GRcade

Cal wrote:

$ilva $hadow wrote:You've been undercover defending the whole time by trying to compare it to the situations like "what if he had taken a boy" or "what if it was a woman taking a boy" or even "what if they were closer in age".

Okay, so admit, it $ilva: now you're just plain lying. I think, having gone back over my posts in this topic just to be sure, that that is the only conclusion we can reasonably draw from your comments. So you're now making up slurs and accusations to prove some kind of twisted point.

1. I have never raised the question of 'what if he had taken a boy'. Fact.
2. I have never raised the question of 'what if it was a woman taking a boy'. Fact.
3. I have never raised the question of 'what if they were closer in age'. Fact.

Will you now cease attempting to attribute words to me that I have never written?

Cal wrote:Interestingly, Sky TV News just reported that the French authorities are not treating this as a criminal case (but as a 'missing persons' case) - since no crime has actually been reported. Sky also reported that since the age of consent in France is indeed 15, there is no legal cause for the French police to treat the 30-year old man as a criminal. Most interesting. So we have a situation whereby if the pair presumably stay in France nobody can (or even wants to) touch them; but if they return back to the UK the bloke loses his teaching career, goes onto the SOR and might even face a jail sentence - whilst the girl no doubt gets 'safeguarded' into the social services as a 'victim'.

One of the few times I have to admit that perhaps the French might in fact have a more enlightened approach.

Cal wrote:

Lagamorph wrote:Cal, are you honestly saying that the girl is in no way any kind of a victim here?

The French don't seem to think so.

Poser wrote:

Cal wrote:
Let's just imagine, for the sake of illustrating your bigoted, spiteful nature, that I am actually cavorting about with a lithe young 16 year-old boy. Let's imagine, further, that I have his full consent.

Cal, I, for one, didn't read that first bit and assume you were raping him. Odd that you would require 'further imagining' to reach that point.

EnragedYogi wrote:

Red wrote:

Lagamorph wrote:

Red wrote:

Lagamorph wrote:

Scotticus Erroticus wrote:

Lagamorph wrote:

Memento Mori wrote:Her life's pretty much ruined. She can hardly go back to school can she?

In a years time nobody will even remember her. She'll be able to get on with life just fine provided the guy hasn't put her through some traumatic experience, which it doesn't appear he has.

It's Emily Forrest that I feel sorry for. She made the mistake of marrying an Aberdonian, but to have him run away with a tiddler must be harrowing.

More than likely she'll sell her story and make a mint.

What makes you say that?

It's pretty much the norm in these kind of situations. Someone will sell their story when the right offer comes along from the tabloids, and hers will likely be highly sought after by the vulturistic media.

That seems a rather crass assumption.

Another way to look at it is a nice friendly journalist will show up and offer her parents the chance to put their/her side of the story across. And £150k for their time.

Falsey wrote:So has this chick given her thoughts yet?

abcd wrote:

Falsey wrote:So has this chick given her thoughts yet?

Max Clifford has told her to save it till next years Celebrity Big Brother.