Politics Thread 6

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Who will you vote for at the next General Election?

Conservative
16
10%
Labour
64
41%
Liberal Democrat
28
18%
Green
22
14%
SNP
16
10%
Brexit Party
4
3%
UKIP
2
1%
Plaid Cymru
3
2%
DUP
1
1%
Sinn Fein
2
1%
The Independent Group for Change
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 158
User avatar
Godzilla
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Godzilla » Tue Oct 20, 2020 2:01 pm

It's a brilliant show too. Having a huge amount of representation for women and ethnic minorities. It's just a classic case of the Mail getting hold of a sound bite and asking people to complain.

First question when people complain should be "did you see the show in question, when was it on, what channel?" As all of the complainers were just being told to be annoyed.

Wish my image sig would work
User avatar
Winckle
Technician
Joined in 2008
Location: Liverpool

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Winckle » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:21 pm

twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1318554028784160774



More government sources direct and unfiltered.

We should migrate GRcade to Flarum. :toot:
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:32 pm

She's not an independent journalist, she's a press secretary for the Government.

Image
User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Lex-Man » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:45 pm

Can anyone explain why the government or Burnham announce what actually happened, surely the public have a right to know? I've heard that Liverpool were given better terms than Manchester as well which seems odd.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Oblomov Boblomov » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:52 pm

Laura Kuenssberg: "The government said it was like this, but the Greater Manchester leaders said it was actually like this."

Where is the bias? How does that constitute her acting as a government press secretary?

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:56 pm

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Laura Kuenssberg: "The government said it was like this, but the Greater Manchester leaders said it was actually like this."

Where is the bias? How does that constitute her acting as a government press secretary?


She's not quoting the government. She's quoting "government sources".

User avatar
<]:^D
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by <]:^D » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:57 pm

GrCade source says "Oblo Blob a guidable fool" who should "stick to Games chat"

;)

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Oblomov Boblomov » Tue Oct 20, 2020 3:58 pm

Moggy wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Laura Kuenssberg: "The government said it was like this, but the Greater Manchester leaders said it was actually like this."

Where is the bias? How does that constitute her acting as a government press secretary?


She's not quoting the government. She's quoting "government sources".

She's also quoting Greater Manchester sources. Is she their press secretary too?

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:05 pm

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Laura Kuenssberg: "The government said it was like this, but the Greater Manchester leaders said it was actually like this."

Where is the bias? How does that constitute her acting as a government press secretary?


She's not quoting the government. She's quoting "government sources".

She's also quoting Greater Manchester sources. Is she their press secretary too?


I never made the press secretary comment.

But she certainly acts like a government mouthpiece a lot of the time. Her schtick is "a government source said..." but really she's just pushing Cummings propaganda.

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by That » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:10 pm

I think good journalism would have been to ask a lot of people who have knowledge of the meeting, independently, and try to piece together what actually happened - then report that. If Burnham's people are saying "GM leaders were unanimously opposed", and Cummings with big glasses and a fake moustache government sources are saying "all the GM leaders wanted to take our offer but Burnham blocked it to spite us", then one of those accounts is factually true. She could go and talk to people and try to work out who is lying.

Image
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:16 pm

Karl_ wrote:I think good journalism would have been to ask a lot of people who have knowledge of the meeting, independently, and try to piece together what actually happened - then report that. If Burnham's people are saying "GM leaders were unanimously opposed", and Cummings with big glasses and a fake moustache government sources are saying "all the GM leaders wanted to take our offer but Burnham blocked it to spite us", then one of those accounts is factually true. She could go and talk to people and try to work out who is lying.



Exactly. Government sources = Cummings has told her what to say. That's not journalism, that's a mouthpiece for the Government.

Image
User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Lex-Man » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:31 pm

Surely, it's possible that the government sources just misread the room. It's not like the other MC people on the zoom call or whatever would say, "Yeah, we'd take your offer but Burnham isn't happy."

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:41 pm

Lex-Man wrote:Surely, it's possible that the government sources just misread the room. It's not like the other MC people on the zoom call or whatever would say, "Yeah, we'd take your offer but Burnham isn't happy."


Does that sound like our government?

User avatar
Kezzer
Member
Joined in 2012

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Kezzer » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:43 pm

sure but that should not be presented as fact

This post is exempt from the No Context Thread.

Tomous wrote:Tell him to take his fake reality out of your virtual reality and strawberry float off


Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Lex-Man » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:26 pm

Moggy wrote:
Lex-Man wrote:Surely, it's possible that the government sources just misread the room. It's not like the other MC people on the zoom call or whatever would say, "Yeah, we'd take your offer but Burnham isn't happy."


Does that sound like our government?


My thinking is that it might be a senior Civil Servant rather than an elected politician.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:36 pm

Lex-Man wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Lex-Man wrote:Surely, it's possible that the government sources just misread the room. It's not like the other MC people on the zoom call or whatever would say, "Yeah, we'd take your offer but Burnham isn't happy."


Does that sound like our government?


My thinking is that it might be a senior Civil Servant rather than an elected politician.


His name's Dominic Cummings.

User avatar
Tafdolphin
RETURN POLICY ABUSER
RETURN POLICY ABUSER
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tafdolphin » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:42 pm

Johnson asked multiple times about the £60m, keeps refusing to answer.

---------------------------
Games wot I worked on:
Night Call: Out now!
Rip Them Off: Out now!
Chinatown Detective Agency: 2021!
EXOGATE Initiative: Early Access Summer 2021
t: @Tafdolphin | Twitch: Tafdolphin
User avatar
Godzilla
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Godzilla » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:46 pm

The fact that we all know about lockdowns, tiers and masks weeks before they are announced verbatim shows the highest level of government is leaking.

Otherwise it is an enormous national security issue. They haven't stopped the leaks, pursued the leaker or called in the police to find the bug in Downing Street.

It's the new norm, parliament ignored and the sun and mail used to get the public used to ideas. It is genius as the opposition can't complain about a policy as it's just a rumor, then by the time it comes out the public is resigned to it.

Wish my image sig would work
User avatar
<]:^D
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by <]:^D » Tue Oct 20, 2020 5:47 pm

um Godzilla you just explained why its government policy not an actual leak :lol:

User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Cuttooth » Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:43 pm

twitter.com/PickardJE/status/1318627367196237827



Tories going after all the cities at this rate.


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addsy087, Benzin, Edd, floydfreak, Grumpy David, SEP, Spindash and 612 guests