Green Gecko wrote:Anyway, it's GRcade, you can't criticise Muse, or Nintendo, if you do you must be dead inside.
Not a reference.
♪DEAD INSIDE♪
Had a quick listen to the album and can't say I like that much, that halloween one is one of the worst songs by a band/artist I like that I've heard in a long time.
It isn't my most disappointing album this year, that's jointly awarded to Jack White's Entering Heaven Alive and Ty Segall's Hello, Hi. Anthony Fantano probably likes both.
Green Gecko wrote:Anyway, it's GRcade, you can't criticise Muse, or Nintendo, if you do you must be dead inside.
Not a reference.
♪DEAD INSIDE♪
Had a quick listen to the album and can't say I like that much, that halloween one is one of the worst songs by a band/artist I like that I've heard in a long time.
It isn't my most disappointing album this year, that's jointly awarded to Jack White's Entering Heaven Alive and Ty Segall's Hello, Hi. Anthony Fantano probably likes both.
Looks like he gave Entering Heaven Alive a 5/10, and while Hello, Hi didn't get a formal review, he described it as tedious in his August unreviwed round up.
They just minted 100 NFTs paired to a lossless copy of the album (which you can also buy normally) in which there is a unique code embedded into the metadata of each file (that itself can be copied or shared so basically pointless). "Proof of ownership" (so literally just a copy of the code) is stored on one of the lower energy consumption proof of stake blockchains. The band gets a % each time it is resold (and wastes energy).
It was the same price as any sort of special edition.
The article is clearly writtten by someone just ham-fisting these terms together as it makes little to no sense.
The chart compatible thing is just it's sold on elegible storefronts and is a copy of music and not something else, according to whatever criteria allows something to be chart tracked, something nobody cares about anyway.