gamerforever wrote:More negative chatter from alex about sony. Sony have to pay for that infrastructure, why wouldn’t they charge for it? People pay for apple and google storage. The entitlement is embarassing.
It's not entitlement, it's Sony and Nintendo either coming up with barebones, backward online features and infrastructure or coming up with the most infuriating, illogical, drawn out steps to do things. Process could be streamlined, made more efficient for the user or implement features that are commonplace elsewhere.
Don't want to start tarring everything with a certain brush, but I live and work in Japan and the notion that it's a technological, futuristic paradise is wildly inaccurate - workplaces and industries don't adopt what we would call common tech, and often seem old-fashioned and outdated.
You only have to go look at the average Japanese website to see how different it is to what we as westerners are used to. They still use Yahoo search and Fax machines here. I'll do something simple like printscreen and my colleagues act like I've basically performed Dark Magic.
I didn't really see why Nintendo and Sony went about some things the way they do, but having lived here in Japan I can definitely understand it. I don't think tech-literacy is as high as back home, and things here often take 5 steps when they could take 2.
In my eyes, the online offerings of Sony and, especially Nintendo are a culture thing. And boneheaded stubbornness with Nintendo. It would not surprise me if it is a group of 60-70 year-old dudes making decisions about their online offerings.