Most Disappointing Sequels

PostRe: Most Disappointing Sequels by **aayl1** » Tue Apr 07, 2020 11:13 am

I think you guys are essentially arguing over the definition of "interactive".

PostRe: Most Disappointing Sequels by **Jenuall** » Tue Apr 07, 2020 11:33 am

aayl1 wrote:I think you guys are essentially arguing over the definition of "interactive".

That's basically how I ended my post earlier:

Jenuall wrote:I think the biggest factor is going to be what kinds of interaction people find most engaging and enjoyable - I definitely get how to some people skulking around in the shadows is not that much fun and feels like they are "doing nothing" but for others like me that kind of gameplay is thrilling in a way that run and gun stuff can't match.

PostRe: Most Disappointing Sequels by **aayl1** » Tue Apr 07, 2020 1:13 pm

yeah but i said it better

PostRe: Most Disappointing Sequels by **Jenuall** » Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:10 pm

Pfft.

7256930752 · PostRe: Most Disappointing Sequels by **7256930752** » Tue Apr 07, 2020 2:33 pm

That's quite an interesting argument. I'm leaning more towards what OR is saying in this instance but we've had discussions about BOTW in the past and the systems and physics of that game world were the example of what made it so special and different to everything else but none of those things actually impacted on my play through in any meaningful or memorable way. I can see how you could play a stealth game and rather than seeing the huge amount of possibilities, you just stick to the same old two or three tried and tested methods to progress.

Most Disappointing Sequels

Who is online

Affiliates