Cuttooth wrote:BID0 wrote:Moggy wrote:BID0 wrote:She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won
She stood for more of the same when people wanted change
I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again
Clinton received millions more votes than Trump. And she was the better candidate because she wasn’t a white supremacist apologist piece of gooseberry fool.
Yet she didn’t target the voters she needed. It’s not like she’s new to the game.
And she ran to the right of Trump/Republicans. It’s no wonder she couldn’t get the following she needed. That’s on her and her team for choosing the platform she ended up with. Not Russia or Bernie or whoever else is the scapegoat that day
She stood for more of the same but ran to the right of the Republicans? Bit all over the place here.
Trump ran left of her with things like no more wars and targeting Wall Street “drain the swamp”
Clinton wasn’t really providing anything more than what people had spent the previous 8 years living through. You knew what you were going to get if Hilary Clinton was President.
Trump and Bernie were filling stadiums on their campaigns with a message of change. The Clinton campaign completely ignored this and all of those votes. It doesn’t take a genius to watch a speech from either Trump or Bernie over that period and stop and think “hang-a-bout why were these two getting so much attention? - maybe we should meet in the middle and offer those people something for their votes”
I find it ridiculous that people say Bernie couldn’t have beat Clinton/Trump but in the next sentence he was so good he was the sole reason Clinton lost.
What did Clinton do after she lost? She toured the world selling her book, blaming anyone else that she could in the process