All times are UTC [ DST ]




Forum locked  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:36 am 
Member
User avatar
rinks wrote:
Would you like to buy my MiniDisc player? It sounds amazing.

Well I heard Sony minidisc players sound better than ipods. Thanks for the offer but I'd prefer this new sony walkman

heres a review
http://www.head-fi.org/t/584479/new-son ... ini-review

the reviewer goes on to say the best thing is the sound quality which he/she says is better than the ipad2 etc LOL this guy even has an external amp??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:39 am 
Member
User avatar
You seem to hear a lot of things.

_________________
Dr Cottle wrote:
My favourite flavour of popsicle is DICK.

Image
St Nick is my bike thieving buddy brother :wub:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 10:05 am 
Member
User avatar

AKA: Maurice Merleau-Ponty
I would look at getting a good set of headphones, or using high bit rate MP3s, rather than using an entirely new player.

_________________
Image

It was awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:00 am 
Member
User avatar
JV wrote:
No. Stop spending money unnecessarily.


Why not? Spending is good. As soon as they stop taxing interest I will save.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:35 am 
Moderator
User avatar

AKA: abcd
Buy more £200 wallets.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 11:53 am 
Member
JV wrote:
I would look at getting a good set of headphones, or using high bit rate MP3s, rather than using an entirely new player.


Precisely this.

If you're spending upwards of £100+ on an MP3 player of any variety, they're all going to be much the same. It doesn't matter what minor differences there are in the hardware, because ultimately they're just going to be taking sound files, interpreting them into soundwaves, and pushing them through transistors into headphones. If there is any difference in sound quality at all, only a very very well trained audiophile is likely to notice.

If you want better sound quality on the move, make sure your tracks are saved at 256kbps at a minimum, and invest a lot of time trying out different headphones. Crucially, DON'T trust any headphone reviews online: go into a shop with your MP3 player and try out as many as you can until you've found a pair that you think are fantastic. Your ears are different to everyone elses, so what one person considers to be top of the range might be uncomfortable on your ears or uncomfortable to your eardrums.


Perhaps more importantly: ask yourself why you feel a constant need to piss your money into the wind. It suggests that you're not happy, that the only thing you get enjoyment from is the acquisition of goods. That's not healthy. You've got an excellent MP3 player, but you want a new one because you're bored of it. Does that not suggest that there's something deeper going on that you need to address?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 13, 2011 12:47 pm 
Member
User avatar
chanticleer wrote:
JV wrote:
I would look at getting a good set of headphones, or using high bit rate MP3s, rather than using an entirely new player.


Precisely this.

If you're spending upwards of £100+ on an MP3 player of any variety, they're all going to be much the same. It doesn't matter what minor differences there are in the hardware, because ultimately they're just going to be taking sound files, interpreting them into soundwaves, and pushing them through transistors into headphones. If there is any difference in sound quality at all, only a very very well trained audiophile is likely to notice.

If you want better sound quality on the move, make sure your tracks are saved at 256kbps at a minimum, and invest a lot of time trying out different headphones. Crucially, DON'T trust any headphone reviews online: go into a shop with your MP3 player and try out as many as you can until you've found a pair that you think are fantastic. Your ears are different to everyone elses, so what one person considers to be top of the range might be uncomfortable on your ears or uncomfortable to your eardrums.


Perhaps more importantly: ask yourself why you feel a constant need to piss your money into the wind. It suggests that you're not happy, that the only thing you get enjoyment from is the acquisition of goods. That's not healthy. You've got an excellent MP3 player, but you want a new one because you're bored of it. Does that not suggest that there's something deeper going on that you need to address?


Thanks. I dunno I just did some research and found out Sony are great for their mp3 players because of their sound signature, maybe I will go try it out instore first because spending my money.

Anyhoo at the moment I use my iphone for my music instead of my ipod classic which I have had for a couple of years now (since launch when they made the aluminium one) so I feel I deserve a new mp3 player instead of using my phone which drains the battery. I hope I don't sound like I am ignoring your advice.

I have encoded my files as 256 or similar and have Bose AE2 headphones and AEGO 2.1 speakers for home use and Sennheisser IE7 (£112) when out and about so I guess I am already getting great sound.

Something deeper going on? It could be that I am still job hunting for a good job whilst working in a supermarket which I am not getting much out off.

thanks


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 8:20 pm 
Member
User avatar
I got one :o
So glad I did now. It sounds better than my iphone 4 and my ipod classic. The touch screen seems even more responsive than the iphone 4 as its easier to select a certain part of a song to listen to.
Its got funky features too like karaoke mode.
Plus the supplied headphones retail at around £40 so i can just sell them on ebay.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:00 pm 
Member

AKA: AKA:
Buyers remorse


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 9:25 pm 
Member
User avatar
Shane MacGowan wrote:
Buyers remorse

no I am not getting any of it with this purchase. It was a good deal on amazon plus I can sell the earphones for about £25 making it even cheaper.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 7:24 am 
Member
User avatar

AKA: Handsome Man Stugene
Sorry, but you are a strawberry floating gullible idiot.

I know you're a strawberry floating troll, but I'm gonna post anyway.
Here's uncle Stugene to break this down for you.

No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
Also I have been thinking about getting a Sony walkman for some time since the sound is evidently better on their MP3 players compared to ipods.

    MP3 players
    Sounding better than one another
    Through what?
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
They even have built in amplifiers and this new one has noise cancelling built it.

Oh wow this is one of the greatest trolls I have ever read.
Built in amplifiers as a sales pitch. Let me ask you something. How did you think these signals were pushed down that wire into your ear? Oh right, they were amplified weren't they? Built in amplifier =/= good sound quality.
Noise cancelling built in. Sorry what?
Noise cancelling requires a microphone. That microphone is gonna be in your pocket. Wow your pockets are going to sound amazing you gullible arse.
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
£250 for the 32GB version

Sweet, merciful jesus you are dumb.

Here I go!

Take that gooseberry fool back.
MP3 codec by design limits dynamic range and is compressed. Music in mp3 format is never going to sound the same as on CD or on the masters.
You're a gullible arse, so I recommend carrying around a lead acid battery to power the following:
a £1200 turntable
a £5000 valve amplifier
a pair (oh wow this is trolling, son) of Adam AX7s
monster cables for all.

Seriously why not listen to the people here who know what they are talking about.

Rip your music from the CD at 320kbps, stereo, 44.1khz ("OH BUT STUGENE! STUGENE! IF I UP THE SAMPLE RATE TO 48KHZ I CAN HEAR MORE!" Nope, CDs are all produced in 44.1Khz.), don't filter below 10hz, normal stereo.
Use a decent set of headphones.
Don't buy into gimmicks.
iPods are decent MP3 players.

Vinyl only sounds better when the equipment used to play it back is good. CDs can sound amazing too, for less money usually. Your strawberry floating Kylie albums wont sound any better regardless.

_________________
Image
Taint


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 10:57 am 
Member
User avatar
Stugene wrote:
Sorry, but you are a strawberry floating gullible idiot.

I know you're a strawberry floating troll, but I'm gonna post anyway.
Here's uncle Stugene to break this down for you.

No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
Also I have been thinking about getting a Sony walkman for some time since the sound is evidently better on their MP3 players compared to ipods.

    MP3 players
    Sounding better than one another
    Through what?
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
They even have built in amplifiers and this new one has noise cancelling built it.

Oh wow this is one of the greatest trolls I have ever read.
Built in amplifiers as a sales pitch. Let me ask you something. How did you think these signals were pushed down that wire into your ear? Oh right, they were amplified weren't they? Built in amplifier =/= good sound quality.
Noise cancelling built in. Sorry what?
Noise cancelling requires a microphone. That microphone is gonna be in your pocket. Wow your pockets are going to sound amazing you gullible arse.
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
£250 for the 32GB version

Sweet, merciful jesus you are dumb.

Here I go!

Take that gooseberry fool back.
MP3 codec by design limits dynamic range and is compressed. Music in mp3 format is never going to sound the same as on CD or on the masters.
You're a gullible arse, so I recommend carrying around a lead acid battery to power the following:
a £1200 turntable
a £5000 valve amplifier
a pair (oh wow this is trolling, son) of Adam AX7s
monster cables for all.

Seriously why not listen to the people here who know what they are talking about.

Rip your music from the CD at 320kbps, stereo, 44.1khz ("OH BUT STUGENE! STUGENE! IF I UP THE SAMPLE RATE TO 48KHZ I CAN HEAR MORE!" Nope, CDs are all produced in 44.1Khz.), don't filter below 10hz, normal stereo.
Use a decent set of headphones.
Don't buy into gimmicks.
iPods are decent MP3 players.

Vinyl only sounds better when the equipment used to play it back is good. CDs can sound amazing too, for less money usually. Your strawberry floating Kylie albums wont sound any better regardless.

Btw I didn't buy the new Z series as its not out in the UK. But £250 for a 32GB android multi media player is a fair price. Its basically Sony's version of the ipod touch.

I got the A series for 99.99 but like I said if I sell the earphones (which retail for £39.99 on amazon EX300) for about £25 on ebay I get it for even less. So that works out to be £59.99 for a good mp3 player with 16GB of storage. Plus I can its small size and the fact that I won't drain the battery of my iphone when on the move.

built in amp - i guess i worded it wrong. This Sony one has a S Master Digital amp which improves MP3 playback etc

noise cancelling - my wrong, they took out noise cancelling in the A series walkman, I thought it was built it like the old X series (but u wud need the compatible earphones)

I will rerip some of my mp3s as not all are in 320kbps. Thanks for the advice

btw I don't have Kylie CDs


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 12:40 pm 
Member
User avatar
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :fp:
Fool Moron and his money. Again.

_________________
Image
Many Lives -> 49 MP wrote:
People like you OnlyShallow are terrible banana splits. I hate you forever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:50 pm 
Member
User avatar
lol m8 :lol:

_________________
Dr Cottle wrote:
My favourite flavour of popsicle is DICK.

Image
St Nick is my bike thieving buddy brother :wub:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 2:58 am 
Member
User avatar
OnlyShallow wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :fp:
Fool Moron and his money. Again.

lets be serious. This was a worthy investment imo. As a music player its so much more than what my ipod is. Its got an equaliser that lets you adjust it on your own, not presets etc. Its just made for music.

http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/1237476652649/5/2


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 9:12 am 
Member
User avatar

AKA: Handsome Man Stugene
You are a terrible troll.

"restore high frequencies lost during audio compression"

_________________
Image
Taint


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:25 am 
Member
User avatar
No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:
OnlyShallow wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :fp:
Fool Moron and his money. Again.

lets be serious. This was a worthy investment imo. As a music player its so much more than what my ipod is. Its got an equaliser that lets you adjust it on your own, not presets etc. Its just made for music.

http://www.sony.co.uk/hub/1237476652649/5/2

It's got an equaliser?! Oh that changes everything.

:fp: It's like the 80's all over again.

Quick question for you. When Michael Jackson was creating his album do you think he listened to the end product and said to himself "Actually, those levels are a bit gooseberry fool, but you know what, people will be able to tweak it into a better sound using the graphic equalisers on their walkmans."?

So when you mess about with the graphic equaliser when listening to MJ, what you are in effect doing is ruining his vision of how it should sound.

Also, MP3s compress the music. When you make an MP3 it strips out whole parts. No amount of electronic guesswork can bring that back. Think of a pixelated photograph, you know what it might look like if it wasn't pixelated but you will never get all the detail.

_________________
Image
Many Lives -> 49 MP wrote:
People like you OnlyShallow are terrible banana splits. I hate you forever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 10:36 am 
Member
User avatar

AKA: á / GDMFSOB
i know a fool and his money are easily parted, but why are you guys giving #1fff so much gooseberry fool? tis the season to be merry, have a beer and lay the strawberry float off

_________________
Cal wrote:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:00 am 
Member
User avatar
Good to see the GRcade's resident white knight is not resting for christmas. :roll:

Maybe because he regularly asks people for advice, he then gets given good advice, he then totally disregards it and does the opposite. It tends to annoy the strawberry float out of people.

As do you, with your constant, unnecessary, white knighting.

_________________
Image
Many Lives -> 49 MP wrote:
People like you OnlyShallow are terrible banana splits. I hate you forever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 23, 2011 11:02 am 
Member
User avatar

AKA: á / GDMFSOB
call it white knighting if you will, but in the wise words of ray smuckles no one should be a cock to a stranger, ever!

_________________
Cal wrote:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked  This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group