Last film you watched and your rating

The guide to 2nd date sex 2/10

A 90 minute comedy where I laughed once.

Land of the Dead - 6/10

Romero zombie film. His second zombie trilogy is terrible compared to the first. This one is the best of the new batch but it's still poor. Little heart, poorly written, very much of its time and some terrible cgi. It needed to be a lot longer, have no cgi, less military characters and some good kills.

Apocalypse Now - 5/10
I'm sure that score is sacrilege to some people, but the film did very little for me. It didn't need to be anywhere close to 3 hours long, and so many sections of boring dialogue or other pointless scenes could have been cut. Martin Sheen was...okay, I guess, but seemed somewhat out of place in the role. There were a few good moments, but for the most part it was dull.

To Live and Die in LA 8/10

Groundhog Day 9/10: Great, loved it, kept getting better throughout the film.

The Princess Bride 8/10: Also great, though I think the first half is better than the second.

12 Monkeys 6/10: Was excited for this, was fine but could have been better

Groundhog Day 9/10: Great, loved it, kept getting better throughout the film.

Ecno wrote:The Princess Bride 8/10: Also great, though I think the first half is better than the second.

12 Monkeys 6/10: Was excited for this, was fine but could have been better

Two of my favourite films! I think I'd agree on The Princess Bride (although it's great throughout) through to Westley's capture is the best of it.

12 Monkeys gets better for me on every rewatch, it's so well written for time travel consistency.

Midnight Run - 7/10

A pretty good comedy action film. Let down horribly by the awful score, the music was so off-putting all the way through.

Groundhog Day 9/10: Great, loved it, kept getting better throughout the film.

Groundhog Day 9/10: Great, loved it, kept getting better throughout the film.

Lotus wrote:Apocalypse Now - 5/10
I'm sure that score is sacrilege to some people, but the film did very little for me. It didn't need to be anywhere close to 3 hours long, and so many sections of boring dialogue or other pointless scenes could have been cut. Martin Sheen was...okay, I guess, but seemed somewhat out of place in the role. There were a few good moments, but for the most part it was dull.

It's been years since I watched this film but I remember feeling roughly the same about it. I'd like to watch it again though as I think I'd appreciate more on a second viewing and I can't remember a large portion of it now.

Zilnad wrote:
Lotus wrote:Apocalypse Now - 5/10
I'm sure that score is sacrilege to some people, but the film did very little for me. It didn't need to be anywhere close to 3 hours long, and so many sections of boring dialogue or other pointless scenes could have been cut. Martin Sheen was...okay, I guess, but seemed somewhat out of place in the role. There were a few good moments, but for the most part it was dull.

It's been years since I watched this film but I remember feeling roughly the same about it. I'd like to watch it again though as I think I'd appreciate more on a second viewing and I can't remember a large portion of it now.

It has some pretty impressive moments, but towards the end it seemed to ramble on a bit for no good reason.

Cats 2/10

strawberry float me, I laughed so much. Not often I'm left in tears of laughter at the credits.

DML wrote:Cats 2/10

strawberry float me, I laughed so much. Not often I'm left in tears of laughter at the credits.

Victor Mildew wrote:
DML wrote:Cats 2/10

strawberry float me, I laughed so much. Not often I'm left in tears of laughter at the credits.

If the characters looked like that, we might not have the same problem! :lol:

Every single aspect of it was abysmal, but at least it was really entertainingly abysmal.

Is it weird that there's a part of me desperate to watch it just so i can see how bad it is?

DML wrote:
Victor Mildew wrote:
DML wrote:Cats 2/10

strawberry float me, I laughed so much. Not often I'm left in tears of laughter at the credits.

If the characters looked like that, we might not have the same problem!

Every single aspect of it was abysmal, but at least it was really entertainingly abysmal.

The Room scale entertainingly abysmal? :slol:

Everyone should see Cats. One day, I hope to see it in the cinema so the wretchedness can be viewed as intended.

It's just so incredibly goodbad it needs to be seen to be believed

Vermilion wrote:Is it weird that there's a part of me desperate to watch it just so i can see how bad it is?

Its so bad its good.

I really have no idea who the film is aimed at, even fans of the musical dont get a good version of the musical.

Last film you watched and your rating

Who is online

Affiliates