Page 367 of 388

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:50 pm
by Zellery
Really didn't like that at all. But then I had the main reveal at the end spoiled for me long ago by a poster they were using everywhere to advertise the new season.

The good side right now are looking like some of the biggest strawberry floating morons ever. Let's go all the way beyond the wall, to get an undead to show to Cersei, who won't give a strawberry float anyway and also lets donate a dragon to the undead's cause while we're at it because it's imperative that Cersei sees this dead guy...

And I won't even bother talking about those ravens.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 7:58 pm
by Tragic Magic
Zellery wrote:Really didn't like that at all. But then I had the main reveal at the end spoiled for me long ago by a poster they were using everywhere to advertise the new season.

The good side right now are looking like some of the biggest strawberry floating morons ever. Let's go all the way beyond the wall, to get an undead to show to Cersei, who won't give a strawberry float anyway and also lets donate a dragon to the undead's cause while we're at it because it's imperative that Cersei sees this dead guy...

And I won't even bother talking about those ravens.


I agree with you. I really didn't enjoy it at all. The spectacle was entertaining but the story line really has gone to gooseberry fool now. It's ridiculous.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:00 pm
by Hypes
Image

:lol:

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:01 pm
by Zellery
I like that, though. :lol:

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:26 pm
by Ironhide
mcjihge2 wrote:Theres another fan theory that has been doing the rounds on reddit and i can see that coming true now.
...........Dany is Jons auntie right?


She is, one of Brans visions all but confirmed Jon is a Targaryan.

That sort of detail doesn't matter to Targaryans, the dirty incestuous buggers that they are.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 8:30 pm
by Memento Mori
It's medieval times, I don't think anyone cares once it's beyond immediate family members. IIRC Ned Stark's parents were aunt and nephew.

Fake Edit: Okay they were cousins but still.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:02 pm
by Moggy
Ironhide wrote:
mcjihge2 wrote:Theres another fan theory that has been doing the rounds on reddit and i can see that coming true now.
...........Dany is Jons auntie right?


She is, one of Brans visions all but confirmed Jon is a Targaryan.

That sort of detail doesn't matter to Targaryans, the dirty incestuous buggers that they are.


Gilly confirmed it in the previous episode. Dany's brother got an annulment, secretly married Ned's sister and they had Jon. Robert would have killed Jon (who was then and still is the rightful heir to the throne) and so Ned said Jon was his bastard son.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:17 pm
by more heat than light
Was a bit worried by the first half of the episode, the fight with the giant bear thing was absolutely awful and having the group surrounded by the dead and was a bit obvious. Thankfully things did improve in the second half and I enjoyed the spectacle. It's nowhere near peak Game Of Thrones, but we're not exactly in Walking Dead territory yet.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:17 pm
by Photek
Is it just me of is Dany getting hotter? She looked hot as fook for entire episode.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:22 pm
by Mafro
Photek wrote:Is it just me of is Dany getting hotter? She looked hot as fook for entire episode.

No she's definitely gotten substantially hotter this season. No idea why.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:49 pm
by Zellery
Mafro wrote:
Photek wrote:Is it just me of is Dany getting hotter? She looked hot as fook for entire episode.

No she's definitely gotten substantially hotter this season. No idea why.

Increased makeup department.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 9:50 pm
by Zellery
That water just wouldn't freeze would it?

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:28 pm
by Saint of Killers
Oh strawberry float it's Sindragosa!



:toot:

Why didn't the Fellowship of Dumb take any obsidian weaponry with them?

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:30 pm
by SandyCoin
Aside from a couple of small moments I didn't think much of that at all. Looked nice but I didn't really care about any of it. Zero peril in that whole part with the white walkers too, so was just kind of blankly watching it wondering who or what is going to appear to save Jon. I actually burst out laughing when Benjen appeared.

This whole plot with the group going to find a walker is just terrible.

I'm hoping something good comes of the sisters plot as they are both just being morons at the moment.

Probably my least favourite episode for a long time actually. Was pretty bored. Next episode should hopefully pick up a bit more.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:37 pm
by Saint of Killers
mcjihge2 wrote:Ayra / Sansa both seem to be being stupid, I hope theres a more sensibly resolution to that storyline.


Unfortunately it seems the closer characters get to one another, especially ones which have taken the scenic route before meeting up, either for the first time or as a reunion, the more likely they are to act really, really stupidly. (Daenerys being another prime example of this.)

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:54 pm
by Victor Mildew
As soon as the spear was picked up I said, "theyve already established big dead animals become zombies... we're getting a zombie dragon I bet!".

Where the strawberry float did those chains come from?! :lol: SHE'S THE BREAKER OF CHAINS BUT CHAINS WILL LEAD TO HER BREAKING GET IT. CHAINS.

The uncle turning up was a proper metriod "REMEMBER ME?!". Like why the hell would he even be there or know to ride in to save Jon? :fp:

I really enjoyed it though, nice to see some white scenery for a change along with some walk and talk.

Surely that dragon will breath ice.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:54 pm
by Dual
SandyCoin wrote:Aside from a couple of small moments I didn't think much of that at all. Looked nice but I didn't really care about any of it. Zero peril in that whole part with the white walkers too, so was just kind of blankly watching it wondering who or what is going to appear to save Jon. I actually burst out laughing when Benjen appeared.

This whole plot with the group going to find a walker is just terrible.

I'm hoping something good comes of the sisters plot as they are both just being morons at the moment.

Probably my least favourite episode for a long time actually. Was pretty bored. Next episode should hopefully pick up a bit more.


I agree with this. Don't think they've completely jumped the shark (yet)) but the plot is just absolute bobbins.

It's like they're just making it up as they go along.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:59 pm
by Denster
I presumed they'd taken the chains to Break the gates at Eastwatch.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:06 pm
by Victor Mildew
Just realised they can plain FLY over the wall now.

Re: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Posted: Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:10 pm
by Denster
Ultimately, it's these fist-pumping moments that won out for me. It's absurd to compare Game of Thrones to the artistry of a Sopranos or a Wire by this point, but it's unparalleled in terms of thrill and I will miss it very much when it's gone (in just seven episodes' time).

From the independent. Sums it up pretty well.