US Politics 3

Fed up talking videogames? Why?
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Mon Aug 08, 2022 9:33 pm

twitter.com/jessicavalenti/status/1556732559496822786



twitter.com/jessicavalenti/status/1556738947786719232



Monsters.

User avatar
Monkey Man
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Monkey Man » Tue Aug 09, 2022 12:37 am

twitter.com/BBCNews/status/1556786259200282624



:toot:

Image
User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Tomous » Tue Aug 09, 2022 12:48 am

Lads, it's strawberry floating happening!

Image
User avatar
Squinty
Member
Joined in 2009
Location: Norn Oirland

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Squinty » Tue Aug 09, 2022 6:21 am

r/conservatives going mental at this :datass:

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 6:33 am

So now the far right doesn't think blue lives matter? ;)

User avatar
Tomous
Member
Joined in 2010
AKA: Vampbuster

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Tomous » Tue Aug 09, 2022 7:26 am

I assume all the conservatives who lost their mind over Hillary Clinton's emails and screamed LOCK HER UP are now doing the same over Trump's far worse handling of classified documents?

Last edited by Tomous on Tue Aug 09, 2022 7:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 7:33 am

twitter.com/repmtg/status/1556793230028587009



:lol:

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 7:58 am

twitter.com/jfagone/status/1556797377050300417


User avatar
speedboatchase
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 3
by speedboatchase » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:03 am

Does this thread like the FBI now?

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:04 am

speedboatchase wrote:Does this thread like the FBI now?


Yes, we all love them now.

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: US Politics 3
by captain red dog » Tue Aug 09, 2022 10:00 am

MAGA fans can't complain. Trump promised to open a special investigation into Clinton on his first day in office (thus ensuring he broke his promise on the first day of the job). Bet he wishes he had done that now! :lol:

You have to believe this is leading somewhere. No way would the FBI raid a former president without having some extremely good grounds.

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 10:01 am

twitter.com/nigel_farage/status/1556908435706454016



twitter.com/jimmfelton/status/1556922928419176453



:lol:

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 1:47 pm

twitter.com/iwriteok/status/1556907847908134912



:lol:

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: US Politics 3
by captain red dog » Tue Aug 09, 2022 1:58 pm

Hillary is selling a "but her emails" hat. :lol:

Can you imagine the absolute outrage from MAGA if Clinton was raided by the FBI? It would be endless, brought up in every campaign speech, centre of every Fox bulletin.

User avatar
Dual
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Dual » Tue Aug 09, 2022 2:04 pm

Wow just how low will the FBI go? Attacking a former president in his private home. Is nothing sacred?

User avatar
OrangeRKN
Community Sec.
Joined in 2015
Location: Reading, UK
Contact:

PostRe: US Politics 3
by OrangeRKN » Tue Aug 09, 2022 4:18 pm

speedboatchase wrote:Does this thread like the FBI now?


I mean I do like the X-Files, but the most effective FBI propaganda is to compare them against the CIA.

Image
Image
orkn.uk - Top 5 Games of 2023 - SW-6533-2461-3235
User avatar
Cuttooth
Emeritus
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Cuttooth » Tue Aug 09, 2022 4:23 pm

Big fan of Agent Johnson (the other one).

User avatar
captain red dog
Member
Joined in 2008
Location: Bristol, UK

PostRe: US Politics 3
by captain red dog » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:23 pm

Louder with Crowder was immense today. Crowder was on the brink of tears, and it's hit him so bad that he was calling for the defunding of the intelligence agencies! I can remember him being absolutely furious about Portland and Defund the Police! :lol:

The first 20 mins of his episode on YouTube today was unintentionally hilarious!

User avatar
Moggy
"Special"
Joined in 2008
AKA: Moggy

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Moggy » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:26 pm

captain red dog wrote:Louder with Crowder was immense today. Crowder was on the brink of tears, and it's hit him so bad that he was calling for the defunding of the intelligence agencies! I can remember him being absolutely furious about Portland and Defund the Police! :lol:

The first 20 mins of his episode on YouTube today was unintentionally hilarious!


twitter.com/scrowder/status/1557017108864712704



Does he know he can't vote for all of those people, even if they agree with him? :lol:

User avatar
Xeno
Member
Joined in 2008

PostRe: US Politics 3
by Xeno » Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:51 pm

Just when you think gooseberry fool couldn't get stranger.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... oger-stone

The lawyer, Mark Bankston, the recipient of the accidental leak, appeared on Monday on the Young Turks progressive news commentary show to confirm that one of the texts in question contained a naked photo of Jones’s wife sent to Stone, once an adviser to former president Donald Trump.

Bankston also expressed concern about whether Jones had obtained permission from his wife, Erika Wulff Jones, to send that photo to Stone or anyone else.

“I don’t know if that was consensual,” said Bankston, who recently won a nearly $50m judgment against Jones for the family of a six-year-old boy killed during the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, which for years Jones falsely claimed was a hoax aimed at forcing nationwide gun control reform.

“And if it wasn’t consensual, Mrs Wulff Jones should know about that, and there might be something that needs to be done about that.”

Bankston conceded the possibility that “it could be totally consensual”. But, noting that some states criminalize the nonconsensual disclosure of intimate photos, he added: “I don’t see any indication that it was [consensual]. I’m concerned something might not be on the up and up with that.”


Incoming lawsuit?


Return to “Stuff”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addsy087, Cosmo, Google [Bot], Grumpy David, Robbo-92, speedboatchase, Vermilion and 318 guests