GRcade

Moggy wrote:

Errkal wrote:I say we shun him from the community.

We could all put him on ignore, but then we risk missing out on a photo of our Lord and Saviour Stool Bloke.

If he is the true lord and saviour he will find a way to let his presence be known.

Errkal wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Errkal wrote:I say we shun him from the community.

We could all put him on ignore, but then we risk missing out on a photo of our Lord and Saviour Stool Bloke.

If he is the true lord and saviour he will find a way to let his presence be known.

Not if we continue to be deceived by the false prophet Vermilion. The false prophet must be burned.

Moggy wrote:

Errkal wrote:

Moggy wrote:

Errkal wrote:I say we shun him from the community.

We could all put him on ignore, but then we risk missing out on a photo of our Lord and Saviour Stool Bloke.

If he is the true lord and saviour he will find a way to let his presence be known.

Not if we continue to be deceived by the false prophet Vermilion. The false prophet must be burned.

Vermilion is an enemy of the saviour. He is trying to keep the lord for himself.

He must be sacrificed on the alter of the stool. We must show the lord our dedication by sacrificing the false prophet and he will return to us and show us wisdom.

I don't think there ever was a stool bloke.

He found a collection of photos of this guy in an album online somewhere, concocted a narrative and spun the pictures out over the year.

Now he's run out of them and the game is up

Ad7 wrote:I don't think there ever was a stool bloke.

He found a collection of photos of this guy in an album online somewhere, concocted a narrative and spun the pictures out over the year.

Now he's run out of them and the game is up

Blasphemy

Search your feelings, you know it to be true.

I have extremely good neighbours but am moving house and have absolutely no doubt the new neighbours are going to be dicks. We're moving to within 100m of an EF school

My Stool Bloke, my Stool Bloke, why hast thou forsaken us?

A (decent) resident in my block saw the (was-to-be-evicted-but-maybe-won't-be-now) resident earlier. Was-to-be-evicted was saying that she wished she lived on the ground floor so that she could tie a long, extendable lead to her dog and leave it to run around out there i.e. so that the barking and gooseberry-fooling didn't disturb her. Instead she lets the dog roam free across the site, and at the local park, and just wanders round to "collect" it late in the evening (by bawling out it's name at 11pm).

.

strawberry floating hell.

I'm going to take a wild guess here that the dog is a Staffordshire bull terrier

Ad7 wrote:...I'm going to take a wild guess here that the dog is a Staffordshire bull terrier

I'm not knowledgable about types of dog; it's a wee thing - the kind that you could pick up and carry. It runs around the car park yapping and, when I saw it, had no collar or ID disc on it. I guess it's gooseberry-fooling wherever it wants to.

The dog is definitely smarter than the owner.

We had an "unwanted visitor" to the site this morning. A bloke in a van drove into the private car park area and took a dump there.

I am not making this up; I saw him exit the van, drop his trousers... and he left a large amount of toilet paper laying there in the car park. He then changed his trousers and drove off.

I honestly feel like I'm living in some backward, lawless area of London. Except with stupidly strawberry-floatin' expensive housing. I've advised the details to the Police Safer Neighbourhoods Team but I don't anticipate hearing anything back.

jawafour wrote:We had an "unwanted visitor" to the site this morning. A bloke in a van drove into the private car park area and took a dump there.

I am not making this up; I saw him exit the van, drop his trousers... and he left a large amount of toilet paper laying there in the car park. He then changed his trousers and drove off.

I honestly feel like I'm living in some backward, lawless area of London. Except with stupidly strawberry-floatin' expensive housing. I've advised the details to the Police Safer Neighbourhoods Team but I don't anticipate hearing anything back.

Everything about that story is wrong.

jawafour wrote:We had an "unwanted visitor" to the site this morning. A bloke in a van drove into the private car park area and took a dump there.

I am not making this up; I saw him exit the van, drop his trousers... and he left a large amount of toilet paper laying there in the car park. He then changed his trousers and drove off.

I honestly feel like I'm living in some backward, lawless area of London. Except with stupidly strawberry-floatin' expensive housing. I've advised the details to the Police Safer Neighbourhoods Team but I don't anticipate hearing anything back.

Sounds like the guy in the local news thread.

I really is a shame the name "Stool Bloke" is taken

OrangeRKN wrote:I really is a shame the name "Stool Bloke" is taken

I have had a response from the Police Safer Neighbourhoods Team.

...We have checked the vehicle and it is registered to someone in the forest hill area . If they lived closer we would go and speak to them but unfortunately it is too far away...

A genuine response; I am not making this up.

What the actual...?!?!? Crime can't be dealt with if the perpetrator is "too far away" .

jawafour wrote:I have had a response from the Police Safer Neighbourhoods Team.

...We have checked the vehicle and it is registered to someone in the forest hill area . If they lived closer we would go and speak to them but unfortunately it is too far away...

A genuine response; I am not making this up.

What the actual...?!?!? Crime can't be dealt with if the perpetrator is "too far away" .

Can’t they just pass the details to police who are closer to the shitter?

Moggy wrote:

jawafour wrote:I have had a response from the Police Safer Neighbourhoods Team.

...We have checked the vehicle and it is registered to someone in the forest hill area . If they lived closer we would go and speak to them but unfortunately it is too far away...

A genuine response; I am not making this up.

What the actual...?!?!? Crime can't be dealt with if the perpetrator is "too far away" .

Can’t they just pass the details to police who are closer to the shitter?

Greater co-operation between Police units has long been a requirement in the UK.

Sadly the idea keeps getting poo-pooed.

I am genuinely stunned; actually wondering if I contacted a comedy email account in error.

"Too far away" .

... .