"WHO report into COVID pandemic origins zeroes in on animal markets, not labs" wrote:Markets that sold animals — some dead, some alive — in December 2019 have emerged as a probable source of the coronavirus pandemic in a major investigation organized by the World Health Organization (WHO).
That investigation winnowed out alternative hypotheses on when and where the pandemic arose, concluding that
the virus probably didn’t spread widely before December or escape from a laboratory. The investigation report, released today, also takes a deep look at the likely role of markets — including the Huanan market in Wuhan, to which many of the first known COVID-19 infections are linked.
The WHO's director wants to follow-up with a more thorough investigation:
After the report’s publication, the WHO director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who was not directly involved with the investigation, posted a statement saying that he looks forward to future studies of the coronavirus’s animal origins — but that he wasn’t content with the examination of a potential laboratory leak. “I do not believe that this assessment was extensive enough,” he wrote. “This requires further investigation, potentially with additional missions involving specialist experts, which I am ready to deploy.”
Which is fine, it's his right to believe that it's worth a follow-up study.
What isn't fine is implying that the lab's involvement is
likely - or obvious or a leading theory - as it's not. There is simply no reason besides stoking up anti-China sentiment for politicians or media people to be talking about "lab leaks" right now.