French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
PCCD
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by PCCD » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:14 pm

This is going to end in tears and bombs I just know it

The Holly and Delusi wrote:PENALTY: Blatant lies. Five minutes in the Sin Bin.
Something Fishy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Something Fishy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:27 pm

so on this subject, my friend just asked me this question

"Why can't these strawberry floaters burn a Syrian embassy. Is 30000 muslims killed in 18 months not 'offensive' enough."

answers on a postcard please.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Moggy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:31 pm

Something Fishy wrote:so on this subject, my friend just asked me this question

"Why can't these strawberry floaters burn a Syrian embassy. Is 30000 muslims killed in 18 months not 'offensive' enough."

answers ona postcard please.

are we rapidly approaching the "put up or shut up" phase of all this and one strawberry float off big war?


A strawberry float off big war with who? We (UK and USA) have struggled with being in in Afghanistan & Iraq. Add in Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, etc and I think we might bite off more than we can chew. ;)

Something Fishy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Something Fishy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:34 pm

just the whole strawberry floating place blowing up if everyone keeps getting so angry about everything.

course there's always the hope nature will just put us down and start again. we're strawberry float ups of the highest order are humanity.

"we" seems to be everybody with everybody else at the moment.

These printing and baitings aren't only coming from the "us" you mention so that wasn't what i meant. Just everyone seems to be spoiling fora fight,

well, it is 2012.

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by captain red dog » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:45 pm

It's a strange one, on the one hand it is ridiculous to be offended by something like this. On the other hand, I have deleted people from my Facebook for posting cartoons denigrating various football teams. Not that I found it offensive, but more that I found it a bit low that someone would want to purposely annoy/upset someone else like that.

User avatar
Cal
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Cal » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:45 pm

Well I'll just put this here then... :shifty:

A word to rioting Muslims


User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Moggy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:50 pm

I thought we banned Cal from every thread except the climate one?

User avatar
Cal
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Cal » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:53 pm

Moggy wrote:I thought we banned Cal from every thread except the climate one?


Image

Something Fishy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Something Fishy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:56 pm

Thing is, that vid Cal posted is not the first time i've heard that, not nearly, it's probably what i've heard more than anything else because this current stuff is really hardening attitudes. Nobody is helping themselves.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Moggy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 9:58 pm

Cal wrote:
Moggy wrote:I thought we banned Cal from every thread except the climate one?


Image


:lol: :wub: :lol:

NickSCFC

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by NickSCFC » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:10 pm

Cal wrote:Well I'll just put this here then... :shifty:

A word to rioting Muslims



Best in a long time, deserves its own thread.

User avatar
$ilva $hadow
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by $ilva $hadow » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:15 pm

Something Fishy wrote:just the whole strawberry floating place blowing up if everyone keeps getting so angry about everything.

course there's always the hope nature will just put us down and start again. we're strawberry float ups of the highest order are humanity.

"we" seems to be everybody with everybody else at the moment.

These printing and baitings aren't only coming from the "us" you mention so that wasn't what i meant. Just everyone seems to be spoiling fora fight,

well, it is 2012.




What? Speak for yourself.

Nature should put you down for being a strawberry float up. Imagine if you had been Roosevelt or Churchill, you would have been saying that gooseberry fool to your people while they were thinking "we're fighting bigots you fat prick".


Buffy was right, you need a therapist and some counselling.


captain red dog wrote:It's a strange one, on the one hand it is ridiculous to be offended by something like this. On the other hand, I have deleted people from my Facebook for posting cartoons denigrating various football teams. Not that I found it offensive, but more that I found it a bit low that someone would want to purposely annoy/upset someone else like that.



If you have to block people you once considered friends, just because they went out of their way to make a joke about your football team, you're as sad as the losers on this forum who block people because they can't handle the opinions of others. If you're just blocking random folks you had because they're posting annoying gooseberry fool, then its different, but if you stop talking to friends you once liked over jokes, then you're a little baby.

Edit signature
Your signature will appear like this in posts
User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Fatal Exception » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:17 pm

NickSCFC wrote:
Cal wrote:Well I'll just put this here then... :shifty:

A word to rioting Muslims



Best in a long time, deserves its own thread.


With responses of "God I hate that banana split" "Yeah he's right, but he doesn't have to be a banana split" "What a smug, yet correct, banana split"

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
Something Fishy

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Something Fishy » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:38 pm

:lol: I felt a bit that way watching it.

User avatar
$ilva $hadow
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by $ilva $hadow » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:38 pm

Fatal Exception wrote:
NickSCFC wrote:
Cal wrote:Well I'll just put this here then... :shifty:

A word to rioting Muslims



Best in a long time, deserves its own thread.


With responses of "God I hate that banana split" "Yeah he's right, but he doesn't have to be a banana split" "What a smug, yet correct, banana split"




Sounds vaguely familiar to me :lol: Silva such a banana split.


Condells words would have been much funnier in text, in person he sounds intolerable. He sounds like what people think I sound like before mumbling me.

Edit signature
Your signature will appear like this in posts
User avatar
Captain Kinopio
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Memento Mori
Location: The Observatory

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Captain Kinopio » Thu Sep 20, 2012 10:57 pm

Cal wrote:Well I'll just put this here then... :shifty:

A word to rioting Muslims



If it was a word to rioting Muslims it might be slightly more tolerable but it's not is it. It's a pretty disgusting attack on Islam and anyone who follows it.

Time for adventure
User avatar
~Earl Grey~
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by ~Earl Grey~ » Fri Sep 21, 2012 1:50 am

Herbi wrote:
Cal wrote:Well I'll just put this here then... :shifty:

A word to rioting Muslims



If it was a word to rioting Muslims it might be slightly more tolerable but it's not is it. It's a pretty disgusting attack on Islam and anyone who follows it.


Yeah it's a little bit like when Muslims kill innocent Americans in some blanket wave of revenge because of some poxy film. Except he hasn't killed anyone, or even threatened to.

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by captain red dog » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:09 am

$ilva $hadow wrote:
captain red dog wrote:It's a strange one, on the one hand it is ridiculous to be offended by something like this. On the other hand, I have deleted people from my Facebook for posting cartoons denigrating various football teams. Not that I found it offensive, but more that I found it a bit low that someone would want to purposely annoy/upset someone else like that.



If you have to block people you once considered friends, just because they went out of their way to make a joke about your football team, you're as sad as the losers on this forum who block people because they can't handle the opinions of others. If you're just blocking random folks you had because they're posting annoying gooseberry fool, then its different, but if you stop talking to friends you once liked over jokes, then you're a little baby.

Neither. I don't support any team. For example I blocked one guy from my feed because he posted a cartoon pic of a Bristol City fan pissing on a Bristol Rovers shirt. I support neither team, but I found the pic distasteful as it was done purely to annoy and get a reaction. I don't want to associate with people like that because it is typical arsehole behaviour.

In a similar way, this French magazine knows that the picture will offend a lot of Muslims. Discounting the scum that resort to violence, why is it suddenly ok to mock ordinary Muslims (or indeed any religion) just for their beliefs? That isn't freedom of speech, that's just being an arsehole.

If people want to have certain beliefs then that's up to them. I don't see why anybody needs to do something that would be considered incredibly insulting.

User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by Fatal Exception » Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:20 am

captain red dog wrote:
$ilva $hadow wrote:
captain red dog wrote:It's a strange one, on the one hand it is ridiculous to be offended by something like this. On the other hand, I have deleted people from my Facebook for posting cartoons denigrating various football teams. Not that I found it offensive, but more that I found it a bit low that someone would want to purposely annoy/upset someone else like that.



If you have to block people you once considered friends, just because they went out of their way to make a joke about your football team, you're as sad as the losers on this forum who block people because they can't handle the opinions of others. If you're just blocking random folks you had because they're posting annoying gooseberry fool, then its different, but if you stop talking to friends you once liked over jokes, then you're a little baby.

Neither. I don't support any team. For example I blocked one guy from my feed because he posted a cartoon pic of a Bristol City fan pissing on a Bristol Rovers shirt. I support neither team, but I found the pic distasteful as it was done purely to annoy and get a reaction. I don't want to associate with people like that because it is typical arsehole behaviour.

In a similar way, this French magazine knows that the picture will offend a lot of Muslims. Discounting the scum that resort to violence, why is it suddenly ok to mock ordinary Muslims (or indeed any religion) just for their beliefs? That isn't freedom of speech, that's just being an arsehole.

If people want to have certain beliefs then that's up to them. I don't see why anybody needs to do something that would be considered incredibly insulting.


Seriously, you deleted someone for posting an immature cartoon? :lol: Anyway, the point is this sort of behaviour is free speech. We should be allowed to criticise Islam for it's backwards elements, so long as certain followers continue to act like animals. Elements of their religion offends me, but do I burn down their embassies, riot and kill people?

The deliberate offence causing is really just point making. We shall not give in to the bullies. They can continue practising their religion so long as they don't hurt anyone or get all uppity about gooseberry fool that doesn't affect them. Religion of peace indeed.

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
User avatar
$ilva $hadow
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: French Publication doesn't give in to Terrorism
by $ilva $hadow » Fri Sep 21, 2012 10:30 am

Not gunna quote cap red dog to stretch out the page, but like FE says, it's to make a point. That's what the mockery is there for.

You don't see any publications slapping out blasphemy for any other religion except islam, because no other religion will give a gooseberry fool, they may get outraged but you won't get them killing Americans because someone made a joke about christianity or hinduism. No one bothers to make a point of mocking them because we can do it freely anyway without any fear.

I'd probably remove people I didn't want to be associated with due to pissing on shirts and posting it on Facebook, but it's kind of sad that you blocked him because it was a football shirt and caused offence over footy teams. I'd have just removed the moron for pissing on a tshirt and posting a pic of it.

Edit signature
Your signature will appear like this in posts

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BTB, Google [Bot], Neo Cortex, Rawrgna, Ste, Vermilion, wensleydale, Xeno and 588 guests