GRcade

Also, what if we gave the Daily Mail enough hits from a link here, that they backtraced us with the aid of the cyber police and like, framed us for our...selection of specialist threads...

I'll be ok while you guys rot in prison as I've been against all the dodgy topics.
Being a square finally pays off .

I think I have already stolen enough pictures from there to warrant that

Cuban Pete wrote:You're absolute mongs for not wanting to click the link....of an article you're specifically asking to read. Nobody is making you read any other articles. You big strawberry floating babies.

o/

Ho-Ho-Hououin Kyouma wrote:

Beans wrote:If you lot want to read it just bloody click the link. Its bit pathetic really

I would much rather keep my intelligence than let it slowly flush away like a filled toilet by viewing their website/newspaper.

It won't all of a sudden lower your IQ. Any sensible person will know its complete nonsense

Beans wrote:

Ho-Ho-Hououin Kyouma wrote:

Beans wrote:If you lot want to read it just bloody click the link. Its bit pathetic really

I would much rather keep my intelligence than let it slowly flush away like a filled toilet by viewing their website/newspaper.

It won't all of a sudden lower your IQ. Any sensible person will know its complete nonsense

You need intelligence to work out a web page will lower your IQ

Rubix wrote:

Beans wrote:

Ho-Ho-Hououin Kyouma wrote:

Beans wrote:If you lot want to read it just bloody click the link. Its bit pathetic really

I would much rather keep my intelligence than let it slowly flush away like a filled toilet by viewing their website/newspaper.

It won't all of a sudden lower your IQ. Any sensible person will know its complete nonsense

You need intelligence to work out a web page will lower your IQ

I meant any sensible person will know articles on the Daily Mail are complete nonsense.

G-Ratasaurus Rex wrote:Also, what if we gave the Daily Mail enough hits from a link here, that they backtraced us with the aid of the cyber police and like, framed us for our...selection of specialist threads...

Yeah. The USTV thread would have to be deleted quick-sharp.

I think some people here are just scared of reading the Daily Mail incase they see something that contradicts their goody-goody namby-pamby hoity-toity wishy-washy know it all left wing views.

NickSCFC wrote:I think some people here are just scared of reading the Daily Mail incase they see something that contradicts their goody-goody namby-pamby hoity-toity wishy-washy know it all left wing views.

Honestly Nick, it's not that complicated, even for a relative simpleton like you. People who see the Daily Mail for the hateful, small-minded piece of trash that it actually is don't want to give them the extra web click. Can you wrap your little brain around that? Try your best.

Alternatively, you can find another fascinating article on there to make another utterly gooseberry fool thread out of. I'm sure you'll manage that easily enough.

I don't think it's fair to post intimate details of a member's personal life on here. When Hugo finds out, he's going to be furious.

lewismistletoenin wrote:

NickSCFC wrote:I think some people here are just scared of reading the Daily Mail incase they see something that contradicts their goody-goody namby-pamby hoity-toity wishy-washy know it all left wing views.

Honestly Nick, it's not that complicated, even for a relative simpleton like you. People who see the Daily Mail for the hateful, small-minded piece of trash that it actually is don't want to give them the extra web click. Can you wrap your little brain around that? Try your best.

Alternatively, you can find another fascinating article on there to make another utterly gooseberry fool thread out of. I'm sure you'll manage that easily enough.

Did it ever occur to you that my post was made in jest? Doesn't take much to make you cry does it.

StayDead defence.

Cuban Pete wrote:Oh no not an extra click

And you're better than this, so no idea why you're pretending like you're not.

Isn't reading their article costing the DM money since you all are smart enough to be using adblock, avoiding the adverts, whilst still using their bandwidth? All of these newspaper sites lose money, you increase their costs by bringing more traffic to their site.

Couldn't be strawberry floated reading the whole letter myself, 1,600 words of babble.

Anyone (that did read the email) else read it in the voice of a robot?


Makes it pretty funny.


"My readings show that we had a 96% match and enjoyment levels of 98%. I will now list our top 3 things in common. 1. We are of the same age. 2. We are both of sufficient intelligence. 3. We like the classical music.

How you haven't replied to me does not compute"

You said that you’re planning to go the NY Philharmonic more often in the future. As I said, I go to the NY Philharmonic often. You’re very busy. It would be very convenient for you to date me because we have the same interests. We already go to classical music performances by ourselves. If we go to classical music performances together, it wouldn’t take any significant additional time on your part.

That is probably the best bit of all of it.

Not reading all that.

Harry Bizzle wrote:

You said that you’re planning to go the NY Philharmonic more often in the future. As I said, I go to the NY Philharmonic often. You’re very busy. It would be very convenient for you to date me because we have the same interests. We already go to classical music performances by ourselves. If we go to classical music performances together, it wouldn’t take any significant additional time on your part.

That is probably the best bit of all of it.

It's almost Sheldon Cooper-esque.