Brexit

Our best bits.

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

Remain a member of the European Union
222
80%
Leave the European Union
57
20%
 
Total votes: 279
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Moggy » Wed Feb 22, 2017 2:07 pm

Glowy69 wrote:Absolute banter when lots and lots and lots of leave voters who voted primarily for immigration, nothing changes :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


There will be changes, a lot of the thick banana splits that voted leave will end up poorer. :lol:

User avatar
Meep
Member
Joined in 2010
Location: Belfast

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Meep » Wed Feb 22, 2017 7:11 pm

One look at the demographic data broken down by age should be enough to convince anyone we cannot afford to dramatically reduce immigration any time soon, Brexit or no. I cannot honestly believe that there are many politicians who are not aware of the current time bomb coming down the generations but they are apparently choosing not to speak out because they are terrified of people like Dacre and Murdoch. Okay, might be a good electoral move, but is not good for the country. MPs need to start being honest with voters about the need for immigration. It would have been helpful if they had done this before the referendum but, hey, no use in crying over spilt milk.

User avatar
Grumpy David
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Cubeamania

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Grumpy David » Wed Feb 22, 2017 9:38 pm

Meep wrote:One look at the demographic data broken down by age should be enough to convince anyone we cannot afford to dramatically reduce immigration any time soon, Brexit or no. I cannot honestly believe that there are many politicians who are not aware of the current time bomb coming down the generations but they are apparently choosing not to speak out because they are terrified of people like Dacre and Murdoch. Okay, might be a good electoral move, but is not good for the country. MPs need to start being honest with voters about the need for immigration. It would have been helpful if they had done this before the referendum but, hey, no use in crying over spilt milk.


Isn't that just a ponzi scheme?

Once all the young people become old people, we then need an even larger younger population to pay for the even larger elderly population.

Reality is retirement ages need to go up and state pensions need to go down, but old people won't vote for that.

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by DML » Wed Feb 22, 2017 10:12 pm

Immigration = Lie

NHS = Lie

This is actually kinda hilarious.

User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Lex-Man » Thu Feb 23, 2017 7:08 am

Grumpy David wrote:
Meep wrote:One look at the demographic data broken down by age should be enough to convince anyone we cannot afford to dramatically reduce immigration any time soon, Brexit or no. I cannot honestly believe that there are many politicians who are not aware of the current time bomb coming down the generations but they are apparently choosing not to speak out because they are terrified of people like Dacre and Murdoch. Okay, might be a good electoral move, but is not good for the country. MPs need to start being honest with voters about the need for immigration. It would have been helpful if they had done this before the referendum but, hey, no use in crying over spilt milk.


Isn't that just a ponzi scheme?

Once all the young people become old people, we then need an even larger younger population to pay for the even larger elderly population.

Reality is retirement ages need to go up and state pensions need to go down, but old people won't vote for that.


The problem is that a lot of manual workers can't work much longer than they do already. If you're a plumber or electrician there is a definite hard cut off. The same for teachers, you can't keep teaching a class of 30 kids at 70.

The other problem is that with far more old people working it'll be harder to get a job. Espically with an increase in automation.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Rex Kramer » Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:00 am

Only solution

Image

NickSCFC

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by NickSCFC » Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:40 am

Can't decide who I despise more, Nuttall or Corbyn.

I'll be voting for our local Tory boy, I've been impressed with his efforts in attracting regeneration to the city.

User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Rex Kramer » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:55 am

NickSCFC wrote:Can't decide who I despise more, Nuttall or Corbyn.

I'll be voting for our local Tory boy, I've been impressed with his efforts in attracting regeneration to the city.

I really hope that today's defining picture is Paul Nuttalls of the UKIPs miserable face at the count later today.

EDIT: If he does lose, he'll probably blame all the gays for causing storm Doris.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Moggy » Thu Feb 23, 2017 9:59 am

Rex Kramer wrote:Paul Nuttalls of the UKIPs


:lol:

User avatar
DML
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by DML » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:24 am

If they can't win this seat, UKIP can't realistically expect to win anywhere.

User avatar
Grumpy David
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Cubeamania

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Grumpy David » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:53 am

I suspect Labour will edge it. 1st but with a reduced margin.

Torn between wanting that to happen to keep Corbyn in charge for as long as possible vs wanting UKIP to get in.

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by KK » Thu Feb 23, 2017 10:53 am

Reuters wrote:Net migration to Britain falls to lowest in more than two years

Net migration to Britain has fallen to its lowest in more than two years, official data showed on Thursday, partly driven by an increase in the number of people from some eastern European countries leaving.

But the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said it was too early to discern the long-term migration effects of Britain's referendum decision last June to leave the EU.

ONS figures showed a net 273,000 people came to Britain in the year to last September, down 49,000 from the previous year and the lowest recorded figure since the year ending June 2014.

Net migration of EU citizens during the period, the first to include the three months following the referendum, was 165,000, a drop of 6,000 on the previous year.

The ONS said there had been a statistically significant increase in emigration by citizens from the so-called EU8 countries -- Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia -- up 12,000 to 39,000.

The number of people arriving from those countries also fell, it said.

Meanwhile the numbers of people arriving from Bulgaria and Romania rose by 19,000 to 74,000, the highest ever level.

"Although we have seen a fall in net migration of EU8 citizens there have been continued increases in immigration from Romania and Bulgaria, so it is too early to say what effect the referendum result has had on long-term international migration," said Nicola White, head of international migration statistics at the ONS.

Figures earlier this month showed a steady rise in the number of EU migrants working in Britain stalled at the end of 2016, suggesting the Brexit vote and the subsequent fall in the value of the pound, might have made the country less attractive as a place to work.

After a surge in immigration over the past 20 years, Britain has one of the highest proportions of non-native workers among European countries. Worries about migration were a big factor in last June's vote to leave the EU.

Prime Minister Theresa May has recommitted to her predecessor's pledge to cut annual net migration to under 100,000 and has promised to ensure Britain regains control of immigration as part of its Brexit deal.

Immigration minister Robert Goodwill told Sky TV Thursday's figures were "very encouraging indeed" and he hoped further progress could be made towards the 100,000 target.

http://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britai ... KKBN162108

Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Moggy » Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:00 am

Grumpy David wrote:I suspect Labour will edge it. 1st but with a reduced margin.

Torn between wanting that to happen to keep Corbyn in charge for as long as possible vs wanting UKIP to get in.


Corbyn wont go anywhere until he loses a General Election.

Even if you want UKIP to get in (why? Hard Brexit is happening) I can’t understand how anybody could want Paul “I’m a liar” Nuttall to get in.

User avatar
Rex Kramer
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Rex Kramer » Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:04 am

Moggy wrote:
Grumpy David wrote:I suspect Labour will edge it. 1st but with a reduced margin.

Torn between wanting that to happen to keep Corbyn in charge for as long as possible vs wanting UKIP to get in.


Corbyn wont go anywhere until he loses a General Election.

Even if you want UKIP to get in (why? Hard Brexit is happening) I can’t understand how anybody could want Paul “I’m a liar” Nuttall to get in.

I don't know what you mean, who wouldn't want the first person to entirely sequence the human genome as their MP?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Moggy » Thu Feb 23, 2017 11:08 am

Rex Kramer wrote:
Moggy wrote:
Grumpy David wrote:I suspect Labour will edge it. 1st but with a reduced margin.

Torn between wanting that to happen to keep Corbyn in charge for as long as possible vs wanting UKIP to get in.


Corbyn wont go anywhere until he loses a General Election.

Even if you want UKIP to get in (why? Hard Brexit is happening) I can’t understand how anybody could want Paul “I’m a liar” Nuttall to get in.

I don't know what you mean, who wouldn't want the first person to entirely sequence the human genome as their MP?


I sense you are taking the piss, which is really mean when the poor man managed to survive getting an arrow in the eye at the Battle of Hastings. :x

bear
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by bear » Sun Feb 26, 2017 8:52 am

http://www.irishnews.com/news/2017/02/25/news/dup-transferred-9-000-from-brexit-donation-to-party-funds-944576/

THE DUP transferred £9,000 from the donation it received for its Brexit campaign into normal party funds.

Details of the funding emerged as the DUP last night continued to face questions over a pro-union group bankrolling its £425,000 Brexit campaign.

Amid mounting pressure to make public the mystery donor, the party yesterday confirmed it was financed by the Constitutional Research Council (CRC).

More than half was spent on a £282,000 front-page wraparound advertisement in the British newspaper Metro – a publication not circulated in Northern Ireland.


The names of donors in Northern Ireland are automatically withheld due to Troubles-era rules which sought to protect their security



Arron Banks had earlier accused the DUP of demanding cash to support his Brexit campaign.

Details about the negotiations were first aired in Mr Banks’ memoirs, The Bad Boys of Brexit, when he wrote: “The DUP is demanding cold, hard cash in exchange for its support! Thirty grand a month, to be precise. I know Northern Irish politics is dirty, but this is crazy. It all came about because Farage is mates with [DUP MP] Ian Paisley Junior.”



Nothing shady about those lads. Nothing at all.

User avatar
Meep
Member
Joined in 2010
Location: Belfast

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Meep » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:52 am

The DUP are corrupt! I never would have guessed... if not for the dozens of other scandals they have been involved in.

The whole reason the election is happening next week is because they 'mismanaged' the heating scheme and landed the taxpayer a massive bill. Incidentally, many friends and family members of DUP MLAs signed up to the scheme before this came out. Even if you accept the initial mistake was accidental, their reaction to it still speak volumes. Their first instinct on hearing the scheme could be exploited was tell those close to them about so they could make a nice little earner. It's just their nature.

Yet watch the ignorant sheep in East Belfast come out and vote for them regardless. I despair.

Brexit is emblematic of how little regard this party has for the people it reports to govern for. It does not scare that Brexit and the border will likely have profoundly negative effects for all us living in Northern Ireland. All they care about is getting one over the nationalists by cutting off their easy access to ROI. Any economic hardship this causes ordinary people is just collateral damage as far as they are concerned. Ironically in acting this way they have undermined their own cause. A lot of people who were relaxed about the previous situation will now be pushing much more strong for unification. The peace had pretty much pacified nationalism yet still the DUP do not understand how much they stand to lose by jeopardising it.

User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Squinty » Sun Feb 26, 2017 12:05 pm

The DUP election pamphlet is really something. There's a big picture of Gerry Adams on the inside of it, basically telling the gullible 'this guy buried Stormont, hate him and vote DUP'.

I seriously hope neither of those parties get their positions back. But I'd say it will happen regardless of all the corruption and proof that this relationship does not fundamentally work.

User avatar
KK
Moderator
Joined in 2008
Location: Botswana
Contact:

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by KK » Sun Feb 26, 2017 3:59 pm

In case anyone thought it was just us (and America) who are seeing a rise in hate crimes:

BBC News wrote:Nearly 10 attacks were made on migrants in Germany every day in 2016, the interior ministry says.

A total of 560 people were injured in the violence, including 43 children.

Three-quarters of the attacks targeted migrants outside of their accommodation, while nearly 1,000 attacks were on housing.

Chancellor Angela Merkel's decision to open up Germany to people fleeing conflict and persecution has polarised the country and boosted hate crime.

Germany is struggling with a backlog of asylum applications and there are fears about security following a series of terrorist attacks across Europe.

But the number of asylum seekers arriving in Germany in 2016 was 280,000, a drop of more than 600,000 from the previous year, following the closure of the Balkan migrant route and an EU deal with Turkey.

The issue is expected to feature heavily in parliamentary elections this September.

Sunday's interior ministry figures, which are preliminary, were released in response to a parliamentary question.

There was no comparison with previous years because attacks against individual migrants only started to be counted as a separate category in 2016.

Attacks on asylum shelters and migrants

December 2015 - 12 people injured after fires broke out at two hostels in Wasserstein, Bavaria
January 2016 - Live grenade thrown at hostel housing 170 people in the south-western town in Villingen-Schwenningen but fails to detonate
February 2016 - Fire in Bautzen, eastern Germany, destroys roof of building planned to house migrants. Police say some onlookers cheered the fire and tried to prevent firefighters from extinguishing the blaze
September 2016 - Residents clash with migrants in Bautzen
February 2017 - Politician from the far-right NPD jailed for eight years for burning down a sports hall to be used to house migrants in Nauen, west of Berlin, in August 2015

The interior ministry figures
3,533 attacks on migrants and asylum hostels in 2016
2.545 attacks on individual migrants
560 people injured, including 43 children
988 attacks on housing (slightly fewer than in 2015)
217 attacks on refugee organisations and volunteers

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39096833

Image
User avatar
Qikz
#420BlazeIt ♥
Joined in 2011

PostRe: The EU Referendum: The UK votes Leave
by Qikz » Sun Feb 26, 2017 10:55 pm

Society is going backwards.

The Watching Artist wrote:I feel so inept next to Qikz...

Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 286 guests