Lagamorph wrote:captain red dog wrote:Mick Lynch, from the interviews I have seen, seems to be just a normal working class guy fighting for workers rights. It's brilliant when someone like him can show up the Westminster political bubble fools. However, his time on air is limited beyond belief because even the BBC have a nasty allergy to anyone working class.
Does anyone know what the offer is from the rail companies and what the RMT is asking for? I've looked high and low, but all the articles on mainstream media don't go into details aside from current pay levels for some drivers and talking about disruption.
From what I understand the RMT are offering a 3% pay rise (So 7% below inflation) but it comes with redundancies as well.
Is it normal for redundancies to be linked to pay awards? I've seen a lot of negotiation between my union and my company (and my company is pretty aggressive in wanting to change conditions) but I've never seen them ask for redundancies to be considered.
The RMT would probably settle for 3.5% if redundancy was taken off the table. In my experience, union workers are conditioned to expect around 3.5% payrises even with inflation. My union were asking for 8% in negotiations, but every member I spoke to seemed to accept that we'd probably settle for 3.5-4% as long as the T and C changes were removed. As it happened, eventually the company agreed to 4% after we rejected two of their offers on ballot.
This really does seem like the rail companies are just flat out refusing to negotiate in good faith. Also, there can be no doubt this needs Government involvement as there should be a national plan on how to get rail use back to pre-pandemic levels, or a plan of how to effectively support a lower capacity service.
The government position is incredulous given what happened at P&O.