Politics Thread 6

Fed up talking videogames? Why?

Who will you vote for at the next General Election?

Conservative
16
10%
Labour
64
41%
Liberal Democrat
28
18%
Green
22
14%
SNP
16
10%
Brexit Party
4
3%
UKIP
2
1%
Plaid Cymru
3
2%
DUP
1
1%
Sinn Fein
2
1%
The Independent Group for Change
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 158
User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Cuttooth » Mon May 23, 2022 4:28 pm

The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Mon May 23, 2022 4:29 pm

Qikz wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:I genuinely think this could actually be it :shock: come on!!!!


They could release a photo of Johnson doing a line of cocaine on Prince Philip's corpse and there would still be Tory MPs on breakfast TV telling us that "he's getting all of the important calls right!".


Doing a line of cocaine off of the queens back while she's bent over prince phillips lifeless body and it wouldn't be enough - just think of how much worse it'd be under Corbyn!


Scruffy Corbyn wouldn't do a high class drug like cocaine. That commie bastard would be doing ket with tramps. :x

User avatar
Sprouty
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: SillySprout

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Sprouty » Mon May 23, 2022 4:30 pm

Photos are out! Just seen one of Boris, glass held up high! Imagine this will be shown constantly in the coming weeks.

The silly neighbourhood vegetable.
User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Preezy » Mon May 23, 2022 4:30 pm

Image

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Memento Mori » Mon May 23, 2022 4:35 pm

He was ambushed by a party he organised!

User avatar
Jenuall
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Jenuall
Location: 40 light-years outside of the Exeter nebula
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Jenuall » Mon May 23, 2022 4:37 pm

Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by DML » Mon May 23, 2022 4:38 pm

The most incredible thing is what this says about the MET. My god.

User avatar
Grumpy David
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Cubeamania

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Grumpy David » Mon May 23, 2022 4:40 pm

Oblomov Boblomov wrote:I genuinely think this could actually be it :shock: come on!!!!


The squeaky piglet seems to always squirm his was out of trouble!

"It was a special military boozing operation!"

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Mon May 23, 2022 4:42 pm

DML wrote:The most incredible thing is what this says about the MET. My god.


This is more damning of the MET than anyone.


It's pretty incredible they didn't see this happening either. Maybe they just don't care.

Image
User avatar
Sprouty
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: SillySprout

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Sprouty » Mon May 23, 2022 4:43 pm

Oh, seems I missed the boat posting my scoop!

These images will be on billboards at the next election if Boris is still in charge. The writing is on the wall, I would say it's now just about when the axe falls.

The silly neighbourhood vegetable.
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Mon May 23, 2022 4:45 pm

Sprouty wrote:Oh, seems I missed the boat posting my scoop!

These images will be on billboards at the next election if Boris is still in charge. The writing is on the wall, I would say it's now just about when the axe falls.




Yeah, it's a shame we're 2 years away from a GE really.

Image
User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Cuttooth » Mon May 23, 2022 4:46 pm

DML wrote:The most incredible thing is what this says about the MET. My god.


twitter.com/jessicaelgot/status/1528758109333819397



The rule at the time was two people maximum in a social gathering. Such a dogshit police force.

User avatar
Benzin
Member
Joined in 2011

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Benzin » Mon May 23, 2022 4:50 pm

They never learn.

And they'll get away with this one too.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Mon May 23, 2022 4:50 pm

Also, I like how what no one seems to be considering is that if you buy the "they were working!" excuse....this is how the highest office in the UK conduct work :lol: :fp:

Last edited by Tomous on Mon May 23, 2022 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Moggy » Mon May 23, 2022 4:52 pm

Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Imagine if the Met Police were in charge of the Epstein investigation.

"Yeah he was definitely trafficking children, but we can't do anything because he owned the island!"

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Hexx » Mon May 23, 2022 4:55 pm

Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Nah it's actually true - but it was fixed in May. People thought that might be why he wasn't fined for the Garden party work eventg

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Tomous » Mon May 23, 2022 4:55 pm

Moggy wrote:
Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Imagine if the Met Police were in charge of the Epstein investigation.

"Yeah he was definitely trafficking children, but we can't do anything because he owned the island!"



"Unfortunately Shipman owned the GP practice, our hands are tied sorry!"

Image
User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Hexx » Mon May 23, 2022 4:57 pm

DML wrote:The most incredible thing is what this says about the MET. My god.


You're surprised?

We're already getting the defense "The Met saw these pictures and didn't think he was breaking rules. MOVE ON!!!!"

System is working perfectly.

User avatar
Jenuall
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Jenuall
Location: 40 light-years outside of the Exeter nebula
Contact:

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Jenuall » Mon May 23, 2022 4:59 pm

Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Imagine if the Met Police were in charge of the Epstein investigation.

"Yeah he was definitely trafficking children, but we can't do anything because he owned the island!"



"Unfortunately Shipman owned the GP practice, our hands are tied sorry!"

:lol:

Hexx wrote:
Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Nah it's actually true - but it was fixed in May. People thought that might be why he wasn't fined for the Garden party work eventg

I can believe it's how they have spun it to avoid a fine, but lets be clear it's bullshit - "attendance" has strawberry float all to do with ownership of a property or whether you travelled somewhere! :lol:

I bet there are thousands of people up and down the country who (rightly) received fines for lockdown breaking events that happened on their own premises

User avatar
Hexx
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: Politics Thread 6
by Hexx » Mon May 23, 2022 5:00 pm

Jenuall wrote:
Tomous wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Imagine if the Met Police were in charge of the Epstein investigation.

"Yeah he was definitely trafficking children, but we can't do anything because he owned the island!"



"Unfortunately Shipman owned the GP
practice, our hands are tied sorry!"

:lol:

Hexx wrote:
Jenuall wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:The Met actually issued FPNs for this get together but not to Johnson. :lol:

People are claiming that there's apparently a loophole that he has been able to use where you can't "attend" something which is at your own property.


Which is clearly bullshit! :lol:


Nah it's actually true - but it was fixed in May. People thought that might be why he wasn't fined for the Garden party work eventg

I can believe it's how they have spun it to avoid a fine, but lets be clear it's bullshit - "attendance" has strawberry float all to do with ownership of a property or whether you travelled somewhere! :lol:

I bet there are thousands of people up and down the country who (rightly) received fines for lockdown breaking events that happened on their own premises

Oh it's legalese - but it was a genuine issue that was caused by the quick drafting of COVID regs that effected a fair few cases long before partygate.. But as I say it was fixed pretty quickly once they realised the oversight in language.


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Garth, GrinWithoutaKat, kerr9000, Peter Crisp, TonyDA and 398 guests