into "them" and "us", deciding that all people are arseholes because of some arbitrary factor such as race/religion/gender etc. There are no "normal" people - there are 6 billion people on the planet - many of whom are arseholes and many of whom are not and until we get to a point where we can move beyond the level of thinking that says "this person is foreign/muslim/christian/gay/black/white/ etc. therefore they must be an arsehole" then we are going to struggle to move forward.

Moggy wrote:By religious arseholes I mean terrorists that are murdering people on behalf of their imaginary friend.

By nationalist arseholes I mean terrorists that are murdering people on behalf of their imaginary "superiority".

By normal people I mean people that don't kill or commit violence.