GRcade

[iup=3568478]Somebody Else's Problem[/iup] wrote:Oh god, Nigel Farage thinks he is the voice of England.

Did he really feel the need to stick his head above the parapet?

[iup=3568485]Hyperion[/iup] wrote:It annoys me from some Yes supporters saying that No voters weren't confident enough or were to scared to vote Yes.
How big headed and presumptuous of them.

Bear in mind a lot of those people are the kind of people who think Scotland is the greatest country in the world by virtue of the fact they were born there.

Nigel's statement

07:39
UKIP leader Nigel Farage tells BBC Radio 4's Today: "I'm writing to Scottish MPs to say please commit from today not to vote or debate at Westminster on English issues.

Sounds like he's a bit salty that they've got more say in English politics than he does.

[iup=3568485]Hyperion[/iup] wrote:It annoys me from some Yes supporters saying that No voters weren't confident enough or were to scared to vote Yes.
How big headed and presumptuous of them.

Yep. The self-proclaimed moral superiority of (hopefully) a minority of Yes voters has been pretty laughable. Nobody wants or supports poverty or inequality.

Absolutely strawberry floating gutted.

I was screaming at the radio he (Farage) came on this morning - him and his stupid opinions. I do not know why the BBC give him so much air time. I thought they were meant to be impartial.

I'm a little bit gutted for Scotland tbh hopefully they get given something. Although I would not put it past Cam the Man and his mates to ignore the whole thing. The strawberry floating snakes.

[iup=3568494]Eighthours[/iup] wrote:Yep. The self-proclaimed moral superiority of (hopefully) a minority of Yes voters has been pretty laughable. Nobody wants or supports poverty or inequality.

55% of Scotland might not have wanted to or meant to, but they just supported both.

Distasteful that the Highlands haven't even declared yet and now it's all "english votes for english laws". Give it an hour boys.

[iup=3568499]elite knight danbo[/iup] wrote:

[iup=3568494]Eighthours[/iup] wrote:Yep. The self-proclaimed moral superiority of (hopefully) a minority of Yes voters has been pretty laughable. Nobody wants or supports poverty or inequality.

55% of Scotland might not have wanted to or meant to, but they just supported both.

Of course they didn't.

[iup=3567464]Lagamorph[/iup] wrote:So if the vote is no, how long before Salmond starts throwing around accusations of fraud and vote rigging?

So how long was it?

Just woke up and saw the results.



I voted no. Edinburgh voting No was predictable, as was Glasgow voting yes

Good to see that it wasn't particularly close.

Looks like we're stuck with each other for another 300 years.

Can we have this forum back to normal now

Only 75% turnout in Glasgow

Happy you voted to stay with us Scotland

28/32 districts is pretty unanimous. Glad to see theyve appointed Lord Smith of Kelvin to get devolution ball rolling.

[iup=3568514]Herbi[/iup] wrote:Only 75% turnout in Glasgow

That's pretty shocking.

twitter.com/DDannoll/status/512810528352108544

[iup=3568514]Herbi[/iup] wrote:Only 75% turnout in Glasgow

Yeah but according to some reports people voted lots of times

Interesting to see contrasting Yes supporters today across the interwebs

"Whatever happened, we can be proud. Change will come, we did that. Engagement in the political process shows the will of the people"
vs
"We're strawberry floated. Utterly strawberry floated. Cowardly "country men" screwed us. Nothing will change. We're slaves still. Embarassed to be Scottish. Game over man! Game over!"

(Paraphrasing, and only slightly exaggerating)

Well done Scotland, not for the result necessarily but for the turnout.

Democracy