Parksey wrote:Tomous wrote:Benzin wrote:I guess West Ham were chosen because they won the World Cup?
It's the 9 teams that currently have the longest stays in the PL. It's very arbitrary.
Yep, had this come in in 2008 or whenever, it's like Middlesbrough would have been in that top 9. And yet no-one's going to be counting us as one of the top teams, it's just a case of drawing up the ladder behind them at this current time.
Let's face it, a lot of PL clubs would be more than happy to have an American-style league where you have the same 20 teams in year in, year out. No relegation or promotion, let's keep the gravy train circling around just us.
For the really wealthy, big clubs. That's not enough. Why should they share things with "little" Burnley, Brighton or Sheffield United? No-one turns in to watch them on TV. They've never done anything! Where even is Burnley or Sheffield or United anyway?
This is a deal with the devil, and is giving with one hand but absolutely looting what they can get with the other. It's a power grab. It's overing a thirsty person water in return for a life debt. It's taking advantage of things - the league will get short term benefit but long term they'll have signed away their soul. It's an emergency pay day loan with massive interest.
It's not even the big clubs' £250m anyway. It's not coming from Manchester United and Liverpool only. It's coming from all 20 clubs, so it's even more of a pittance. They are donating other clubs' money for them, and asking them to waiver certain rights and privileges.
It's horrendous.