Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 1:36 pm

mcjihge2 wrote:My favourite bit was when Sam listed the trees of Westeros.

Image

That was a bumpy ride.


:lol:

User avatar
chalkitdown
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Cork

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by chalkitdown » Mon May 30, 2016 1:57 pm

That was not good. 15 minutes of boring Sam gooseberry fool followed by 15 minutes of boring Arya gooseberry fool (remember when her storyline used to be one of the best parts of the show? I miss The Hound so much!) then a semi-interesting final 20 minutes.

Big fat meh overall.

Albert
Moderator
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Albert » Mon May 30, 2016 2:14 pm

They killed off 2 major characters 2 episodes a go in a fairly low key way. Can't help feel they could have spread that across 2 episodes and fleshed out the deaths a bit. This weeks episode did feel a little filler like.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Denster » Mon May 30, 2016 3:22 pm

:lol:

Honestly, unless someone dies or something spectacular happens then it's dull episode.

Quality scene showing the High Sparrow's sneakiness. Great scene and the return of Benjen to save Bran And Meera. Some more exposition and character development and Arya's story finally moves along.

But, no it was utter gooseberry fool!

:roll:

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 3:32 pm

Denster wrote::lol:

Honestly, unless someone dies or something spectacular happens then it's dull episode.

Quality scene showing the High Sparrow's sneakiness. Great scene and the return of Benjen to save Bran And Meera. Some more exposition and character development and Arya's story finally moves along.

But, no it was utter gooseberry fool!

:roll:


Margaery not walking nude = a strawberry floating outrage strawberry float this show.

User avatar
Cheeky Devlin
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Cheeky Devlin » Mon May 30, 2016 3:34 pm

Image
Image


Totally called Benjen showing up.

Nice ending as well, but Danaerys storyline has cock teased us like this so many times that it's hard to get too interested. I guarantee that AT BEST she'll secure some boats by the end of the season but will still be strawberry floating about in Mereen otherwise.

User avatar
Ironhide
Fiend
Joined in 2008
Location: Autobot City

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Ironhide » Mon May 30, 2016 4:14 pm

Not a fantastic episode but still enjoyable.

I had a feeling that Tommen's good nature/lack of experience would work against him and allow the High Sparrow to 'turn' him

Benjen turning up was hardly a surprise either, shame he didn't show up earlier mind. I'm guessing he'll be Coldhands in the books now.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 4:25 pm

I'm glad Ironhide mentioned something from the books. I was worried we would get through Monday without the traditional Ad7 book rant.

User avatar
Ironhide
Fiend
Joined in 2008
Location: Autobot City

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Ironhide » Mon May 30, 2016 4:36 pm

Now the show has overtaken the books the NO BOOK DISCUSSION rule is fairly pointless.

Annoying Ad is a nice added bonus though.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 5:00 pm

Ironhide wrote:Now the show has overtaken the books the NO BOOK DISCUSSION rule is fairly pointless.

Annoying Ad is a nice added bonus though.


Book split! Split split split!

User avatar
Cuban Pete
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Cuban Pete » Mon May 30, 2016 5:16 pm

Denster wrote:
Cuban Pete wrote:Having seen the name of episode 9 I think it won't disappoint!


Walder and Ramsay die and Sansa, Daenerys and Margaery nude?



:lol:! Here's hoping!

User avatar
chalkitdown
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Cork

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by chalkitdown » Mon May 30, 2016 5:22 pm

I love how upset Denster gets when someone doesn't like an episode. :lol:

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Memento Mori » Mon May 30, 2016 5:32 pm

Boring, boring episode.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 5:36 pm

Memento Mori wrote:Boring, boring episode.


Denster wrote:
I hope you die you cockwomble :x

User avatar
Fatal Exception
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Racist chinese lover
Location: ಠ_ಠ

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Fatal Exception » Mon May 30, 2016 5:44 pm

I liked it. Even the Sam gooseberry fool. I was totally hoping for a bloodbath at the walk of atonement though :-(

I didn't like the forced "We'll need 1K ships" dialogue. Oh do you need 1000 ships? Because I can't imagine where you will get your 1000 ships. I wonder if someone is building 1000 ships.

The above post, unless specifically stated to the contrary, should not be taken seriously. If the above post has offended you in any way, please fill in this form and return it to your nearest moderator.
Image
User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Denster » Mon May 30, 2016 6:29 pm

chalkitdown wrote:I love how upset Denster gets when someone doesn't like an episode. :lol:


i love how an episode is gooseberry fool if there's no tits or explosions for you.



UGH - it's just people talking and interacting. I hate it when they advance the story and set up future events.

I just want sword fights and minge!

:P

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 6:37 pm

Denster wrote:I just want sword fights and minge


Don't we all brother, don't we all.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Denster » Mon May 30, 2016 6:45 pm

I admit. I'm wounded that Margaery didn't give us a wink at her pink.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by Moggy » Mon May 30, 2016 6:46 pm

:lol:

User avatar
SEP
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Game of Thrones (TV) - US Pace - NO BOOK DISCUSSION (that means NO BOOK DISCUSSION)
by SEP » Mon May 30, 2016 7:15 pm

Denster wrote:I admit. I'm wounded that Margaery didn't give us a wink at her pink.


I pretty much cried when High Sparrow said there would be no walk of atonement.

Image

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: andretmzt, wensleydale and 682 guests