GRcade

1cmanny1 wrote:He had a baby ffs!

He might have launched the baby at the police.

1cmanny1 wrote:I don't think you guys are really putting yourselves in that situation...

He had a baby ffs!

So you'd shoot towards the baby just because you think the phone in the guys pocket might be a gun?

No, I would let him take it back into the house and let him do god knows what to it...

If they had to lay siege to that house, it would be much more dangerous to the baby, and officers. I don't know, maybe in the UK you have a crime free paradise where nothing like this ever happens, so you can't figure out why someone would have to make a split second decision.
In the US they are trained to shoot people before they get shot themselves. They aren't going to stand around yelling for hours. And in that country I don't blame them.

Maybe a better outcome could have been achieved, who knows? But I think this one was acceptable due to the circumstances.

Wounding someone who is aggressive, carrying a child and might have a gun, could be dangerous.
But it could very well have been a better option. However, in that split second , you won't have time to figure out all those options.
Plus, didn't it say he held the baby down away from his head? Might be more risky shooting his body.

And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

You'd think that they'd have to be sure he had a weapon first before shooting. Rather than "hey, there's something in his pocket, shoot to kill!"

Makes me think of Fox News claim that Norway isn't a democracy because the police don't carry guns.

TheTurnipKing wrote:Makes me think of Fox News claim that Norway isn't a democracy because the police don't carry guns.

That can't be real, seriously? That is a new low for America if it is.

Scotticus Erroticus wrote:

TheTurnipKing wrote:Makes me think of Fox News claim that Norway isn't a democracy because the police don't carry guns.

That can't be real, seriously? That is a new low for America if it is.

I so wish the guy pulled her up on that.

TheTurnipKing wrote:Makes me think of Fox News claim that Norway isn't a democracy because the police don't carry guns.

So that makes us not a democracy either then?

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

Something that was to do with keeping a loaded gun in their house at all times was a constitutional right.

Andrew Mills wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

Something that was to do with keeping a loaded gun in their house at all times was a constitutional right.

Ah. Well, maybe... if I'm any good at shooting it.

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

Something that was to do with keeping a loaded gun in their house at all times was a constitutional right.

Ah. Well, maybe... if I'm any good at shooting it.

It's a fairly simple point and click interface.

The US should have nationwide rioting and looting to send a strong message to the government about how they feel.

Because, that's how it's done, right?

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

Something that was to do with keeping a loaded gun in their house at all times was a constitutional right.

Ah. Well, maybe... if I'm any good at shooting it.

It's a fairly simple point and click interface.

There's no reticule in the middle of my vision though, nor am I equipped with a Pip-Boy with VATs.

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

Something that was to do with keeping a loaded gun in their house at all times was a constitutional right.

Ah. Well, maybe... if I'm any good at shooting it.

It's a fairly simple point and click interface.

There's no reticule in the middle of my vision though, nor am I equipped with a Pip-Boy with VATs.

It does have an Aim-down-the-sights mode though.

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Somebody Else's Problem wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:

Alvin Flummux wrote:

Andrew Mills wrote:And I watched Bowling for Columbine lst night on Netflix, so this doesn't surprise me in the slightest (still strawberry floated up though).

Best of luck with the US of A Alvin, might want to take advantage of their 2nd ammendment

Eh? What now?

Something that was to do with keeping a loaded gun in their house at all times was a constitutional right.

Ah. Well, maybe... if I'm any good at shooting it.

It's a fairly simple point and click interface.

There's no reticule in the middle of my vision though, nor am I equipped with a Pip-Boy with VATs.

It does have an Aim-down-the-sights mode though.

Ah... uh... yeah okay.

Lack of bullet time makes shootouts far less dramatic in real life.