Die Hard 5:A Good Day to Die Hard-February 14,2013 - 1>3>2>4

1 > 3 > 2 > 4

\o/

Just realized who should be cast as the third Gruber brother- Christoph Waltz :wub:

But Christopher Waltz isn't British.

Cuttooth wrote:But Christopher Waltz isn't British.

too true.

john hurt it is then.

undoubtably.

Boris

Cuttooth wrote:But Christopher Waltz isn't British.

Neither were Hans or...erm....Booby?

Gary Oldman or bust.

Or Paul McGann! Imagine it, he'd make a great younger Gruber brother.

Drumstick wrote:1 > 3 > 2 > 4

\o/

This is so so true anyone who thinks otherwise is speaking blasphemy!

aren't we at the stage yet in sequels that gruber actually survived the fall and has been plotting his revenge for 23 years and the 3 movies since have all been part of an elaborate plan to destroy Mcclane...

Wiggy G32 wrote:
Drumstick wrote:1 > 3 > 2 > 4

\o/

This is so so true anyone who thinks otherwise is speaking blasphemy!

Wrong.

People only rank 2 ahead of 4 because it's older. I bet half the people saying 2 is better than 4 havent even seen Die Harder for years. A mixture of rose-tinted glasses and hating new stuff just out of principle.

When you watch them all close together (all 4 over 2 days) you can see Die Hard 2 is the actual weak link in the series.

Zenigame wrote:
Wiggy G32 wrote:
Drumstick wrote:1 > 3 > 2 > 4

\o/

This is so so true anyone who thinks otherwise is speaking blasphemy!

Wrong.

People only rank 2 ahead of 4 because it's older. I bet half the people saying 2 is better than 4 havent even seen Die Harder for years. A mixture of rose-tinted glasses and hating new stuff just out of principle.

When you watch them all close together (all 4 over 2 days) you can see Die Hard 2 is the actual weak link in the series.

no 2 is ranked before 4 because it is just plain better....

and I sat and watched 2,3 and 4 back to back

Die Hard 4 is NOT better than the second film.

You people...

Die Hard 5:A Good Day to Die Hard-February 14,2013 - 1>3>2>4

Who is online

Affiliates