Looks like out of all the current entries, I win. I was in hospitlal around 9 years ago with a collapsed lung. This was a relatively straight forward procedure which involved having a bottle attached to my chest via a tube and staying in hospital for 5 days whilst my lung repaired itself.
In Jan this year I had it collapse again and after the simpler procedure (syringe in chest) failed to give the desired results (I.e. Lung restoration) I had to go back in for the previous procedure. However, much to my horror, I discovered that the guidelines say that if you have a 2nd collapsed lung (same one) you have to have an operation to attach the lung to your inner chest wall to prevent it from happening again
I did protest, but different doctors/surgeons/specialists there all told me the same thing so I eventually agreed. I'd never had an anaesthetic before or operation and when I had to sign a consent form the night before (where possible outcomes included death) I was a bit
to say the least. That isn't exactly the end of the story, but I'll save the next installment for another time.....