Page 1 of 2

GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:05 am
by melatonin
Image


Reviews:

The Elder Scolls: Skyrim - 9/10
Battlefield 3 - 7/10
Halo Anniversary - 8/10
Uncharted 3 - 9/10
Assassin's Creed: Revelations - 8/10
Batman: Arkham City - 9/10
Dance Central 2 - 8/10
Shinobi (3DS) - 4/10
Kinect Sports Season Two - 5/10
Call of Duty MW3 - 8/10
Saints Row: The Third - 7/10
Rayman Origins - 7/10
Ultimate MvC3 - 7/10
Kirby Mass Attack - 8/10
Sonic Generations - 7/10
Real Steel - 6/10
The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of the Unicorn - 6/10
Raving Rabbids Alive and Kicking - 6/10
The King of Fighters XIII - 8/10
Disney Universe - 3/10

Previews:

Dragon's Dogma
The Darkness II
Aliens: Colonial Marines
Max Payne 3
Prototype 2
Risen 2: Dark Waters
Hitman: Absolution
Showcase

Features:

2012 preview special
Interview with Naughty Dog
Behind the Scenes - SSX
Remakes. Reboots and Rebirths

Retro:

Behind the Scenes - Legacy of Kain Soul Reaver
Complete History - 1985
Metroidvania Feature

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:12 am
by Harry Bizzle
What did they fault Skyrim on?

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:17 am
by melatonin
Harry Bizzle wrote:What did they fault Skyrim on?


They didn't.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:18 am
by Harry Bizzle
There must be some reason it didn't get a ten, surely, other than they didn't feel like it?

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:21 am
by Minto
Battlefield a 7?

Single player is wank like but the online :wub:

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:23 am
by melatonin
Harry Bizzle wrote:There must be some reason it didn't get a ten, surely, other than they didn't feel like it?


Well, there are no negative words on display.

Ultimately, what Bethesda has created is a picture-perfect playground designed to engender pure love in those willing to lose themselves within it. Steady improvement, exploration of both place and possibility, and entrenchment in a fantasy world deeply fleshed out by hundreds of readable books, nefarious characters, epic battles, and an incalculable number of quests. If these are your reasons for picking up a videogame, these things have never been executed with greater virtuosity.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:24 am
by Beans
MW3 > BF3 8-)

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:28 am
by Harry Bizzle
melatonin wrote:
Harry Bizzle wrote:There must be some reason it didn't get a ten, surely, other than they didn't feel like it?


Well, there are no negative words on display.

Ultimately, what Bethesda has created is a picture-perfect playground designed to engender pure love in those willing to lose themselves within it. Steady improvement, exploration of both place and possibility, and entrenchment in a fantasy world deeply fleshed out by hundreds of readable books, nefarious characters, epic battles, and an incalculable number of quests. If these are your reasons for picking up a videogame, these things have never been executed with greater virtuosity.


I find this odd.


Generally, if a game is about as fun as I can imagine it being, I think of it as a ten.

I don't tend to think "Absolutely brilliant game. Can't really fault it. Knock a mark off."

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:40 am
by Mafro
Minto wrote:Battlefield a 7?

Single player is wank like but the online :wub:

They'll most likely be reviewing the multiplayer separately.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:42 am
by Eighthours
Quite simply, Skyrim isn't as good a racing game as Burnout 3. That's the reason.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:56 am
by Beans
Eighthours wrote:Quite simply, Skyrim isn't as good a game as Burnout 3. That's the reason.

Fixed :shifty:

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:03 pm
by melatonin
Mafro wrote:
Minto wrote:Battlefield a 7?

Single player is wank like but the online :wub:

They'll most likely be reviewing the multiplayer separately.


No, the majority of the review is for the online mode.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:05 pm
by Frank
Harry Bizzle wrote:Generally, if a game is about as fun as I can imagine it being, I think of it as a ten.

I don't tend to think "Absolutely brilliant game. Can't really fault it. Knock a mark off."


It's not as bad as The Official Xbox Magazine, who don't seem to understand what they're doing: 10 Ways to make Skyrim an 11/10

That's not how reviews work :x

GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:10 pm
by Steve
Review scores have always been daft.

GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:10 pm
by Cumberdanes
The reason Skyrim or any Bethesda RPG for that matter misses out on a perfect score is all the bugs. Yes the game is amazing to play, very addictive, beautiful to look at and any number of other compliments can and surely have been sent it's way but when you can't progress the main plot of a game due to the character you are meant to be talking to having no relevant dialogue options a game cannot be branded perfect.

GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:14 pm
by PES Fan
9 is a great score. For me, very few games should score 10.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:14 pm
by Mafro
melatonin wrote:
Mafro wrote:
Minto wrote:Battlefield a 7?

Single player is wank like but the online :wub:

They'll most likely be reviewing the multiplayer separately.


No, the majority of the review is for the online mode.

If it is, then that's one suspect review.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:16 pm
by Rik
So that's both Edge and GamesTM who say that Battlefield isn't what it was cracked up to be.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:28 pm
by 7256930752
Rik wrote:So that's both Edge and GamesTM who say that Battlefield isn't what it was cracked up to be.

It's a difficult game to review as the experience when playing solo is so hit and miss. I think it should be pointed out that it's much better when playing friends but this shouldn't be reflected in the review score.

Re: GamesTM 116

Posted: Mon Nov 21, 2011 12:32 pm
by Mafro
Did they mention which version of BF3 they reviewed?