Politics Thread 6

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Who will you vote for at the next General Election?

Conservative
16
10%
Labour
64
41%
Liberal Democrat
28
18%
Green
22
14%
SNP
16
10%
Brexit Party
4
3%
UKIP
2
1%
Plaid Cymru
3
2%
DUP
1
1%
Sinn Fein
2
1%
The Independent Group for Change
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 158
User avatar
OrangeRKN
Community Sec.
Joined in 2015
Location: Reading, UK
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by OrangeRKN » Fri Jul 23, 2021 11:46 am

:lol:

What do you mean "roleplay"?

Image
Image
orkn.uk - Top 5 Games of 2023 - SW-6533-2461-3235
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Fri Jul 23, 2021 11:47 am

Image

TERFS never moved on further than that little kid.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Fri Jul 23, 2021 12:45 pm

twitter.com/peterjukes/status/1418511393641357315



Last May, she opened Newsnight with a monologue that stated “Dominic Cummings broke the rules” following the former chief adviser to Boris Johnson’s Barnard Castle visit during lockdown.

She added: “The country can see that, and it’s shocked the government cannot.”

The BBC issued a statement within a day saying that the introduction “did not meet our standards of due impartiality”.


:fp:

How does Laura K get away with being Cummings/Johnson's mouthpiece, while Maitlis gets rebuked for stating plain facts?

User avatar
Skarjo
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Skarjo » Fri Jul 23, 2021 12:46 pm

site23 wrote:
Skarjo wrote:Correct me if I’m wrong, but although we probably look at the phenotype to assume the sex, we only do that because it’s far easier than karotyping every individual, but we’re still assuming that the phenotype is a reflection of the genotypical sex. I’m pretty sure that sex still refers to the genotype, even if we assume it by looking at the phenotype, no? I think male and female are still statements of genotype even if we (absolutely wrongly in the exceptions you mention) will occasionally be wrong by judging it via the phenotype.

It's far more prevalent to refer to phenotypic sex in medical science. For instance, this article about a 46,XY woman who is fertile and gave birth to a 46,XY daughter uses the unsexed term "46,XY individuals" when talking about the general population with that karyotype, then explicitly and repeatedly uses the term "46,XY female" when referring to specific patients with an observable sex phenotype. That convention has been in use since modern research on these conditions began in the 60s.

Sex categorisation is context-dependent. You can define it in reference to chromosome configuration when it makes sense to you to do so. In scientific literature, even patients who have been karyotyped as 46,XX or 46,XY are usually referred to by their phenotypic sex - it's just considered a more useful and applicable definition.


By the way, if my reply came off as dismissive I didn’t mean it to. Those articles are really fascinating, cheers!

Karl wrote:Can't believe I got baited into expressing a political stance on hentai

Skarjo's Scary Stories...
User avatar
site23
Member
Joined in 2021

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by site23 » Fri Jul 23, 2021 12:50 pm

Skarjo wrote:By the way, if my reply came off as dismissive I didn’t mean it to. Those articles are really fascinating, cheers!

Not at all! The science of sexual development is a very complex and interesting field. I have a professional interest in it so I was glad to have an opportunity to share!

Image
Image
User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Memento Mori » Fri Jul 23, 2021 12:52 pm

Moggy wrote:

twitter.com/peterjukes/status/1418511393641357315



Last May, she opened Newsnight with a monologue that stated “Dominic Cummings broke the rules” following the former chief adviser to Boris Johnson’s Barnard Castle visit during lockdown.

She added: “The country can see that, and it’s shocked the government cannot.”

The BBC issued a statement within a day saying that the introduction “did not meet our standards of due impartiality”.


:fp:

How does Laura K get away with being Cummings/Johnson's mouthpiece, while Maitlis gets rebuked for stating plain facts?


Reporting what the government says is reporting even if most people with a brain would want that statement to be questioned not just copy/pasted. It's the fake neutral objectiveness the BBC traffics in.

Saying the “The country can see that" is an editorial judgment and not neutral. Even though the gist of the piece was completely true.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Fri Jul 23, 2021 12:58 pm

Presented without comment:

Image

Image
User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Memento Mori » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:00 pm

That shouldn't have been allowed either. Nor that strawberry floating picture of Sunak as Superman.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:03 pm

Tomous wrote:Presented without comment:

Image


Image

User avatar
Oblomov Boblomov
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Mind Crime, SSBM_God

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Oblomov Boblomov » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:05 pm

Eight council by-elections closed yesterday evening:

The Good
Tyn-y-nant - absolute steamroller of a Labour hold
Congresbury and Puxton - Green gain from Lib Dem (Lib Dem did not stand)
Liscard - strong Labour hold
Staines - Green hold that might possibly have been lost to Conservative without a progressive alliance
Fortune Green - strong Lib Dem hold, Tories in third place behind Labour

The Bad
Alkham and Capel-le-Ferne - Conservative hold (on paper a progressive alliance would have won but in reality the Con lead is too strong)
Cliftonville East - massive Conservative hold

The Ugly
Humberstone and Hamilton - Conservative gain from Labour

Tories win by 11%. Lib Dems and Green took 19% of the vote. No guarantee a progressive alliance would have worked, obviously, but it seems at least somewhat likely.

Image
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:07 pm

Moggy wrote:
Tomous wrote:Presented without comment:

Image


Image




They didn't colourize Williamson red or alter his hat to look more Russian though.

Image
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Squinty » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:13 pm

Tomous wrote:Presented without comment:

Image


I'm kinda amused that this is real.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:14 pm

Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Tomous wrote:Presented without comment:

Image


Image




They didn't colourize Williamson red or alter his hat to look more Russian though.


I'm pretty sure they didn't alter the hat. I agree on the changing the colour though.

User avatar
Victor Mildew
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Victor Mildew » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:19 pm

Looks like a real version of this
Image

Hexx wrote:Ad7 is older and balder than I thought.
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:21 pm

Moggy wrote:
Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Tomous wrote:Presented without comment:

Image


Image




They didn't colourize Williamson red or alter his hat to look more Russian though.


I'm pretty sure they didn't alter the hat. I agree on the changing the colour though.



You're right, it seems the consensus was the curve of the screen changed the shape of the hat. I would say it's a very deliberate choice of photo though.

Image
User avatar
Victor Mildew
Member
Joined in 2009

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Victor Mildew » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:26 pm

Corbyn is just a huge Tetris fan, leave him alone.

Hexx wrote:Ad7 is older and balder than I thought.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:26 pm

Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Tomous wrote:Presented without comment:

Image


Image




They didn't colourize Williamson red or alter his hat to look more Russian though.


I'm pretty sure they didn't alter the hat. I agree on the changing the colour though.



You're right, it seems the consensus was the curve of the screen changed the shape of the hat. I would say it's a very deliberate choice of photo though.


If you wear a hat that makes you look like a Soviet dictator, then it's your own fault. Especially if at the time you're saying "let's send these novichok samples to Moscow and ask if it's theirs!" ;)

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Squinty » Fri Jul 23, 2021 1:59 pm

Victor Mildew wrote:Corbyn is just a huge Tetris fan, leave him alone.


He's obviously a good player. He made rows of labour seats disappear.

User avatar
Green Gecko
Treasurer
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Green Gecko » Fri Jul 23, 2021 2:20 pm

Skarjo wrote:
Green Gecko wrote:I still find "biological sex is immutable" troubling. Doesn't that mean transsexualism is impossible or verboten? Is a trans woman who's had sex reassignment surgery then for example a "male woman"? That doesn't make sense at all to me. It just seems like LGBTQ people who reject transsexuals and don't accept that trans women or trans men are women/men or conversely female/male.


Biological sex *is* largely immutable. Sex is a chromosomal combo that's decided and assigned at the moment of fertilisation. XY makes you male, XX makes you female, and any of the other combos (XYY, XXY, XXX etc) would designate you as intersex. I've never heard of intersex being referred to as a slur myself, but it's definitely the correct biological term. However, I could be behind the times, because many correct medical terms have been adopted as slurs and then replaced by other terms.

Gender is a whole other thing, and is about how you present in society. The Venn Diagram of sex and gender has a massive amount of overlap but they are distinct things that fall outside that overlap. The term I hear used most at the moment is 'Assigned (sex) At Birth' to recognise that the person may now live as a different gender to the one you'd predict were they cisgendered. So you probably wouldn't say "a male woman" (but I don't actually think that's incorrect, but I know it's not the term usually used in the trans community), rather you'd simply call them a woman and if they needed further clarification you'd say 'Assingned Male at Birth'.

It's worth noting that a transwoman wouldn't need to have had reassignment surgery for woman to still be the correct term. She's a woman once she decides she wants to live as a woman regardless of what's in her genes or knickers.


Thanks for this as I know you have written about it before. The SDD/intersex person that got upset at me takes umbrage with the idea that they don't fall into the male/female binary, an idea I never expressed (I literally asked, "what about intersex people?", because they themselves believe in that binary (sex assigned at birth). It's horribly confusing that some people who have various chromosomal make ups actually believe in the sex and/or gender binary and want to be defined that way or perhaps have the right to define themselves that way, which of course they do, I never denied that or made any comment on that right. It's spectacularly presumptuous to label someone uneducated trans activist about that. I'm not a trans activist, I apparently replied to the wrong post on Twitter. :? I'm passively aware and sensitive to the issues.

And there are gay people who seemingly disapprove of transsexuals, or their arguments that they can change their biological sex, based on the chromosomal argument. That seems more like veiled ammunition for the hate phrase, "trans women/men can never be female/male" - regardless of their sex assigned at birth. I might be wrong, but on Twitter you have to be RIGHT OR WRONG and IT'S NOT AN OPINION IT IS PURE IMMUTABLE FACT *drops image macro, info graphic or single obscure source to prove this is a fact".

jesus

The whole thing just scares me and puts me off discussing and educating myself on issues that literally affect myself, which is... Homophobia/transphobia.

"It should be common sense to just accept the message Nintendo are sending out through their actions."
_________________________________________

❤ btw GRcade costs money and depends on donations - please support one of the UK's oldest video gaming forums → HOW TO DONATE
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Fri Jul 23, 2021 2:22 pm

Squinty wrote:
Victor Mildew wrote:Corbyn is just a huge Tetris fan, leave him alone.


He's obviously a good player. He made rows of labour seats disappear.


Image


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Balladeer, darksideby182, Garth, Grumpy David, Met, Miguel007, more heat than light, Zilnad and 575 guests