Nomicade [Forum Game] It's all over

[Hexx]

An Aberration player may convert 2 points to place a posting restriction on another player for their next ten in-game posts. The posting restriction shall be submitted privately to OrangeRKN in a PM, who shall inform the target (and also gets to decide if the posting restriction is reasonable I guess) in a PM likewise.

Votes for: 2(Balladeer, Hexx)
Votes against: 1 (OrangeRKN)
Majority: +2

[OrangeRKN]

I propose a new rule:

Wherever relevant to the rules of the game, the value of Pi shall be taken as exactly 3.2.

Votes for: 1 (OrangeRKN)
Votes against: 0 ()
Majority: +1

I think currently in voting we have proposed rules from Hexx, Devlin, Balla and myself?

[That]

+1 Balla's "More Work for OR Rule"
+1 for Devlin's "Dan Rule"

[Jenuall]

We need an Investigators power rule now to go along with the Aberration one...

[Hexx]

Balla's "More Work for OR Rule""

Majority notw for that I think

[That]

We need an Investigators power rule now to go along with the Aberration one...

Two points to check someone's team?

[Jenuall]

We need an Investigators power rule now to go along with the Aberration one...

Two points to check someone's team?

Sounds good, I'll second that.

[Cheeky Devlin]

Just realised I didn't vote for my own rule.

+1 for that and all the other rules on the table.

[OrangeRKN]

Votes for: 2 (Balladeer, Hexx, Karl)
Votes against: 1 (OrangeRKN)
Majority: +2

That's only a majority of 2 at the moment by my count?

[Cheeky Devlin]

Votes for: 2 (Balladeer, Hexx, Karl)
Votes against: 1 (OrangeRKN)
Majority: +2

That's only a majority of 2 at the moment by my count?

And me makes 3.

[Balladeer]

I propose a new rule:

Wherever relevant to the rules of the game, the value of Pi shall be taken as exactly 3.2.

Votes for: 1 (OrangeRKN)
Votes against: 0 ()
Majority: +1

This can get floated. I believe it's still at 1 as Devlin voted it up.

I'll put Jenuall's at +3 too.

[Cheeky Devlin]

Dan name change...
For: Jenuall, Karl, Cheeky,
Against:
Majority +3

[Oblomov Boblomov]

I vote in favour of all rules proposed.

[Balladeer]

Okay, let's make this a game:

If between them the Investigators have more than 30 points, and an Investigator posts, 'WIN!' in thread (all block caps), the Investigators win Nomicade. If the Investigators do not have 30 points, the caller loses ten points (going into minus figures if necessary). The Investigators cannot win if one of their number has minus points.

As an Investigator I approve of this idea.

[Oblomov Boblomov]

I got the role of vigilante.

I propose for Denster to be automatically shot if he ever enters this game.

[That]

What's the win condition for the Aberrations?

[OrangeRKN]

Balla and Devlin rules are both now in the OP. I'm not sure the state of any others because people haven't kept counts.

We need an Investigators power rule now to go along with the Aberration one...

Two points to check someone's team?

Sounds good, I'll second that.

Someone needs to propose some actual text for this rule before it can get voted in.

[That]

New rule:
OrangeRKN must independently count all votes as soon as reasonably possible after they are cast

Sorry OR

[OrangeRKN]

I'm going to dismiss my proposed Pi vote so I can propose another:

Following the introduction of this rule, when a rule is adopted, if any players on team Aberrations voted against the rule, it will have a 50% chance of appearing in the ruleset in the opening post in red text, as determined by a coin flip by OrangeRKN.

Seems like a decently balanced way of trying to reveal Abberation's identities?

[Balladeer]

I was thinking that somebody could suggest a wincon for the Mafia Aberrations. I'm happy to do so if nobody else fancies it! But y'all will need to vote my Investigators' WinCon in first.

Alternatively I could go for OR's suggestion. This isn't a vote, not yet - it's a... finger of approval. But shouldn't they we be using our Karlvestigative powers to determine the Aberrations?