Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59

Our best bits.
User avatar
Qikz
#420BlazeIt ♥
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Qikz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:35 pm

Hexx wrote:
Qikz wrote:
Hexx wrote:
Tomous wrote:My favourite moment was watching the confusion over where the humans power from the sacrifice went play out in the thread, being brought back to life and then finding out the infected had got their hands on it :cool:


I also liked the fact they assumed Karl betrayed them almost immediately.


Karl didn't tell us he couldn't/didn't want to play anymore.

The whole idea that Kezzer was lying just somehow made perfect sense in my head. strawberry float you Hexx. :lol:


I more meant you thought Karl shot Hyperion.


I don't think we ever thought that was the case though o_O

I at least just thought that Karl had been infected the night before and shot Hyperion the next day.

The Watching Artist wrote:I feel so inept next to Qikz...
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Moggy » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:36 pm

Qikz wrote:strawberry float me. Oblomov really shouldn't have been allowed to stay alive the whole game without posting. It makes it impossible.


Rocsteady worked it out early on and was still pushing for Oblomov towards the end.

As far as I am concerned hiding under the radar is a perfectly valid tactic in a game.

User avatar
FatDaz
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by FatDaz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:37 pm

I really enjoyed this. It's the first time I've ever been part of the "wolf" team and I loved being on the inside watching the thread implode under accusations :lol:

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Tomous » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:38 pm

Moggy wrote:
Qikz wrote:strawberry float me. Oblomov really shouldn't have been allowed to stay alive the whole game without posting. It makes it impossible.


Rocsteady worked it out early on and was still pushing for Oblomov towards the end.

As far as I am concerned hiding under the radar is a perfectly valid tactic in a game.


Rocsteady was our main concern behind the scenes.

The voice of reason in amongst the chaos in the thread he fortunately never had momentum to take it further.

Image
User avatar
Qikz
#420BlazeIt ♥
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Qikz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:38 pm

Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Qikz wrote:strawberry float me. Oblomov really shouldn't have been allowed to stay alive the whole game without posting. It makes it impossible.


Rocsteady worked it out early on and was still pushing for Oblomov towards the end.

As far as I am concerned hiding under the radar is a perfectly valid tactic in a game.


Rocsteady was our main concern behind the scenes.

The voice of reason in amongst the chaos in the thread he fortunately never had momentum to take it further.


It's because he never explained anything. He just said "I'm telling you it's ob!" with no evidence whatsoever. :lol:

Why didn't he PM Nun to explain it at least. Jeez.

The Watching Artist wrote:I feel so inept next to Qikz...
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Moggy » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:39 pm

I am glad most people seemed to enjoy themselves! I had a blast coming up with all of it. :lol:

I am turning off the laptop now and going to phone only so will not have access to my spreadsheet anymore, any further answers to questions will have to wait until much later/tomorrow. ;) :toot:

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Hexx » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:39 pm

I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Moggy » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:40 pm

Qikz wrote:
Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Qikz wrote:strawberry float me. Oblomov really shouldn't have been allowed to stay alive the whole game without posting. It makes it impossible.


Rocsteady worked it out early on and was still pushing for Oblomov towards the end.

As far as I am concerned hiding under the radar is a perfectly valid tactic in a game.


Rocsteady was our main concern behind the scenes.

The voice of reason in amongst the chaos in the thread he fortunately never had momentum to take it further.


It's because he never explained anything. He just said "I'm telling you it's ob!" with no evidence whatsoever. :lol:

Why didn't he PM Nun to explain it at least. Jeez.


I think just shouting "IT'S OB!!!" sounds a better tactic than breaking out the Phoenix Wright gifs to accuse an innocent hacker. ;)

User avatar
Cheeky Devlin
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Cheeky Devlin » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:40 pm

I'm surprised there wasn't a cull of inactive sat the start to be fair. People were too quickly pushed onto the "I didn't get a role PM" business then the L list.

User avatar
Nun
Member
Joined in 2015

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Nun » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:41 pm

Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.

User avatar
SuperChris
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by SuperChris » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:41 pm

Qikz wrote:strawberry float me. Oblomov really shouldn't have been allowed to stay alive the whole game without posting. It makes it impossible.

Well played though. I'm so sorry Kezzer.

This to be honest it's very hard to build a case and notice things about someone if they hardly ever post.

User avatar
Qikz
#420BlazeIt ♥
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Qikz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:42 pm

Nun wrote:
Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.


Nobody was. There's hiding low, then there's being a role that nobody can scout out at all and being completely inactive making it impossible to even think you're part of the game.

The Watching Artist wrote:I feel so inept next to Qikz...
User avatar
Cheeky Devlin
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Cheeky Devlin » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:43 pm

Nun wrote:
Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.

Just realised that I'd have been immune as well if I'd been leader. Oh what sweet irony that would have been. Deliberately hand them the win and not be able to join them as I'd be "safe". :lol:

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Hexx » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:43 pm

Nun wrote:
Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.



You actually aren't far off.

The L list did have both Alpha and Beta on (and another infected IIRC) if you took it too mean name/role.

Aftsr night 3 you potentially had quite a short list

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by That » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:44 pm

Qikz wrote:Karl didn't tell us he couldn't/didn't want to play anymore.


Woah woah woah, you're chatting shite here mate. ;) I told Nun in a very up-front way about that. He even had a note about it to post if Albear was innocent and I died -- basically "sorry Albear, I wanted to use my power while I have the chance 'cause I'll be too busy to play".

Then when I didn't die, I had an arrangement where Nun would PM me if he wanted me to do something because I couldn't follow the thread myself.

That stuff has nothing to do with what happened with Hexx anyway -- the kill didn't go through 'cause they infected me, not because I messed up / betrayed you. :)

Image
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Tomous » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:45 pm

Cheeky Devlin wrote:
Nun wrote:
Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.

Just realised that I'd have been immune as well if I'd been leader. Oh what sweet irony that would have been. Deliberately hand them the win and not be able to join them as I'd be "safe". :lol:


For the record, I didn't actually realise that-I genuinely wasn't being a manipulative dickhead :slol: :fp:

OB will confirm I kept forgetting we couldn't infect the leader

Image
User avatar
Cheeky Devlin
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Cheeky Devlin » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:46 pm

Yeah yeah. :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Pedz
Twitch Team
Joined in 2009
Contact:

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Pedz » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:46 pm

Sorry for the lack of being involved guys, I'm away and rarely have chance to pop on at the mo. I signed up forgetting about it.

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Hexx » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:47 pm

Tomous wrote:
Cheeky Devlin wrote:
Nun wrote:
Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.

Just realised that I'd have been immune as well if I'd been leader. Oh what sweet irony that would have been. Deliberately hand them the win and not be able to join them as I'd be "safe". :lol:


For the record, I didn't actually realise that-I genuinely wasn't being a manipulative dickhead :slol: :fp:

OB will confirm I kept forgetting we couldn't infect the leader



Yeah we did realise it after we'd made the offer

Then (based on your PM to me) thought you'd realised that and were really really pissed at us. Well Tomos.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Are You Infected? Day 5 - GAME OVER - pages 58 and 59
by Tomous » Thu Jul 27, 2017 6:47 pm

Qikz wrote:
Nun wrote:
Hexx wrote:I feel really bad for Nun

I made the group promise we'd infect him tonight so he could win - but then we didn't get infection (and arguably he'd be immune as leader)

:(

I was doomed from the start today, was never going to get the guy who only posted three tines in thread the entire time.


Nobody was. There's hiding low, then there's being a role that nobody can scout out at all and being completely inactive making it impossible to even think you're part of the game.


That's why you go after inactives early to push people out into the open. You didn't give the alpha a reason not to hide.

Image

Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 164 guests