38-year-old dies after 'high intensity sex' with his brother

Qikz wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Is there anything 'wrong' with two brothers making sweet consensual love to each other?

I mean, I'm going with definitely yes, but err... yeah, definitely yes .

As far as incest goes this is probably the type with the least risk I guess

It isn't actually illegal (marriage between siblings is however) and the thing about birth defects is mostly nonsense (in one generation at least). So yes, you can bang your sister but why the hell would you, unless you're from Alabama (or Hull).

Ironhide wrote:
Qikz wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Is there anything 'wrong' with two brothers making sweet consensual love to each other?

I mean, I'm going with definitely yes, but err... yeah, definitely yes .

As far as incest goes this is probably the type with the least risk I guess

It isn't actually illegal (marriage between siblings is however) and the thing about birth defects is mostly nonsense (in one generation at least). So yes, you can bang your sister but why the hell would you, unless you're from Alabama (or Hull).

It is not legal for a man to shag his sister.

Moggy wrote:
Ironhide wrote:
Qikz wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Is there anything 'wrong' with two brothers making sweet consensual love to each other?

I mean, I'm going with definitely yes, but err... yeah, definitely yes .

As far as incest goes this is probably the type with the least risk I guess

It isn't actually illegal (marriage between siblings is however) and the thing about birth defects is mostly nonsense (in one generation at least). So yes, you can bang your sister but why the hell would you, unless you're from Alabama (or Hull).

It is not legal for a man to shag his sister.

Even in Bristol?

Ironhide wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Ironhide wrote:
Qikz wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Is there anything 'wrong' with two brothers making sweet consensual love to each other?

I mean, I'm going with definitely yes, but err... yeah, definitely yes .

As far as incest goes this is probably the type with the least risk I guess

It isn't actually illegal (marriage between siblings is however) and the thing about birth defects is mostly nonsense (in one generation at least). So yes, you can bang your sister but why the hell would you, unless you're from Alabama (or Hull).

It is not legal for a man to shag his sister.

Even in Bristol?

It's mandatory in Bristol. But still illegal.

I hope I die before having sex with my sister, not afterwards.

Can be arranged.

Sprouty wrote:I hope I die before having sex with my sister, not afterwards.

She's into that? :dread:

Moggy wrote:
Sprouty wrote:I hope I die before having sex with my sister, not afterwards.

She's into that?

site23 wrote:Oh the huge manatee!

Sad story, outstanding reply.

The fact that the animal was called Hugh would have (imo) made

Oh.

The Hugh manatee.

(In response to the shocking title) a better version of the joke, but what’s done is done

Have to disagree with you there. It's funny because he has a big cock.

Zilnad wrote:Have to disagree with you there. It's funny because he has a big cock.

Karl?

jiggles wrote:The fact that the animal was called Hugh would have (imo) made

Oh.

The Hugh manatee.

(In response to the shocking title) a better version of the joke, but what’s done is done

Yes but you have to consider that the zoo called him Hugh in the first place because of that joke. Posting that joke is repeating the joke the zoo already made.

In the "huge manatee" variant, we see a nod to the context of the story in the referencing the size of the Dugong dong, and thus I'm gonna have to go with Karl here.

That's what I said.

aayl1 wrote:
jiggles wrote:The fact that the animal was called Hugh would have (imo) made

Oh.

The Hugh manatee.

(In response to the shocking title) a better version of the joke, but what’s done is done

Yes but you have to consider that the zoo called him Hugh in the first place because of that joke. Posting that joke is repeating the joke the zoo already made.

In the "huge manatee" variant, we see a nod to the context of the story in the referencing the size of the Dugong dong, and thus I'm gonna have to go with Karl here.

But all manatees are huge. Context to the story is erased by the fact that it could apply to any story about any manatee doing anything. Not to mention the rhythm of how you pronounce humanity is broken up by the hard G in huge, so it’s not as tight a play on words as something like “two manatees”, “blue manatee”, or the most perfect match of “Hugh manatee”.

My vote goes to Karl's big cock variation.

I'm going to put a protective ring around Karl's massive cock.

weird hill to die on but ok

if im going to die on any hill it will be after sex with my big cocked brother

no context me i dare you

38-year-old dies after 'high intensity sex' with his brother

Who is online

Affiliates