Jaxley wrote:Roonmastor wrote:Jaxley wrote:I am actually offended that some people are voting me low for this category. Literally offended.
Roonmaster, i make all my votes for everyone 100, because despite some people who have problems knowing the difference between 'their' 'they're' and 'there' amongst other things, the standard of English is very good.
Therefore everyone: 100.
Jaxley: 0Good job I don't get to vote, I'd make a search for 'Roonmaster' and make an example of everyone who posted it.
As honourable as that is Jaxley I can't use this for scoring as it achieves nothing. If the scores in a category aren't varied then that category won't be used by players during play. Which makes this whole exercise a little pointless. Please revote.
Goddamnit. And i suppose fair enough. I'll revote.
But why do they have to be varied? If that's what i think, that everyone can actually speak English in a competent way, why not? Besides, they'll get varied by everyone else's votes. And no person who can type properly wants a low Grammar/Literacy score.
As long as their is a variation of at least 20 marks over the majority of the people, it'll get past my 'scanners'. So I'm not forcing anyone to score someone 0 for the sake of it. No one can really complain at getting 70 or higher.
Why varied? Firstly, 100 isn't competent as you said when you explained yourself, 100 is spectacular or world-class. Second, it shows that real consideration has been taking in the voting process as there is no way that 60 forumites have the exact same qualities over a single category.