Roonmastor wrote:I've really enjoyed pulling this together, and hopefully some of you have had some fun following it during the summer break in the racing season. If I run this again, it'll probably be after the F1 season has finished in January, or in October/November if the season is effectively over and I have the time.
A few questions I have that your opinions would help on.
1) Are you happy with the season length and pacing?7 races sat about right for me to complete the season in two weeks or so, which is probably the fastest I could really run it. Perhaps that pacing was too much to get a lot of interaction in the thread. The season could go up to 12 races over a month and that would probably be my absolute maximum in terms of length. But 8 races over a month might work better for peoples schedules. Of course, it can run slower over an extended period of time.
The length and frequency of races was spot on. I liked that we weren't waiting ages between rounds. That said, more races and a longer season wouldn't hurt it for me.2) Are you happy with the race length?Currently this is set to be as short as possible. I can set it to medium or long. I think the short runs work well as that means the highlights videos don't drag on, but you could argue that the short nature means whatever team I'm running I can miss strategy on. From the comments in the thread, I think it's fair that things probably move a bit too fast in short races, and I'm happy to increase the length. This is an initial set up option, so we'll want to be sure what we pick because I can't change it between seasons.
Again, I think the length works well as it is. 20-25 minutes per race means it's not a huge chore to watch.3) The Teams?So I could edit the teams to name them after the actual F1 teams, or we could rename them to something new, or retain the current naming convention. The idea of having the teams named by people who 'run' them appeals, but there could be some bleed back to the original names/logos in places I can't amend in game. We could have team owners have some say over who drives in their team, livery colours, and vote on rule changes. Mind, no reason a team needs to be named after someone to do this. Higher interactions may necessitate a slower pace game or less races. It can also allow for some car customisation. I'm thinking of giving team owners a budget, allowing them to design a chassis, vote on rules and choose a designer from a mini-list.
If we keep things simple, did the performance balance seem reasonable between the GRcade Cup's cars?
I've got no opinion on this either way, so if people want to mess about with the team names, colours, liveries etc, then that's fine with me. The only downside is that it potentially makes it harder to see which team they've been based on (E.g Scuderia Rossini was clearly Ferrari), but that's about it.
Power balance seemed ok as far as I can tell. But I came 2nd so I might be a bit biased there.
4) Driver InputSo I allocated all the drivers to teams. I would like to actually get people to opt into the game and pick their own stats and traits. This would likely be a top two stats and bottom two stats and buying traits or further stats that make you better but more expensive for team managers to put in their team. If we were doing this, I'd probably have to limit the reporting down to a single series for my own sanity.
Not a bad idea. I will admit I did like the "hands-off" part of this where I was just watching. If we had to start making decisions I think it'll make things harder for you to run and I'm more likely to screw things up 5) Number of seriesI did all three series to increase the chances that forumites were included, and also to spread the level of participation required between highlights and looking at some images. Did people like following three concurrently, or was the main series sufficient for interest? I don't want to add workload if it isn't being valued. I guess this is the place to probably also ask if live streaming or pre-records are the way to go. I've chopped and changed this time round to get a feel for it, and I'm happy either way. Streaming is fastest, but has its risks.
It's really what works best for you to be honest. Streaming is great because it allows us to catch it as it happens, but ultimately it's a decision for you to take.6) Race rulesI can tweak the race rules as the game progresses but the one I'm interested in most is refueling (GRcup did not have refueling which limited strategy divergence) and also points distribution. Asia Supercup's 6 position scoring is naff, but I quite like the Euro points for every position. We can keep the F1 10 places, look at 8 places, and I think 12 places will probably exist in the game (I'll have to check).
Again, I'm happy enough with the rules as they currently are.7) SeasonsSo I won't continue this continuity of the game, unless there are overwhelming requests for it. The main reason being I can't implement some of the above stuff without breaking the current game. I can't reverse retirements, and I think people are reluctant to bump other people out of seats even though they may want to play. But the idea of having a racing continuity that can have 3 or 4 seasons could be quite fun. If people want this continuity to continue then let me know and I'll attempt it until something we want won't work. What I will do though, if this continuity isn't continued, is roll the season forward to see what happens in the in-game driver market as an epilogue of sorts. And we'll keep Vermilion as the reigning Champion in a new continuity.
I'm biased here since I did quite well, but I would like to continue on with the line-up we currently have. But if everyone else wants to wipe clean then that's cool.8) My teamBeing the player allowed me some advantage this season, probably linked to Chariot's Designer being massively OP once some of my other balance changes were applied. Would you want me to follow one team throughout the season, or jump between teams each race to keep me team agnostic. Not sure how game breaking that might be, but that would probably be my preference. Doing this might mean I need to be more active in race management. Alternatively, do you want me to follow one team and be more active in its management to try and help it get to the front?
It might be interesting to have the team that comes last in a given race get your attention in the next race? Kind like how teams in F1 get more wind-tunnel time for development the lower in the order they end up. That way teams that might benefit the most from a guiding hand get it?Ultimately I'll make my own mind up as I need to be engaged to actually pull this all together, but there isn't much point in pulling together something there isn't enough demand for. So throw your opinions at me!