I don't think writing a story about a demographic you aren't a part of is discriminatory, necessarily. I do think it's quite shortsighted and daft, though. It's also not indicative of the quality of the adaptation, either. To use an overt-to-the-point-of-daft example, what wars against the Russians has Kojima ever been in? But he knows all the terms and info necessary and, for the most part, people think that the more realistic parts of MGS when it comes to battle fatigue etc are pretty on point. Contrast that with the LGBT elements in Doctor Who by Russell Davies, a gay man who won awards for his gay-centred show Queer As Folk. The parts in Doctor Who were fkin embarrassing. I could've written better. Proper cringeworthy. But was it homophobic? Of course not, it couldn't be, right?
Yes, sometimes such attempts at writing stories on things you aren't directly involved in or affected by can be discriminatory and out to belittle and defame (see lesbianism in Born Innocent, which basically says "all lesbians are prospective prison rapists") but many aren't. The internet, I often say, is full of people who damage things with their good intentions, but honestly I do wonder if it's more like abuse of power. They can "cancel" huge stars and corporations now, after all. Remember the "cultural appropriation" BS from a few years ago? "You can't wear/eat/watch/listen to/like/do that because you're not from that country!" Absolute unchecked twatting LUNACY based in good intentions. (Oi Badman you can't say Lunacy because you aren't an ancient Greek) I'm a member of a minority and I'm so sick of people being "offended" on my behalf.
Just because no employees who worked on the game were trans (and maybe there are some who just aren't out?) doesn't make this game transphobic or even a poor adaptation of such subject matter - though granted it would increase the probability; the movie Burning Bright has a *hilariously* ill-researched depiction of autism. And I've just realised that that is the issue people have with this game: not that Dontnod didn't consult trans people and affiliates for their fact checking and input, but that they didn't actually employ them. Weird, frankly. And do we know that they didn't research? If they didn't, yes, blind and daft as I said, but still.
Did they work with modern high school photography students in order to better portray the emotions and obstacles they face in Life is Strange? Did they watch interviews of serial killers so as to not disrespect victims with their portrayal of their baddie? Dunno, but you'll notice there wasn't a huge uproar about it because neither of those are demographics you can fit into a buzzword to rally around and use as a soapbox for your own ego when you want to be self-righteous. These people do just as much damage in many ways to these demographics they're defending than the attackers, and should be ashamed. Too often a demographic is seen as a single hive-mind, and not millions of individual people. A trans person close to me doesn't care about the portrayal of the politics of game development on twitter and just wants to go outside without fear. Other trans people are doing the can can in a pride parade. I know the person I know will be very intrigued by Tell Me Why and I'm looking forward to seeing their reaction. They love Persona 4, for example, for its portrayals of minorities but hates 5 for the same reason, despite knowing that 4 was supposed to be the same - be it just how the writing fell, or maybe the translator did a Woolsey of it, for some reason 4 comes across far better. It's like that Forrest Gump rip off starring Christopher Lambert where a Cute Disabled Man blags his way into looking like a god among men but he's just like, wot.
Anyway, now for my originally planned post:
----
Tell Me Why, eh?
Opinions expressed in this post are those of RJ Badman and do not reflect the views of Bovril Fluid Beef Ltd.