GRcade

The butterfly is back

strawberry float djokovic

Delighted for Novak.

Well at least we've covered all possible reactions now.

Between them Federer, Nadal and Djokovic have won 50 of the last 61 grand slams.

Really happy to see Murray playing well against an awkward strawberry floater in Duckworth.

Nice to see Murray doing what he does best. Losing and moaning about it.

Murraynho

strawberry floating Amazon have truly strawberry floated the dog here. No way to watch overnight matches without staying awake til 5am every day, that's the whole tournament ruined. Incompetent fuckwits.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/aw/reviews/B07FR8X9FR/ref=cm_cr_getr_mb_paging_btm_4?ie=UTF8&sortBy=recent&pageNumber=4

about 700 one star reviews

They give you one match per day to rewatch, 2 days later. strawberry floating useless and pathetic.

Through AWS they have internal access to what is probably the world's largest resource of computing storage & bandwidth. Literally all they would have to do is leave up the streams for people to watch the next day. It would be the simplest strawberry floating thing on earth.

Denster wrote:Nice to see Murray doing what he does best. Losing and moaning about it.

To be fair if Verdasco was talking to his team right in front of the supervisor then Murray has a right to be annoyed. Rules are there for a reason.

As for his game, I think he needs to do what Roger and Rafa have done which is try to keep the points shorter as possible. He’s not going to grind or outlast from back of the court. He won’t last very long with that type of play. He needs to be more aggressive, which has been my problem with Murray as he does have the ability but he’s just happy for the other guy to make mistakes.

Anyway Kyrgios

twitter.com/benrothenberg/status/1035227611776147457

twitter.com/benrothenberg/status/1035255411367202817

If Kyrgios was underperforming and the umpire felt the audience wasn't getting their money's worth then I don't see the problem with what the ump did. If however he was just straight up coaching for the sake of it then, yes, that's an issue.

The Kyrgios thing the definition of who gives a gooseberry fool.

The Cornet thing is much more worrying.

Saint of Killers wrote:If Kyrgios was underperforming and the umpire felt the audience wasn't getting their money's worth then I don't see the problem with what the ump did. If however he was just straight up coaching for the sake of it then, yes, that's an issue.

It is a problem because the Umpires job is not to go down and give him a pep talk.

If hes tanking then you give him a warning and then start giving points against him. There was no need for a umpire to go next to him and tell him that he should be trying harder. If you give him a warning then he’d get the message.

PES Fan wrote:

Saint of Killers wrote:If Kyrgios was underperforming and the umpire felt the audience wasn't getting their money's worth then I don't see the problem with what the ump did. If however he was just straight up coaching for the sake of it then, yes, that's an issue.

It is a problem because the Umpires job is not to go down and give him a pep talk.

If hes tanking then you give him a warning and then start giving points against him. There was no need for a umpire to go next to him and tell him that he should be trying harder. If you give him a warning then he’d get the message.

Serious question: Is what he did against the rules of the game/being an umpire?

Anyone see Federer’s winner against Kyrgios? He went from the side of the net it was so wide. Fantastic.

Denster wrote:Anyone see Federer’s winner against Kyrgios? He went from the side of the net it was so wide. Fantastic.

Yeah that was incredible, Kyrgios' reaction said it all!