Politics Thread 6

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Who will you vote for at the next General Election?

Conservative
16
10%
Labour
64
41%
Liberal Democrat
28
18%
Green
22
14%
SNP
16
10%
Brexit Party
4
3%
UKIP
2
1%
Plaid Cymru
3
2%
DUP
1
1%
Sinn Fein
2
1%
The Independent Group for Change
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 158
User avatar
Victor Mildew
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Victor Mildew » Mon May 16, 2022 4:33 pm

Yikes at Taff's ratio

Hexx wrote:Ad7 is older and balder than I thought.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Mon May 16, 2022 4:38 pm

Tomous wrote:Rory Stewart isn't even a Tory MP anymore is he?

Ls all the way down indeed :shifty:


Taf's basically French now so we have to make allowances. ;)

User avatar
Samuel_1
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Samuel_1 » Mon May 16, 2022 4:39 pm

Lex-Man wrote:Without getting in moral issues. It's just weird like at some level those jobs need to get done. Society would fall apart if everybody got better paid jobs as a lot of basic stuff wouldn't get done.

Absolutely, these jobs are so important, the 'get a better job' line is an insult. I thought the pandemic has changed such perceptions...?

Supporting My Local Mule Sanctuary Since 11/11/2014.

Donations welcome, please PM me to prevent unwarranted mule kicking.
User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Oblomov Boblomov » Mon May 16, 2022 4:53 pm

Lex-Man wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:It's still going really well for her over on Twitter... :lol: :lol: :lol:

twitter.com/redditchrachel/status/1526158811211386881



Wasn't it a live interview? It's not like they had a chance to cut up what she said?


She's deleted her tweet now :slol: after getting absolutely annihilated.

Her defence is that her comments were taken out of context and cherrypicked to make a headline instead of being considered alongside her whole response. Although that is what happened in very literal terms, you would have to be extremely generous to allow her to frame it in that way overall, as ultimately she did still say that people would be enabled to protect themselves from the cost of living by doing things like taking on more hours or getting a better [paying] job, thanks to some bullshit magical transformation of the economy the Tories are promising us :roll:.

Ideally, no one would live in poverty at all, no matter their circumstances, but the fact Tories are trying to normalise the idea of people working full-time and still living in poverty until they "better" themselves is utterly shameful.

Image
User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Lex-Man » Mon May 16, 2022 5:47 pm

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:
Lex-Man wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:It's still going really well for her over on Twitter... :lol: :lol: :lol:

twitter.com/redditchrachel/status/1526158811211386881



Wasn't it a live interview? It's not like they had a chance to cut up what she said?


She's deleted her tweet now :slol: after getting absolutely annihilated.

Her defence is that her comments were taken out of context and cherrypicked to make a headline instead of being considered alongside her whole response. Although that is what happened in very literal terms, you would have to be extremely generous to allow her to frame it in that way overall, as ultimately she did still say that people would be enabled to protect themselves from the cost of living by doing things like taking on more hours or getting a better [paying] job, thanks to some bullshit magical transformation of the economy the Tories are promising us :roll:.

Ideally, no one would live in poverty at all, no matter their circumstances, but the fact Tories are trying to normalise the idea of people working full-time and still living in poverty until they "better" themselves is utterly shameful.


I would suggest the whole interview is actually worse than the headline.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by KK » Tue May 17, 2022 10:41 am

Exclusive: Restaurants and bars in the House of Commons cut prices for MPs, as they were bailed out by taxpayers

Taxpayers have forked out £17m to subsidise bars and restaurants in the House of Commons over just three years, openDemocracy can reveal.

MPs have enjoyed cut-price meals, with the average cost of food in the Members’ Dining Room reduced by more than £1 between 2018 and 2021.

In fact, politicians could have a full three-course meal at the restaurant for as little as £10.41 last year.

This is despite all 17 of the bars and eateries in the House of Commons making huge financial losses – totalling £6.6m in the first year of the pandemic alone.

Data obtained by openDemocracy shows that every bar and eatery on the House of Commons estate made an overall financial loss in the three years up to 2020/21.

Menu prices were finally raised by 3.4% last month. But the new menus are still cheaper than most commercial competitors – and the rise is significantly less than the 5.9% inflation in food prices that has hit ordinary consumers.

Cheap food for MPs

Food and drink is so cheap in Parliament that nearby commercially run cafes and restaurants have been undercut.

Last year, MPs could buy a pint of beer in Parliament’s Strangers’ Bar for just £3.45 – compared to the London average of £4.84.

A margherita pizza in the House of Commons cost £3.51 less than it did at the closest Pizza Express.

And MPs could get a double espresso for £1.16 from a taxpayer-subsidised cafe – compared to £2.40 from a Cafe Nero that operates commercially in a parliamentary building.

Last year, the price of a glass of wine started at £4.26 in the House of Commons, compared to £6 at the local Red Lion pub today.

And fish and chips was just £6.41 in the Members’ Dining Room last year, compared to £18 in the pub today.

https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/food-p ... subsidies/

The drinks are literally on us.

Image
User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Preezy » Tue May 17, 2022 10:45 am

The House of Commons cafeteria. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue May 17, 2022 11:02 am

Preezy wrote:The House of Commons cafeteria. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.


I dunno, I bet the House of Lords cafeteria is pure filth.

User avatar
OrangeRKN
Community Sec.
Joined in 2015
Location: Reading, UK
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by OrangeRKN » Tue May 17, 2022 11:02 am

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:...but the fact Tories are trying to normalise the idea of people working full-time and still living in poverty until they "better" themselves is utterly shameful.


It's already normalised

Image
Image
orkn.uk - Top 5 Games of 2023 - SW-6533-2461-3235
User avatar
Victor Mildew
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Victor Mildew » Tue May 17, 2022 12:12 pm

Preezy wrote:The House of Commons cafeteria. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.


Corbyn shot first!

Hexx wrote:Ad7 is older and balder than I thought.
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Photek » Tue May 17, 2022 1:09 pm

twitter.com/Independent_ie/status/1526534794544398336



I f**king despise your Government!

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue May 17, 2022 1:11 pm

Photek wrote:

twitter.com/Independent_ie/status/1526534794544398336



I f**king despise your Government!


Imagine living under the banana splits.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Tue May 17, 2022 1:14 pm

twitter.com/Channel4News/status/1526280266616029188


Image
User avatar
Photek
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Dublin

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Photek » Tue May 17, 2022 1:15 pm

No fan of Biden but at least we have someone backing us.

twitter.com/BrexitBin/status/1524873768497209350



Why are the Tories siding with Racist, Homophobic and Pro Life banana splits over the vast majority of the people both in Northern Ireland and in the Republic?

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Tue May 17, 2022 1:16 pm

Photek wrote:No fan of Biden but at least we have someone backing us.

twitter.com/BrexitBin/status/1524873768497209350



Why are the Tories siding with Racist, Homophobic and Pro Life banana splits over the vast majority of the people both in Northern Ireland and in the Republic?


Because the Tories are racist, homophobic banana splits.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Tue May 17, 2022 1:23 pm

I was just going to say that :lol:

Image
User avatar
Qikz
#420BlazeIt ♥
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Qikz » Tue May 17, 2022 1:54 pm

The more I think about that MP yesterday who told people to just get better jobs the more it annoys me and reminds me why the 'bootstrap' rhetoric conservative politicians world over all use works. People who are maybe not struggling as much right now look at that messaging and think yeah, they're not poor because everything is strawberry floating them, they're poor because they're just not working hard enough, lazy poor people expecting everything given to them on a plate.

The Watching Artist wrote:I feel so inept next to Qikz...
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Hexx » Tue May 17, 2022 1:56 pm

Qikz wrote:The more I think about that MP yesterday who told people to just get better jobs the more it annoys me and reminds me why the 'bootstrap' rhetoric conservative politicians world over all use works. People who are maybe not struggling as much right now look at that messaging and think yeah, they're not poor because everything is strawberry floating them, they're poor because they're just not working hard enough, lazy poor people expecting everything given to them on a plate.


Precisely. It's insidious. It's a rallying cry for the affluent Boomers.

It makes poverty "your fault/choice" and something you deserve

The unspoken element is also therefore that the rich/well off therefore deserve their success/wealth = rather being the result of lifetimes of privilege and social injustices. Gotta keep the lie of meritocracy alive

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Tue May 17, 2022 1:57 pm

Simply put, anyone who is working a full time job should be to afford shelter, food and some nice things to enjoy in life while supporting their family.

Anything less is an absolute failure by the Government, not by the people struggling to get by.

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Hexx » Tue May 17, 2022 1:59 pm

Tomous wrote:Simply put, anyone who is working a full time job should be to afford shelter, food and some nice things to enjoy in life while supporting their family.

Anything less is an absolute failure by the Government, not by the people struggling to get by.


Absolutely not! They problem is today that people just want avocado toast handed to them while they watch a flat screen TV! A family? Shouldn't have had kids if they can't afford them! it's called parentlal responsibility - stop asking for hand outs!


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 612 guests