US Politics 2

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Cuttooth » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:09 pm

77 years old. strawberry floating hell.

User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Alvin Flummux » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:14 pm

When he loses, his supporters will let Trump win again.

User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: US Politics 2
by BID0 » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:20 pm

Alvin Flummux wrote:When he loses, his supporters will let Trump win again.

What :lol: if the Dems select someone who isn't worse than Trump then they might actually win this time

User avatar
Alvin Flummux
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Alvin Flummux » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:29 pm

BID0 wrote:
Alvin Flummux wrote:When he loses, his supporters will let Trump win again.

What :lol: if the Dems select someone who isn't worse than Trump then they might actually win this time


His supporters are "Bernie or nobody" types, willing to vote third party rather than unite against Trump. They proved this in 2016.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Moggy » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:34 pm

BID0 wrote:
Alvin Flummux wrote:When he loses, his supporters will let Trump win again.

What :lol: if the Dems select someone who isn't worse than Trump then they might actually win this time


They selected somebody better than Trump last time and that didn’t work out so well.

User avatar
Drumstick
Member ♥
Joined in 2008
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Drumstick » Tue Feb 19, 2019 5:37 pm

Buffoon.

Check out my YouTube channel!
One man should not have this much power in this game. Luckily I'm not an ordinary man.
Image Image Image
User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Peter Crisp » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:07 pm

I really, really hope Trump gets primaried just to see him moan like a child about it for years.

It will make it so much funnier when conservatives call people snowflakes when they have a leader who's king of the snowpeople.

Last edited by Peter Crisp on Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Moggy » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:07 pm

Peter Crisp wrote:I really, really hope Trump gets primaried just to see him moan like a child about it for years.


It’ll be great if some Republicans do go for the nomination. :lol:

User avatar
Peter Crisp
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Peter Crisp » Tue Feb 19, 2019 6:10 pm

Moggy wrote:
Peter Crisp wrote:I really, really hope Trump gets primaried just to see him moan like a child about it for years.


It’ll be great if some Republicans do go for the nomination. :lol:


The infighting will be hilarious with Trump fans being shown up to even conservatives as being as the rabid fanatics we all know them to be.

There's also a chance considering the shape he's in that Trump will just collapse mid way through and again that's another chance for his fans to back him anyway and claim being a fat unfit banana split shouldn't be a reason someone can't be President.

Vermilion wrote:I'd rather live in Luton.
User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: US Politics 2
by BID0 » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:19 pm

She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won

She stood for more of the same when people wanted change

I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again

User avatar
Jenuall
Member
Joined in 2008
AKA: Jenuall
Location: 40 light-years outside of the Exeter nebula
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Jenuall » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:26 pm

Feel the Bern!

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Moggy » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:28 pm

BID0 wrote:She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won

She stood for more of the same when people wanted change

I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again


Clinton received millions more votes than Trump. And she was the better candidate because she wasn’t a white supremacist apologist piece of gooseberry fool.

User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: US Politics 2
by BID0 » Tue Feb 19, 2019 7:31 pm

Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won

She stood for more of the same when people wanted change

I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again


Clinton received millions more votes than Trump. And she was the better candidate because she wasn’t a white supremacist apologist piece of gooseberry fool.

Yet she didn’t target the voters she needed. It’s not like she’s new to the game.

And she ran to the right of Trump/Republicans. It’s no wonder she couldn’t get the following she needed. That’s on her and her team for choosing the platform she ended up with. Not Russia or Bernie or whoever else is the scapegoat that day

User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Cuttooth » Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:29 pm

BID0 wrote:
Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won

She stood for more of the same when people wanted change

I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again


Clinton received millions more votes than Trump. And she was the better candidate because she wasn’t a white supremacist apologist piece of gooseberry fool.

Yet she didn’t target the voters she needed. It’s not like she’s new to the game.

And she ran to the right of Trump/Republicans. It’s no wonder she couldn’t get the following she needed. That’s on her and her team for choosing the platform she ended up with. Not Russia or Bernie or whoever else is the scapegoat that day

She stood for more of the same but ran to the right of the Republicans? Bit all over the place here. :?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Moggy » Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:43 pm

twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1097901885162434561



:dread:

User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Lex-Man » Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:54 pm

Moggy wrote:

twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1097901885162434561



:dread:


So you're saying Trump doesn't hate Muslims right.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Moggy » Tue Feb 19, 2019 8:58 pm

Lex-Man wrote:
Moggy wrote:

twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1097901885162434561



:dread:


So you're saying Trump doesn't hate Muslims right.


He likes rich Muslims that brutally kill other Muslims.

User avatar
BID0
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Essex

PostRe: US Politics 2
by BID0 » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:00 pm

Cuttooth wrote:
BID0 wrote:
Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won

She stood for more of the same when people wanted change

I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again


Clinton received millions more votes than Trump. And she was the better candidate because she wasn’t a white supremacist apologist piece of gooseberry fool.

Yet she didn’t target the voters she needed. It’s not like she’s new to the game.

And she ran to the right of Trump/Republicans. It’s no wonder she couldn’t get the following she needed. That’s on her and her team for choosing the platform she ended up with. Not Russia or Bernie or whoever else is the scapegoat that day

She stood for more of the same but ran to the right of the Republicans? Bit all over the place here. :?

Trump ran left of her with things like no more wars and targeting Wall Street “drain the swamp”

Clinton wasn’t really providing anything more than what people had spent the previous 8 years living through. You knew what you were going to get if Hilary Clinton was President.

Trump and Bernie were filling stadiums on their campaigns with a message of change. The Clinton campaign completely ignored this and all of those votes. It doesn’t take a genius to watch a speech from either Trump or Bernie over that period and stop and think “hang-a-bout why were these two getting so much attention? - maybe we should meet in the middle and offer those people something for their votes”

I find it ridiculous that people say Bernie couldn’t have beat Clinton/Trump but in the next sentence he was so good he was the sole reason Clinton lost.

What did Clinton do after she lost? She toured the world selling her book, blaming anyone else that she could in the process

User avatar
Lex-Man
Member
Joined in 2008
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Lex-Man » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:02 pm

Moggy wrote:
Lex-Man wrote:
Moggy wrote:

twitter.com/nprpolitics/status/1097901885162434561



:dread:


So you're saying Trump doesn't hate Muslims right.


He likes rich Muslims that brutally kill other Muslims.


Can't you replace the word Muslim with literally any race or type of human and it'd basically be correct.

Amusement under late capitalism is the prolongation of work.
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 2
by Moggy » Tue Feb 19, 2019 9:04 pm

BID0 wrote:
Cuttooth wrote:
BID0 wrote:
Moggy wrote:
BID0 wrote:She obviously wasn’t better than trump otherwise she would have won

She stood for more of the same when people wanted change

I expect them to go with Kamala Harris this time and see Trump win again


Clinton received millions more votes than Trump. And she was the better candidate because she wasn’t a white supremacist apologist piece of gooseberry fool.

Yet she didn’t target the voters she needed. It’s not like she’s new to the game.

And she ran to the right of Trump/Republicans. It’s no wonder she couldn’t get the following she needed. That’s on her and her team for choosing the platform she ended up with. Not Russia or Bernie or whoever else is the scapegoat that day

She stood for more of the same but ran to the right of the Republicans? Bit all over the place here. :?

Trump ran left of her with things like no more wars and targeting Wall Street “drain the swamp”

Clinton wasn’t really providing anything more than what people had spent the previous 8 years living through. You knew what you were going to get if Hilary Clinton was President.

Trump and Bernie were filling stadiums on their campaigns with a message of change. The Clinton campaign completely ignored this and all of those votes. It doesn’t take a genius to watch a speech from either Trump or Bernie over that period and stop and think “hang-a-bout why were these two getting so much attention? - maybe we should meet in the middle and offer those people something for their votes”

I find it ridiculous that people say Bernie couldn’t have beat Clinton/Trump but in the next sentence he was so good he was the sole reason Clinton lost.

What did Clinton do after she lost? She toured the world selling her book, blaming anyone else that she could in the process


Your argument is that Clinton lost because Trump was better.

But then you argue that it’s ridiculous that Bernie couldn’t beat Clinton/Trump? Bernie lost to Clinton. By your own logic she was the better candidate.


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Albert, Deception, Godzilla, Grumpy David, kerr9000, poshrule_uk, Rubix, Vermilion and 254 guests