Photek wrote:It's not about attacking Microsoft, I don't care about MS anymore than I care about Sony. You seem to have an opinion that Xbox One is some sort of vacous black hole that is sucking MS' money and profits which is misguided and factually inaccurate.
Comparatively Sony most definitely is a 'small-time' company. Financially it finally has it's head above water but Columbia Pictures is not as profitable as it use to be, so there is an expectation by the public of the need for profitability. Microsoft is the third wealthiest company (by market capitalisation) in the world and with that there is the assumption that they have a bottomless cheque book to spend on whatever they want. However many insider reports on MS have said, understandably, that that isn't the case and different divisions do have spending limits and like smaller companies aim for profitability.
Photek, judging from your previous posts I believe we share the same view - that the Xbox One does not have the same level of unit sales as the 360 had at the four year mark, nor the level of marketshare. Behind the scenes this translates to less income for Microsoft; less unit sales means less Xbox Live subscription revenue and less percentage profits from third party games. So I think it's fair for 'armchair-analysts' to discuss the reasoning for Microsoft's surprising but very exciting decision!