Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 10:56 pm
It's an actual crime. She should be locked up for life for what she's done.
Page 5 of 6
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:36 pm
Kill it with fire.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:37 pm
How do you strawberry float up your looks so badly?
Such a waste.
Such a waste.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 11:39 pm
Amanda Seyfried. 
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:08 am
Mother of god...
Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 12:50 am
Alvin wou...
Actually, even he wouldn't.
Actually, even he wouldn't.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:32 am
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:41 am
Jonathan86 wrote:Love the cameltoe.
She could still do with putting on some weight. She has no hips whatsoever, and apparently no stomach muscles either - its just freakisly flat
Skinny fat. Its what happens when women are too scared to pick up anything heavier than the pink weights.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 4:34 am
That's not real is it?
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 5:48 am
Then when she's found hanging herself in a bathtub while over medicated on prescription drugs her Dr deliberately gave her, in a car that was speeding... and some other random celebrity ways of dying, the press will be like "AWH, SHE WAS SO YOUNG", glorifying her as if we really gave a gooseberry fool about her anymore. Meanwhile whoever published her music and movies will raise the price to her gooseberry fool media X10 and claim it was a clerical error.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 8:53 am
What if she supports the ideals of free media? 
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:02 am
She looks like something that would eat its young.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:08 am
Pfft, internet standards 
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2012 11:21 am
Foxhound wrote:Pfft, internet standards
True. True. I mean, if you were a native of Newcastle and you were out on the pull, she's seem like a real catch!
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 1:42 pm
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:09 pm
What are the odds of her being six feet under by the end of this year?
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 2:12 pm
BizzyBarra wrote:What are the odds of her being six feet under by the end of this year?
With the amount of narcotics she has in her system I'm pretty sure burying her would constitute soil pollution and thus be illegal.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:42 pm
Blaine wrote:BizzyBarra wrote:What are the odds of her being six feet under by the end of this year?
With the amount of narcotics she has in her system I'm pretty sure burying her would constitute soil pollution and thus be illegal.
Well you can't cremate her then. The poor mortician would die from the fumes.
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 4:51 pm
And then, as if from a dream, L-Lohan herself appears naked and demands that you ravage her... except this isn't 2006 anymore, this is 2012, so what do you do?
Re: Lindsay Lohan
Posted: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:00 pm
Well...it has been a while. That and I can always flog the story to The Sun on Sunday and call her a massive crackhead. Or shock them and claim she is sober.