The Tennis Thread

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Grumpy David
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Cubeamania

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Grumpy David » Tue Jan 04, 2022 11:48 am

Earlier this week, Australian Open chief Craig Tiley said that some unvaccinated players had been granted exemptions to play in the year's first Grand Slam.

Applications for medical exemptions are being assessed anonymously by two separate panels, with inflammatory cardiac illness or another acute condition listed as valid reasons.

But it is also possible Djokovic has recently tested positive for the virus, which would allow him to defer taking the vaccine.


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/59865959

At best, it's a recent infection he's kept quiet about, but most likely he's just getting special treatment.

User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Denster » Tue Jan 04, 2022 7:32 pm

Im his biggest fan but it looks like the Aussies have caved there.

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by captain red dog » Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:04 am

Very uncomfortable that the onus seems to be on Djokovic making his personal medical information public, which is what exemptions are supposed to avoid. I genuinely don't believe he will be given an exemption based on star power, it hasn't stopped Australia from cancelling some very lucrative events over the last year, or preventing other celebrities from circumventing the rules.

Daniel Riccardo for example has spoken about how he has to abide by the 14 day quarantine to return home for the winter.

User avatar
Drumstick
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Drumstick » Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:25 am

He doesn't need to make it public - he just needs to present the evidence to organisers.

I do however think that they should be treating other athletes competing under exemptions similarly.

Check out my YouTube channel!
One man should not have this much power in this game. Luckily I'm not an ordinary man.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Memento Mori » Wed Jan 05, 2022 11:28 am

captain red dog wrote:Very uncomfortable that the onus seems to be on Djokovic making his personal medical information public, which is what exemptions are supposed to avoid. I genuinely don't believe he will be given an exemption based on star power, it hasn't stopped Australia from cancelling some very lucrative events over the last year, or preventing other celebrities from circumventing the rules.

Daniel Riccardo for example has spoken about how he has to abide by the 14 day quarantine to return home for the winter.

The tennis world number 1 is more famous than Daniel Ricciardo who's fading within his own sport.

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Memento Mori » Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:35 pm

Breaking News: Australia's revoked Novax's visa. He's flying out again.

What a shame.

User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Cuttooth » Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:38 pm

Mori can we get a Thick of It Peter Mannion laughing gif for this news?

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Memento Mori » Wed Jan 05, 2022 9:49 pm

Cuttooth wrote:Mori can we get a Thick of It Peter Mannion laughing gif for this news?


Image


His lawyers are trying to appeal.

User avatar
Tineash
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Tineash » Wed Jan 05, 2022 10:12 pm

All he had to do was just shut up & get jabbed

"exceptionally annoying" - TheTurnipKing
User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Denster » Thu Jan 06, 2022 7:31 am

Id still expect this to be overturned.

User avatar
Mommy Christmas
Multiball!
Joined in 2009

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Mommy Christmas » Thu Jan 06, 2022 7:37 am

Denster wrote:Id still expect this to be overturned.


Of course, they've let 3 players in already on the same grounds so a precedent has been set.

:dread:
User avatar
Denster
Member
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Denster » Thu Jan 06, 2022 7:41 am

Isnt it a technicality? They didn't declare his exemption status on the visa application.

I'll be very surprised if it isnt overturned.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Tomous » Thu Jan 06, 2022 8:11 am

Mommy wrote:
Denster wrote:Id still expect this to be overturned.


Of course, they've let 3 players in already on the same grounds so a precedent has been set.



They let 3 players in on the same visa, not necessarily the same grounds. Entirely possible (and likely to be honest) they demonstrated sufficient medical exemption evidence.

Them being let in with genuine reasons isn't really relevant to Djokovic who's trying to bend the rules because he is an antivaxx idiot.

Image
User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by captain red dog » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:08 am

Memento Mori wrote:
captain red dog wrote:Very uncomfortable that the onus seems to be on Djokovic making his personal medical information public, which is what exemptions are supposed to avoid. I genuinely don't believe he will be given an exemption based on star power, it hasn't stopped Australia from cancelling some very lucrative events over the last year, or preventing other celebrities from circumventing the rules.

Daniel Riccardo for example has spoken about how he has to abide by the 14 day quarantine to return home for the winter.

The tennis world number 1 is more famous than Daniel Ricciardo who's fading within his own sport.

Hmm maybe not in Australia though. To be fair to Danny Ric, it's too early in his career to say he is fading.

This is really weird. He got an exemption in Victoria but the national government say he isn't exempt, or rather they are saying he has a visa issue.

This is important ironically for people with disabilities or conditions that would make them exempt. We can all be sceptical that he is playing the system, but in all likelihood he probably tested positive within the last 3 months and can't get a vaccine even if he wanted to. On that basis, I don't think it's legal to ban him despite not wanting to be vaxxed.

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Memento Mori » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:23 am

His exemption is that he apparently had covid in the last 6 months. The federal government told the Australian tennis board in advance that didn't classify as an exemption. Tennis board seems to have ignored government advice.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Tomous » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:28 am

I wonder if the Tennis board just hoped the government would let him in to avoid the bad press.

If so, that has failed spectacularly :lol:

Image
User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by captain red dog » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:41 am

Memento Mori wrote:His exemption is that he apparently had covid in the last 6 months. The federal government told the Australian tennis board in advance that didn't classify as an exemption. Tennis board seems to have ignored government advice.

I guess it depends on what is advice and what is law for an exemption. Its astonishing the Aussies have made such a hash of it. Its not exactly an unforseen scenario.

Either the law around exemption is 3 months since a positive test, or 6 months and Djokovic either meets the requirement or not. It really should not have led to anyone being detained. That's a huge failing of the system.

User avatar
Memento Mori
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Emperor Mori

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Memento Mori » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:44 am

The law seems clear from the Australian government side (two vaccinations to get in without quarantine) but the Tennis board decided to ignore it because they wanted the world number 1 playing.

Novak could have still got in as an unvaccinated person if he'd agreed to quarantine for 7 days in advance.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Moggy » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:45 am

Stick him in quarantine and get Barnaby Joyce to threaten to euthanise him unless he apologises.

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: The Tennis Thread
by Tomous » Thu Jan 06, 2022 9:46 am

captain red dog wrote:
Memento Mori wrote:His exemption is that he apparently had covid in the last 6 months. The federal government told the Australian tennis board in advance that didn't classify as an exemption. Tennis board seems to have ignored government advice.

I guess it depends on what is advice and what is law for an exemption. Its astonishing the Aussies have made such a hash of it. Its not exactly an unforseen scenario.

Either the law around exemption is 3 months since a positive test, or 6 months and Djokovic either meets the requirement or not. It really should not have led to anyone being detained. That's a huge failing of the system.



If it true that entry requirements don't count covid in the last 6 months as a genuine exemption, the system hasn't failed, Djokovic has failed. The onus is on him to ensure he complies with visa entry requirements. If he turns up and doesn't meet the necessary requirements for entry that is entirely on him. This was entirely foreseeable, blatantly he arrogantly assumed they'd let him in because he is such a big star.

Memento Mori wrote:Novak could have still got in as an unvaccinated person if he'd agreed to quarantine for 7 days in advance.


Seems the rules are clear and he just wanted to ignore them.

Image

Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Edd, floydfreak, Garth, Google [Bot], Memento Mori, more heat than light, poshrule_uk, SEP and 186 guests