Death's Head wrote:How it got to its current position is irrelevant, it is left as a console with limited appeal and regardless of who we blame, it doesn't just deserve success because that isn't how business works.
"Deserving success" is a pointless concept anyway. The Wii U isn't more or less deserving of success than the PS4 or Xbone. A product "deserving" to sell is pointless if it's surrounded by bad management and business decisions. Or, likewise, good business decisions and strategy can shift a product and aren't a sign of it "deserving" that success.
I wouldn't say the Wii U has any more limited an appeal that the Xbox One or PS4. It has areas it covers better than those consoles and vice versa.
And how it got into its current position isn't irrelevant, as simply saying "the console lacks appeal" or "the console had no variety" is a bit simplistic and reductive, and belies a number of other factors. Namely that a lot of this opinion seems to stem from the fact the games you personally enjoy aren't on the system.
A product can have a wide appeal and not sell. The whole idea of marketing is that you make sure knowledge of the product reaches these people. Nintendo didn't do that, so it's current position isn't irrelevant. Especially if your argument about the Wii U's lack of appeal centres on its low sales. I think it can largely be factored down to bad management and poor business choices.