TCRT 7: Episode 2 - Attack of The Chat

OrangeReindeer wrote:It's incredible that every moon landing hoax "argument" has been categorically debunked for over 40 years and yet still here we are

It's irresponsible to perpetuate these conspiracies by giving them air time

pjbetman wrote:looks legit to me...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo16LM.jpg

EDIT: https://pixabay.com/en/moon-landing-apo ... rin-60543/

Bethlehemster wrote:Is Buzz Aldrin still alive? Send him to the jungle. So he can kick him in the bollocks.

Advent7 wrote:

pjbetman wrote:looks legit to me...


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Apollo16LM.jpg

EDIT: https://pixabay.com/en/moon-landing-apo ... rin-60543/

Not sure if should send ban request

"Around the outside of the earth is the Van Allen belt which is massively radioactive and the argument is you would have to build a spacecraft out of lead to protect the astronaut."

"What about the other questions? On their chests they wore the cameras which they took the photographs of the moon. In which was Kodak film; as you know there is no atmosphere on the moon. In direct sunlight it is something like 200 degrees yet Kodak film has an operating field of like 130 degrees...yet amazingly it all worked."

"Also the moon landing photographs! It appears to be lit from two sides. Can you explain that?"

"[Apollo 1 caught fire] because the Russians had already got into orbit and circulated the earth inside the Van Allen belt so the only way they could top it was to go to the moon and back. When they discovered they couldn't the only way to do it was to fake it."

KK wrote:Nick Knowles revealing the truth to millions on ITV...

"Around the outside of the earth is the Van Allen belt which is massively radioactive and the argument is you would have to build a spacecraft out of lead to protect the astronaut."

"What about the other questions? On their chests they wore the cameras which they took the photographs of the moon. In which was Kodak film; as you know there is no atmosphere on the moon. In direct sunlight it is something like 200 degrees yet Kodak film has an operating field of like 130 degrees...yet amazingly it all worked."

"Also the moon landing photographs! It appears to be lit from two sides. Can you explain that?"

"[Apollo 1 caught fire] because the Russians had already got into orbit and circulated the earth inside the Van Allen belt so the only way they could top it was to go to the moon and back. When they discovered they couldn't the only way to do it was to fake it."

pjbetman wrote:

KK wrote:Nick Knowles revealing the truth to millions on ITV...

"Around the outside of the earth is the Van Allen belt which is massively radioactive and the argument is you would have to build a spacecraft out of lead to protect the astronaut."

"What about the other questions? On their chests they wore the cameras which they took the photographs of the moon. In which was Kodak film; as you know there is no atmosphere on the moon. In direct sunlight it is something like 200 degrees yet Kodak film has an operating field of like 130 degrees...yet amazingly it all worked."

"Also the moon landing photographs! It appears to be lit from two sides. Can you explain that?"

"[Apollo 1 caught fire] because the Russians had already got into orbit and circulated the earth inside the Van Allen belt so the only way they could top it was to go to the moon and back. When they discovered they couldn't the only way to do it was to fake it."

He forgot the bit were they filmed themselves taking off from the moon...yet were still able to get the footage...that bit was fake clearly...who knows about the rest, but it seems dubious to me (at best)

Albear wrote:Was the incorrect shadow theory ever debunked?

I love me some conspiracies.

Albear wrote:Was the incorrect shadow theory ever debunked?

I love me some conspiracies.

pjbetman wrote:

KK wrote:Nick Knowles revealing the truth to millions on ITV...

"Around the outside of the earth is the Van Allen belt which is massively radioactive and the argument is you would have to build a spacecraft out of lead to protect the astronaut."

"What about the other questions? On their chests they wore the cameras which they took the photographs of the moon. In which was Kodak film; as you know there is no atmosphere on the moon. In direct sunlight it is something like 200 degrees yet Kodak film has an operating field of like 130 degrees...yet amazingly it all worked."

"Also the moon landing photographs! It appears to be lit from two sides. Can you explain that?"

"[Apollo 1 caught fire] because the Russians had already got into orbit and circulated the earth inside the Van Allen belt so the only way they could top it was to go to the moon and back. When they discovered they couldn't the only way to do it was to fake it."

He forgot the bit were they filmed themselves taking off from the moon...yet were still able to get the footage...that bit was fake clearly...who knows about the rest, but it seems dubious to me (at best)

pjbetman wrote:

OrangeReindeer wrote:It's incredible that every moon landing hoax "argument" has been categorically debunked for over 40 years and yet still here we are

It's irresponsible to perpetuate these conspiracies by giving them air time

I'd like to see this. Any links?

KK wrote:I’m a flat mooner.

Advent7 wrote:I don't want to live in this flat planet any more