No:1 Final Fantasy Fan wrote:I managed to fit it in during free periods or before/after college when I was 16/17 I also worked part time whilst in college to help pay for it. At the time it was £17 a lesson. I also only had one lesson per week as that seemed like the norm tbh. Having more than one a week will probably make it harder to take in and make the lessons less effective.
Although I did not buy or even drive a car again until I was 23 after getting my license at 18 but atleast I had the license already.
I remember someone asking me why I was learning when I didn't intend to get a car after but I just thought it was best to do it whilst in college to get it out the way as you never know when you will need a driving license. Therefore I don't think you have to factor in buying a car if you learn to drive. Like people learn to swim but don't go swimming often. Plus the only way I could have afforded a car when I was 18 was to use my student loan but I didn't want to do that and at the time I didn't need to drive as my commute to uni was fine by train. But that didn't stop me from learning to drive as I think of it as a life skill similar to knowing how to ride a bike.
Cars don't have to be super expensive either, I remember my friend got his first car for £400 although it had no power steering and was a right old banger but it did the job.
Regarding expensive insurance for first time drivers, I got my first year of insurance for free as a lot of dealerships were offering free insurance for new car purchases and then the following years were more affordable.
I think you are omitting details that would reveal your socioeconomic advantage even at that age. Tell me if this is true:
1. You exclusively paid for the cost of your lessons yourself, and didn't merely "help" pay for them. It would appear you were one of the many middle class people who's parents essentially pay for their "essential life skills" (including a bike to ride on).
2. You did not buy a brand new vehicle, at cost of several thousand of pounds, which yes, may include a subsidy by the dealer for your first year's insurance, sold in a package deal (which is normal, for example you rent a property and the estate agent very aggressively tries to sell you a bad rate on contents insurance), making that an entirely moot point. Besides being able to afford a new car, with a warranty, and the expectancy it will run good for several years with nothing else besides an MOT.
I think this would help people understand your perspective. Cheers.