The Comments Thread

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Rocsteady
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Rocsteady » Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:30 pm

Anything termed as either alpha or beta is automatically terrible.

Image
User avatar
Snowcannon
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Snowcannon » Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:55 pm

Rocsteady wrote:Anything termed as either alpha or beta is automatically terrible.


Spoken like a true beta

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by KK » Wed Sep 07, 2016 9:34 pm

CBS News, comments wrote:I am a 27 year military special operations veteran and will comment only on that, with regards to Trump.

1. The United States and Russia have had thousands of nuclear warheads pointed at each other for decades, yet everyone was absolutely safe. Why? Because the leaders of both countries were smart enough to know what would happen if a nulear war ever started. Trump does not comprehend that. His rhetoric shows that he thinks nuclear weapons are "just another weapon", has commented about "nuking them", and thinks all countries should have nuclear weapons. Under a Trump administration, the chances of a nuclear war somewhere in the World are significantly higher.

2. Trump likes to bad-mouth and alienate our allies. He does not understand that we need our allies as bad as they need us. In a World crisis, the US cannot "go it alone".

3. Trump has stated that, if the United States military comes to the aid of another country, that they will have to be able to "pay" for it. Military interaction is not about making money; it is about right and wrong; good and evil. To turn the US military into a mercenary-like, "for hire" force is unthinkable.

4. Trump's mouth will, and probably already has, multiplied the current 1/2 of 1% of the 1.3 billion Muslims in the World, radicalized against the West, by many many times. What he does not know is that a determined terrorist cannot be stopped, because they don't care if they die. If Trump is allowed to continue "representing the United States", you won't be able to go to a shopping mall or flea market in this country without looking over your shoulder and worrying about where the next bomb is going to go off.

And, those are only the military ramifications of a Trump Presidency.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/donald-trum ... se-policy/

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Sep 08, 2016 12:49 pm

Trump says that Putin is a better leader than Obama.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-37303057

We should prefer Putin to Obaama because he does not hate the UK as much as Obaama does because Putin does not think of himself as an eternal victim of the slave trade.


THE WORLD IS IN SEVERE DANGER WITH LEADERS LIKE THIS.

TRUMP
PUTIN
MUGABE

this, ladies and gentlemen, is what they refer to as the "New World Order"

AND YOU WILL COMPLY.


Yeah, the BBC is pro-Clinton. What a surprise.

It'd be nice to read articles that were unbiased and followed the royal charter guidelines from the BBC. But it has become an entity that was been infested with left-wing globalists who will only write good things about those who wish to enslave humanity with debt weapons and Roman Empire property law.

The BBC is anti-human.


BBC as usual so bias!! please start reporting news on Hillary illness! How on earth is she going to handle the pressure of the job if every time someone yells at her either she freezes or have a seizures!? why don't you report on that!?...or how about reporting about Clinton cash!? big youtube movie! and yet nothing on your website! ...instead try to put down Trump all the time! Shame on you!


Russia is the only world force willing and able to tackle IS. Free speech & human rights? Most of our MPs still think Rushdie's Fatwah was justified...

I'm voting Putin!


Dear BBC. Trump’s unflattering remarks were on Obama, not US military leaders. Your twisting of the facts are so obvious. I pay £160 a year for reporting news impartially, not for manufacturing "news". I will get rid of my TV and stop funding your propaganda machine.

User avatar
Trelliz
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Trelliz » Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:00 pm

Moggy wrote:
THE WORLD IS IN SEVERE DANGER WITH LEADERS LIKE THIS.

TRUMP
PUTIN
MUGABE

this, ladies and gentlemen, is what they refer to as the "New World Order"

AND YOU WILL COMPLY.


How the strawberry float is Mugabe part of the New World Order? Is he just running Zimbabwe into the ground ironically?

jawa2 wrote:Tl;dr Trelliz isn't a miserable git; he's right.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:10 pm

Trelliz wrote:
Moggy wrote:
THE WORLD IS IN SEVERE DANGER WITH LEADERS LIKE THIS.

TRUMP
PUTIN
MUGABE

this, ladies and gentlemen, is what they refer to as the "New World Order"

AND YOU WILL COMPLY.


How the strawberry float is Mugabe part of the New World Order? Is he just running Zimbabwe into the ground ironically?


STOP ASKING QUESTIONS AND COMPLY. YOU WILL COMPLY. YOU WILL COMPLY.

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by That » Fri Sep 09, 2016 12:31 pm

Trelliz wrote:Is he just running Zimbabwe into the ground ironically?


Le epic troller, Rusemaster Mugabe, strikes again.

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:52 pm

"Selective schools" might lead to a return to the grammar school system.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37303348

So Mrs May will allow eliteist schools but not points based and fairer immigration policy.


Well it damn well should be a return to the past. Once upon a time school kids left school with a modicum of knowledge between their ears


If you want your kids educated in a place without dozens of immigrants in every class using valuable learning time on needing extra help, language solutions, and religious 'tolerance' and pandering ... you're going to have to pay for it.


There should be more foreign speaking schools in England. How is someone whose 1st language is not English be able to get the most out of school?

No wonder standards are dropping


If we are going back to the 1950s why not rejoin the EU while we're at it?


The only reason the lefties don't want Grammar Schools is because most of the migrant kids wont speak good enough English to pass the 11+ to get in. Not the slightest interest in whether they would be better for our kids.

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by That » Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:55 pm

Moggy wrote:
The only reason the lefties don't want Grammar Schools is because most of the migrant kids wont speak good enough English to pass the 11+ to get in. Not the slightest interest in whether they would be better for our kids.


:lol: This one's really beautiful.

Image
User avatar
Trelliz
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Trelliz » Fri Sep 09, 2016 3:58 pm

Two books I think should be mandatory reading before posting in news comment sections:

Image
Image

jawa2 wrote:Tl;dr Trelliz isn't a miserable git; he's right.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Sun Sep 11, 2016 2:57 pm

Facebook have decided that photos of "napalm girl" can be posted.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37318040

People that like looking a naked 9 year old girls will be thrilled. Sick as.. : (


I'm appalled the BBC have posted a picture of this nature. They are a disgrace

Some things are better left un-said or un-seen. This is one of those occasions


It's 40 odd years ago. Wasn't even born. Who cares?


Who cares about the Chav entertainment olatform? You think the benefits street mob even know what this photois about?


Fury #1) Zuckerburg trying to cash in as the 'nice, reformed guy' in all of this. seething.

FURY #2) the disgusting decision to reverse the ban. IF THIS WAS YOUR CHILD IN THE PHOTO HOW WOULD YOU FEEL?

FURY #3) the fact the BBC looked for any lame excuse possible to do 2 separate HYS topics for Facebook today, just like they have to do for Apple (to meet pre agreed illuminati quotas)


...and surely it's the perverts that should be prevented from seeing naked 9 year olds??

User avatar
That
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Dr. Nyaaa~!
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by That » Sun Sep 11, 2016 3:05 pm

It amazes & frightens me that there are people out there that see the Napalm Girl photograph and think it's pornographic.

Image
User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by KK » Sun Sep 11, 2016 6:40 pm

The number 1 ranked comment on Hilary's fainting episode...

Daily Mail wrote:I would not put anything past the Trump camp given they are trying every dirty trick in the book to get Trump elected. Clinton should get her blood thoroughly tested to see if she's been drugged for a publicity stunt.

http://www.dailyfail.co.uk/news/article ... l#comments

This is one of the best conspiracies yet - Trump (and the Russians?) have drugged her. :slol:

Image
User avatar
Ironhide
Fiend
Joined in 2008
Location: Autobot City

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Ironhide » Sun Sep 11, 2016 10:46 pm

Karl wrote:It amazes & frightens me that there are people out there that see the Napalm Girl photograph and think it's pornographic.


Its rhe same group of people who were apparently offended by the swimming baby on the cover of Nirvana's Nevermind because you could see the silhouette of its tiny baby penis.

Later print runs even had it photoshopped out due to complaints.

Image
User avatar
Errkal
Member
Joined in 2011
Location: Hastings
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Errkal » Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:42 am

Ironhide wrote:
Karl wrote:It amazes & frightens me that there are people out there that see the Napalm Girl photograph and think it's pornographic.


Its rhe same group of people who were apparently offended by the swimming baby on the cover of Nirvana's Nevermind because you could see the silhouette of its tiny baby penis.

Later print runs even had it photoshopped out due to complaints.


They will be the sort of people that aren't offended themselves, but are being offended on behave of others.

User avatar
Preezy
Skeletor
Joined in 2009
Location: SES Hammer of Vigilance

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Preezy » Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:50 am

Moggy wrote:
FURY #3) the fact the BBC looked for any lame excuse possible to do 2 separate HYS topics for Facebook today, just like they have to do for Apple (to meet pre agreed illuminati quotas)

I love how it's just accepted that the illuminati insist of these kind of quotas :lol:

How does this person know this? Where can I read more on this subject?

User avatar
Trelliz
Doctor ♥
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Trelliz » Mon Sep 12, 2016 10:06 am

Preezy wrote:
Moggy wrote:
FURY #3) the fact the BBC looked for any lame excuse possible to do 2 separate HYS topics for Facebook today, just like they have to do for Apple (to meet pre agreed illuminati quotas)

I love how it's just accepted that the illuminati insist of these kind of quotas :lol:

How does this person know this? Where can I read more on this subject?



jawa2 wrote:Tl;dr Trelliz isn't a miserable git; he's right.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Mon Sep 12, 2016 12:28 pm

Tesla are going to release an update to make their cars safer.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-37335212

Recently I asked a bright young man in his 20's in the US what he thought of cars that did not need human drivers. He said "Why don't they invent something that makes us feel human instead of inventing things that make us feel dead.?"


"Tesla will update its cars' Autopilot function with new safety features designed to prevent collisions, the company has announced."

I would have thought this would be a key feature - not an update, collisions are generally a bad idea and should be avoided.

I would rather be a passenger is a car driven by Clarkson, than get behind a wheel of s driver-less car.


Anybody using / needing gadgets like this to help them drive, should never be allowed behind the wheel of a car in the first place


"But to even think of creating tech that takes responsibilities away from people is is irresponsible in itself."

What do you think a kettle does? It takes the responsibility of you having to heat water to boiling away from you...


The whole point of having a nice car is the driving experience. If I'm going to have a computer do it then I might as well use a robot to have sex for me. Also it's about time the major manufacturers started releasing purely electric cars, I know Volkswagon have promised to. It annoys me that a love himself tosspot like Elon Musk seems to be the only one making strides in that area.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Moggy » Tue Sep 13, 2016 7:47 am

Great British Bake Off moves to Channel 4.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37344292

LETS LOBBY TO BAN THE LICENSE FEE!!

TOGETHER WE CAN DO THIS!!!

PLEASE VOTE UP TO HAVE THIS BANNED.

IF WE CAN GET MORE THAN 100,000 up votes, I will present this to parliament.

AND I AM SERIOUS - PLEASE SPREAD THE WORD.

MEMO to the squares - please don't ruin this by voting down this comment, please just let us get on with this in a democratic way.


The whole concept of people watching other people make cakes, and turning baking into a competition, epitomises everything that is wrong with this country these days.

What next? Competitive dusting?

The Great British brass polishing?

Watching the Great British paint dry?

And to think, this rubbish is produced by people who call themselves "creative." Not a decent idea between them.


I don't know what programs on which channels the GBBO/BBC haters here watch or what they do to feed and enrich their minds, but I suspect the former is darts while latter is page 3. Of course what they hate the most about GBBO is that last year a smart, likeable, talented muslim woman won and that a smart, funny, gay woman co-presents the program. That upsets Wayne and Waynetta.


Good. Sick of seejing cookery programmes on the TV schedules along with the list of their egotysical presenters. Worse than watching paint dry. I do not need some primma donna telling me what tastes I should like. They are cooks for goodness sake nobel prize winners.


Pherhaps the contestants will now represent the uk rather than the bbc's insistence on 20% west Indian in every program.


It's just become a PC must look after the minorities programme, nothing to do with 'bake off' just another politically correct propaganda machine the BBC. In fact the BBC is now just a propograndea machine through and through, it's finished as a factual corporation it's more of a PC leftie manufactured bore


Not enough ethnic faces on it for the BBC to renew it I bet.


Maybe instead we can finally have some more programmes about transgender disabled gay black muslim vegans


Hahahahaha! This is too funny for me... You reap what you SOW BBC! Bastardizing, Biased Company.

Biased news reporting, tried to brainwash the public to vote Bremain, covers up KNOWN Paedophiles, loses FLOP gear (which it became when they fired Clarkson), and now loses GBBO.

The recent series of "Disastrous events" for the PC BBC is the icing on my cake, its like christmas has come early!!

User avatar
Return_of_the_STAR
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Comments Thread
by Return_of_the_STAR » Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:24 am

I can't believe the fury over this great British bake off move. Most dont realise that it was never made by the bbc but by an independent production company and that there's no reason for it to change by it moving channel four. Yes there will be adverts but so what.

Shoe Army

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Green Gecko, Grumpy David, Hesk, Lex-Man, massimo, Met, PatSharpsMullet, shy guy 64 and 437 guests