Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B. Officially confirmed. Bobby Kotick leaving MS on 29th Dec.

Anything to do with games at all.
User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Monkey Man » Thu Sep 01, 2022 1:00 pm

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) in the UK says that the ABK acquisition must unsurprisingly go to Phase 2 because:

"This Merger may be expected to result in a substantial lessening of competition within a market or markets in the United Kingdom. This Merger will be referred for an in-depth investigation unless the parties offer acceptable undertakings to address these competition concerns".

Summary:

- Markets where a substantial lessening of competition could happen are gaming consoles, multi-game subscription services and cloud gaming services.

- Microsoft has until September 8th to provide guarantees. If they can't this review goes to Phase 2.

- The console gaming market has strong network effects and that makes difficult to enter it. In the last 20 years only MS, Nintendo and Sony
have been significant suppliers of console gaming.

- The CMA believes the gaming industry is in a transitional phase due to the development of cloud gaming services and the emergence of multi-game subscription services.

- The CMA believes that the shift to cloud gaming services and multi-game subscription services is opening a window of opportunity for new entrants and these new entrants will need: 1) a strong gaming catalogue to attract users; 2) access to cloud infrastructure and an operating system (OS) license.

- Beyond gaming, Microsoft has other business areas that are relevant. 1) Azure and 2) Windows. Because of its popularity, game developers generally make games that are designed and optimised for Windows OS.

- The CMA gathered data and reviewed over one thousand internal documents from Microsoft and ABK to understand their businesses, their future strategies, and the gaming industry as a whole. The CMA also gathered evidence from other market participants, such as game developers and competitors across console, cloud, PC, and mobile gaming.

- In the time available, the CMA focused on: 1) if Microsoft could withhold or degrade ABK's content from other consoles or multi-game subscription services; 2) if Microsoft could leverage its broader ecosystem together with ABK's game catalogue to strengthen network effects, raise barriers to entry and ultimately foreclose rivals in cloud gaming services.

- The CMA is concerned that having full control over this powerful catalogue, especially in light of Microsoft's already strong position in gaming consoles, operating systems, and cloud infrastructure, could result in Microsoft harming consumers by impairing Sony's ability to compete as well as that of other existing rivals and potential new entrants.

- The evidence gathered points out to ABK's content, especially Call of Duty, as being important and capable of making a material difference to the success of rivals' gaming platforms. ABK invests significant time and capital in creating regular Call of Duty releases, which consistently rank as some of the most popular games. These titles require thousands of game developers and several years to complete, and there are very few other games of similar calibre or popularity.

- The CMA believes the Merger could allow Microsoft to make ABK content, including Call of Duty, exclusive to Xbox or Game Pass, or otherwise degrade its rivals' access to ABK content, such as by delaying releases or imposing licensing price increases.

- The CMA found that the potential strategic benefits to Microsoft of using ABK's content to foreclose rivals— such as expanding the Game Pass user base and strengthening network effects in its gaming ecosystem—could outweigh any immediate losses in terms of licensing revenues.

- The CMA notes that Microsoft has followed this approach in several past acquisitions of gaming studios, where it made future game releases from those studios exclusive in consoles to Xbox (such as the upcoming Starfield).

- The CMA believes that in the short- to medium-term, the main rival that could be affected by this conduct would be Sony. Evidence suggests that Microsoft and Sony compete closely with each other in terms of content, target audience, and console technology. Nintendo, on the other hand, competes less closely with either of Sony or Microsoft.

- The CMA considers that Call of Duty is sufficiently important that losing access to it (or losing access on competitive terms) could significantly impact Sony's revenues and user base. This impact is likely to be felt especially at the launch of the next generation of consoles, where gamers make fresh decisions about which console to buy. The CMA believes that the Merger could, therefore, significantly weaken Microsoft's closest rival, to the detriment of overall competition in console gaming.

- As the market for multi-game subscription gaming services grows, Microsoft could use its control over ABK content to foreclose rivals, including recent and future entrants into gaming as well as more established players such as Sony. Absent the Merger, ABK games would in principle be available to any multi-game subscription service.

- After the Merger, Microsoft would gain control of this important input and could use it to harm the competitiveness of its rivals. As the multi-game subscription market is still in its infancy, the effect of the Merger could be to tip or significantly increase concentration in the market in Microsoft's favour before future rivals have a chance to develop. The CMA therefore believes that the Merger gives rise to significant competition concerns in multi-game subscription services (including cloud gaming services, to the extent these are distributed through multi-game subscription services).

- Microsoft already has a combination of assets that is difficult for other cloud gaming service providers to match. By having a large and well-distributed cloud infrastructure, Microsoft will be able to host games on its servers on preferential terms and reach gamers throughout the world without having to pay a fee to third- party cloud platforms. By having Windows, the OS where the vast majority of PC games are played, Microsoft can stream games to Windows PCs without having to pay an expensive Windows licensing fee and may be able to design and test games made for Windows more effectively than rivals. And by having an existing console ecosystem, Microsoft has an existing user base of gamers to which it can promote its cloud gaming services, as well as a range of popular games that it can offer.

- The Merger would, therefore, bring together the company in a uniquely strong position to offer cloud gaming services with one of the industry's strongest gaming catalogues. The CMA is concerned that, by leveraging ABK's content and Microsoft's wider ecosystem, Microsoft will have an unparalleled advantage over current and potential cloud gaming service providers.

- The CMA therefore believes the Merger could substantially reduce competition in cloud gaming services.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/micr ... n-concerns

Full text (8 pages) - https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... cision.pdf

Image
User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Monkey Man » Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:10 pm

twitter.com/xboxp3/status/1565314009133420544


Image
User avatar
jawa_
Member
Joined in 2021

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by jawa_ » Thu Sep 01, 2022 2:14 pm

"We intend to publish our games everywhere on Game Pass!

Oh, and Call of Duty will be available on PlayStation."

User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Photek » Fri Sep 02, 2022 10:22 am

jawa_ wrote:"We intend to publish our games everywhere on Game Pass!

Oh, and Call of Duty will be available on PlayStation."


UK's CMA's investigation wording is kinda crazy, more ore less expecting Xbox to be happy with being third, it's almost like Sony wrote the whole thing and I'm only talking after watching Hoeg Laws video, he thinks it's a very strange stance.

It's basically: Sony and Nintendo will be hurt by competition.... :lol:

That's kinda the point! :fp:

Image
User avatar
jawa_
Member
Joined in 2021

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by jawa_ » Fri Sep 02, 2022 10:27 am

I think it's a very clever play by Microsoft. True, right now they are probably third in the market globally... but with their financial muscle they're easily in pole position and they could really step up with that whenever they want to.

Three years down the line... oh! We're leading the market through buying *everything*! How'd a lil' ol' company like us do that?

User avatar
rinks
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Aboard the train that goes around the world

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by rinks » Fri Sep 02, 2022 10:30 am

But it's totally fine for Sony to pay to prevent parts of CoD from appearing on Xbox.

User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Monkey Man » Sat Sep 03, 2022 7:59 am

“In January, we provided a signed agreement to Sony to guarantee Call of Duty on PlayStation, with feature and content parity, for at least several more years beyond the current Sony contract, an offer that goes well beyond typical gaming industry agreements,” says Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer in a statement to The Verge.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/2/23334 ... n-blizzard

Maybe announced as exclusive at the next Xbox console announcement? If the various regulators allow it.

Image
User avatar
Dual
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Dual » Sat Sep 03, 2022 8:28 am

Totally clears Microsoft, thank you!

User avatar
jawa_
Member
Joined in 2021

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by jawa_ » Sat Sep 03, 2022 8:43 am

MS really are trying to have this both ways; on the one hand it's "games should be on all platforms!" but, on the other, "...as long as that's only Game Pass".

As they try to cover over things with seemingly positive statements, it's clear that we're gonna have to dig below those to work out what is actually happening.

User avatar
Saint of Killers
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Saint of Killers » Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:17 am

MS should just throw Sony and the competition authorities a bone by confirming CoD will continue to release on PS this gen. That gives Sony all but a guarantee on money they were banking on coming in, while also giving them time to plan for a future without CoD and the authorities can point to CoD remaining multi-platform for the short/medium term. MS may lose out in the short-term (debatable) but potential customers are still gonna see huge value in buying into Xbox/Game Pass thanks to the addition of the ActiBlizz catalogue on top of all the other positives and down the line they'll have every right to make CoD a full exclusive.

User avatar
more heat than light
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: mhtl
Location: Leicestershire

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by more heat than light » Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:29 am

Saint of Killers wrote:MS should just throw Sony and the competition authorities a bone by confirming CoD will continue to release on PS this gen.


They have. Repeatedly.

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:MHTL is an OG ledge
User avatar
gaminglegend
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: North East, UK

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by gaminglegend » Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:42 am

more heat than light wrote:
Saint of Killers wrote:MS should just throw Sony and the competition authorities a bone by confirming CoD will continue to release on PS this gen.


They have. Repeatedly.

I don’t understand why people keeping mentioning this as if MS are suddenly going to rip up contracts and have Call of Duty on Gamepass only. Mental

Check out the GRCADE Beer Money Thread - Free share (with Robinhood), £20 with HSBC new app Zing & Bank Switch Offers £££! :msgreen:
https://grcade.co.uk/t:the-making-beer-money-thread
User avatar
jawa_
Member
Joined in 2021

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by jawa_ » Sat Sep 03, 2022 9:50 am

I think the concern is that whilst Microsoft have said that CoD will continue to be on PlayStation, there are clauses:

> Sony and Activision signed a CoD marketing deal but we don't know his long this was for; neither Sony nor MS are saying
> MS has said that they'll publish the game on PlayStation for "several years"

It's a bit unclear as to what this means in terms of time but it seems reasonable to assume that CoD will appear on PlayStation for around three or four years; when it will then likely become a Game Pass exclusive.

User avatar
OrangeRKN
Community Sec.
Joined in 2015
Location: Reading, UK
Contact:

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by OrangeRKN » Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:40 am

It doesn't need to be exclusive to benefit MS, that's the thing. We're so used to exclusives being the differentiator, but game pass being a subscription service is the differentiator. Keep COD multiplatform so as not to risk alienating any of the audience, but draw players over to game pass where they can play the new COD every year for the price of their sub as opposed to buying it at £70 a pop. Plus COD still makes money off those diehard PS fans who were never going to switch anyway, and MS come out looking good.

Image
Image
orkn.uk - Top 5 Games of 2023 - SW-6533-2461-3235
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Photek » Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:45 am

Yeah, as others have said, putting it on Gamepass day one and having all the marketing rights to tell people this will be enough to ‘allow’ it on PS5.

Image
User avatar
more heat than light
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: mhtl
Location: Leicestershire

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by more heat than light » Sat Sep 03, 2022 11:48 am

I mean, a lot of people (myself included) thought this would be the case with the Bethesda stuff too. Difference here is that they've been pretty open about continuing to release on PlayStation, at least for the next few years.

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:MHTL is an OG ledge
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Photek » Sat Sep 03, 2022 12:14 pm

more heat than light wrote:I mean, a lot of people (myself included) thought this would be the case with the Bethesda stuff too. Difference here is that they've been pretty open about continuing to release on PlayStation, at least for the next few years.

Jeff Grubb said it was based on financial calculations that they made most exclusive in the Bethesda deal so it was in the table…

Image
User avatar
rinks
Member
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Aboard the train that goes around the world

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by rinks » Sat Sep 03, 2022 1:50 pm

I don’t see how Sony have a case anyway, when they have the option of allowing Game Pass on PlayStation.

User avatar
Mafro
Moderator
Joined in 2008
AKA: based
Contact:

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Mafro » Sat Sep 03, 2022 2:44 pm

Is Starfield exclusive?

Fisher wrote:shyguy64 did you sell weed in animal crossing new horizons today.

Twitter
User avatar
Pedz
Twitch Team
Joined in 2009
Contact:

PostRe: Microsoft buy Activision Blizzard for $70B.
by Pedz » Sat Sep 03, 2022 2:46 pm

Yes.

Image

Return to “Games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cumberdanes, Godzilla, Google [Bot], Holpil, OldSoulCyborg, Ploiper, poshrule_uk, Robbo-92, TonyDA and 532 guests