Re: The Facebook Thread 2
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2020 12:04 am
Ffs
Well done priti now send them home if not British citizens and if they are send to jail and when they get released make them work free of charge
Back home they must go
Now sort those dinghys out please !
Well done Prita, now sought the channel illegal's out.
how do you know they are immigrants.
I know they didn't have an INVITATION.
Does anyone else think Priti Patel is a a babe
i would defo stick my willy in her..
What about this, buy a couple of mtb's, and blast the arseholes out of the water. Problem solved. Seemples
JUST WISH THEY WOULD/COULD FIND ALL THE ILLEGALS AND SEND THEM BACK TO WHERE THEY CAME FROM. NO BIRTH CERTIFICATES NO PASSPORTS. OUT GONE AND FORGOTTEN
Such vital vital work you do Priti
Hi all ways ware flat jacket no good if u got hurt. cart a ford to lose u just yet
Mini E wrote:Made the mistake of reading a comment chain on a Priti Patel post of her watching an arrest (no idea why this was on my timeline).
"Who all, other than me, Thinks the media is responsible for promoting Racial Violence in this country"
Language Barrier Resoponsible for Coronavirus Surge in UK City - BreitbartUK begins Deporting Criminal Migrants back to their Home CountriesHelp Stop Knife crime in London, don't vote for this guy (picutre of Sadiq Khan)A Picture comparing BLM with ISISThese 3 Muslim Men from Croydon who raped a young English Girl with learning disabilities, share and expose these scumbagsJust a thought, the term BAME. Who decided on the acronym, it could be construed as black people are better than asian or minorities because the B is first?These five people broke into the home of an 83 year old lady in Georgia. Because she had no money to give them they beat her mercilessly leaving her with multi.. (Picture of 5 black people)
Moggy wrote:Mini E wrote:Made the mistake of reading a comment chain on a Priti Patel post of her watching an arrest (no idea why this was on my timeline).
Albear wrote:A Friend posted this, this morning"Who all, other than me, Thinks the media is responsible for promoting Racial Violence in this country"
Moggy wrote:Mini E wrote:Made the mistake of reading a comment chain on a Priti Patel post of her watching an arrest (no idea why this was on my timeline).
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:If you actually care about the person, or those who engage with the posts, I say challenge it (obviously in a respectful, constructive way).
If you don't care about the person or those engaged then strawberry float it, leave it and consider whether or not you need them to be in your friends list.
I am starting to feel a sense of guilt if I simply ignore something posted by someone in my 'social remit' (e.g. say it was a family member or someone I have more than just a passing acquaintance with) as there is a sense of complicity by allowing it to go unchallenged. People you really care about could be hurt by things being posted, seeing people they consider family/close friends aren't stepping in and wondering if perhaps they agree with it too.
Of course, it's just not as straight forward as social interaction used to be, e.g. if you were sat in a group together in real life and someone started spouting gooseberry fool, you'd no doubt feel much more of a sense of responsibility to not less it pass. On Facebook etc it's all within such a larger, almost public, view and no one is actually 'there' in a real sense.
I think if people are posting things on Facebook, they should expect to be challenged on it. They will have the option to remove people from their friends list and to restrict who can actually see what they're posting.
Moggy wrote:Oblomov Boblomov wrote:If you actually care about the person, or those who engage with the posts, I say challenge it (obviously in a respectful, constructive way).
If you don't care about the person or those engaged then strawberry float it, leave it and consider whether or not you need them to be in your friends list.
I am starting to feel a sense of guilt if I simply ignore something posted by someone in my 'social remit' (e.g. say it was a family member or someone I have more than just a passing acquaintance with) as there is a sense of complicity by allowing it to go unchallenged. People you really care about could be hurt by things being posted, seeing people they consider family/close friends aren't stepping in and wondering if perhaps they agree with it too.
Of course, it's just not as straight forward as social interaction used to be, e.g. if you were sat in a group together in real life and someone started spouting gooseberry fool, you'd no doubt feel much more of a sense of responsibility to not less it pass. On Facebook etc it's all within such a larger, almost public, view and no one is actually 'there' in a real sense.
I think if people are posting things on Facebook, they should expect to be challenged on it. They will have the option to remove people from their friends list and to restrict who can actually see what they're posting.
It all depends who it is. There are some people who I know will listen and take things onboard. There are others who I know are a lost cause.
It's just sad to see people who used to be decent turn into hate filled arseholes.
Oblomov Boblomov wrote:Moggy wrote:Oblomov Boblomov wrote:If you actually care about the person, or those who engage with the posts, I say challenge it (obviously in a respectful, constructive way).
If you don't care about the person or those engaged then strawberry float it, leave it and consider whether or not you need them to be in your friends list.
I am starting to feel a sense of guilt if I simply ignore something posted by someone in my 'social remit' (e.g. say it was a family member or someone I have more than just a passing acquaintance with) as there is a sense of complicity by allowing it to go unchallenged. People you really care about could be hurt by things being posted, seeing people they consider family/close friends aren't stepping in and wondering if perhaps they agree with it too.
Of course, it's just not as straight forward as social interaction used to be, e.g. if you were sat in a group together in real life and someone started spouting gooseberry fool, you'd no doubt feel much more of a sense of responsibility to not less it pass. On Facebook etc it's all within such a larger, almost public, view and no one is actually 'there' in a real sense.
I think if people are posting things on Facebook, they should expect to be challenged on it. They will have the option to remove people from their friends list and to restrict who can actually see what they're posting.
It all depends who it is. There are some people who I know will listen and take things onboard. There are others who I know are a lost cause.
It's just sad to see people who used to be decent turn into hate filled arseholes.
I still think it's worth challenging (assuming the 'care' factor is in play) as at least it will show everyone reading it what your opinion is (for better or worse) and maybe make them feel reassured people aren't willing to let gooseberry fool like that slide.
If they are hate-filled arseholes, do you want to be associated with them anyway? I get that it could be hideously awkward, especially with family members, but to be honest I'd be quite proud if I saw a member of my family standing up for what's right by challenging another family member who was spouting hateful gooseberry fool, and I would strongly defend their right to do so, regardless of which hand-wringers also in the family thought it was a bad thing to cause a fuss, or whatever.
Moggy wrote:Oblomov Boblomov wrote:If you actually care about the person, or those who engage with the posts, I say challenge it (obviously in a respectful, constructive way).
If you don't care about the person or those engaged then strawberry float it, leave it and consider whether or not you need them to be in your friends list.
I am starting to feel a sense of guilt if I simply ignore something posted by someone in my 'social remit' (e.g. say it was a family member or someone I have more than just a passing acquaintance with) as there is a sense of complicity by allowing it to go unchallenged. People you really care about could be hurt by things being posted, seeing people they consider family/close friends aren't stepping in and wondering if perhaps they agree with it too.
Of course, it's just not as straight forward as social interaction used to be, e.g. if you were sat in a group together in real life and someone started spouting gooseberry fool, you'd no doubt feel much more of a sense of responsibility to not less it pass. On Facebook etc it's all within such a larger, almost public, view and no one is actually 'there' in a real sense.
I think if people are posting things on Facebook, they should expect to be challenged on it. They will have the option to remove people from their friends list and to restrict who can actually see what they're posting.
It all depends who it is. There are some people who I know will listen and take things onboard. There are others who I know are a lost cause.
It's just sad to see people who used to be decent turn into hate filled arseholes.
<]:^D wrote:wait Albear forgive me but are you Muslim then? how did her family take it? are they quite 'liberal' i.e. they dont believe that she has to marry a Muslim/person of God?